<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[On Science and Medicine skeptics and MAHA]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>On Science and Medicine skeptics and MAHA</p><p>When you opponent says, “I simply don’t trust you. That is what it is.”</p><p>Your reply should be a question: </p><p>"What specific attributes or expertise would someone need to demonstrate for you to trust their judgment, even if you disagreed with them at the start?"</p><p>or maybe</p><p>"Is there any combination of professional background and transparency that would outweigh your personal intuition on this topic?"</p><p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/17/opinion/health/maha-public-health.html" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>nytimes.com/2026/03/17/opinion</span><span>/health/maha-public-health.html</span></a></p><p><a href="https://techhub.social/tags/maha" rel="tag">#<span>maha</span></a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/medicine" rel="tag">#<span>medicine</span></a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/science" rel="tag">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/skeptics" rel="tag">#<span>skeptics</span></a> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/kennedy" rel="tag">#<span>kennedy</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://postcall.pub/topic/1129a308-f5e4-4888-92ef-1b14136c65c8/on-science-and-medicine-skeptics-and-maha</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 15:54:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://postcall.pub/topic/1129a308-f5e4-4888-92ef-1b14136c65c8.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 21:59:17 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>