<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It&#x27;s so hard to figure out which scientific claims really hold up to scrutiny.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It's so hard to figure out which scientific claims really hold up to scrutiny. </p><p>For decades, a corner of the biology community has divined the truth by way of blind challenges. Now, a group of those organizers, including CASP of Alphafold fame, is turning its attention to the vagaries of the scientific literature, with a little help — they hope — from AI:</p><p><a href="https://www.statnews.com/2026/03/17/beacon-casp-coalition-tackle-science-reproducibility-crisis/" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>statnews.com/2026/03/17/beacon</span><span>-casp-coalition-tackle-science-reproducibility-crisis/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://newsie.social/tags/health" rel="tag">#<span>health</span></a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/healthcare" rel="tag">#<span>healthcare</span></a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/medicine" rel="tag">#<span>medicine</span></a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/AI" rel="tag">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/artificialintelligence" rel="tag">#<span>artificialintelligence</span></a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/science" rel="tag">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/research" rel="tag">#<span>research</span></a> <a href="https://newsie.social/tags/biology" rel="tag">#<span>biology</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://postcall.pub/topic/27a387db-2673-4d4e-a188-065448535622/it-s-so-hard-to-figure-out-which-scientific-claims-really-hold-up-to-scrutiny.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:58:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://postcall.pub/topic/27a387db-2673-4d4e-a188-065448535622.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 13:32:53 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s so hard to figure out which scientific claims really hold up to scrutiny. on Wed, 18 Mar 2026 19:29:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/chiasm%40mastodon.online">@<span>chiasm</span></a></span> Yes, that's the tough part. In theory, AI can solve a lot of problems, but in reality...it's something else!</p><p>Thanks for reading!</p>]]></description><link>https://postcall.pub/post/https://newsie.social/users/brittanytrang/statuses/116251830325879604</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://postcall.pub/post/https://newsie.social/users/brittanytrang/statuses/116251830325879604</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[brittanytrang@newsie.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 19:29:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s so hard to figure out which scientific claims really hold up to scrutiny. on Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:40:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/brittanytrang%40newsie.social">@<span>brittanytrang</span></a></span> no I did read it! I'm amused at a deeper conceptual level. I'm sure they'll come up with something, that will work for some problems in some areas.</p>]]></description><link>https://postcall.pub/post/https://mastodon.online/users/chiasm/statuses/116250458269307529</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://postcall.pub/post/https://mastodon.online/users/chiasm/statuses/116250458269307529</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[chiasm@mastodon.online]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:40:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s so hard to figure out which scientific claims really hold up to scrutiny. on Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:15:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/chiasm%40mastodon.online">@<span>chiasm</span></a></span> If you give it a read, you'll see that these are the last people on earth who would simply throw AI at a problem and say it'll fix it -- they've made it their business to disprove people's inflated claims since the '90s. Their strategy is actually pretty interesting and a decent use of AI.</p>]]></description><link>https://postcall.pub/post/https://newsie.social/users/brittanytrang/statuses/116250360755674666</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://postcall.pub/post/https://newsie.social/users/brittanytrang/statuses/116250360755674666</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[brittanytrang@newsie.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:15:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s so hard to figure out which scientific claims really hold up to scrutiny. on Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:12:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Yes! I need to get paid for my work so I can eat!</p><p>But STAT is running a 50% off sale through tomorrow: <a href="https://marketing.statnews.com/stat-plus-march26" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>marketing.statnews.com/stat-pl</span><span>us-march26</span></a></p><p>Or we have discounts for health care workers, academics, students, etc too: <a href="https://www.statnews.com/stat-subscription-discounts-students-educators-healthcare-workers/" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>statnews.com/stat-subscription</span><span>-discounts-students-educators-healthcare-workers/</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://postcall.pub/post/https://newsie.social/users/brittanytrang/statuses/116250348101275840</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://postcall.pub/post/https://newsie.social/users/brittanytrang/statuses/116250348101275840</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[brittanytrang@newsie.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:12:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s so hard to figure out which scientific claims really hold up to scrutiny. on Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:53:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/brittanytrang%40newsie.social">@<span>brittanytrang</span></a></span> </p><p>Paywall for that content?</p>]]></description><link>https://postcall.pub/post/https://mastodon.nz/users/cbuddenhagen/statuses/116245792877984766</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://postcall.pub/post/https://mastodon.nz/users/cbuddenhagen/statuses/116245792877984766</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cbuddenhagen@mastodon.nz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:53:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s so hard to figure out which scientific claims really hold up to scrutiny. on Tue, 17 Mar 2026 13:46:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/brittanytrang%40newsie.social">@<span>brittanytrang</span></a></span> Ah, the search for certainty.... <img src="https://postcall.pub/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f606.png?v=cec5bbd054b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--laughing" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="😆" alt="😆" />  I am amused that they are trying to use massive stochastic systems, to address a combination of probabilistic, conceptual, and systemic problems.  But good luck!</p>]]></description><link>https://postcall.pub/post/https://mastodon.online/users/chiasm/statuses/116244818297044725</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://postcall.pub/post/https://mastodon.online/users/chiasm/statuses/116244818297044725</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[chiasm@mastodon.online]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 13:46:02 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>