Most large wars do not kick off due to one event,

Alex, what is "The invasion of Poland"?

Not even Hitler is unique for his quick rise to power from dirt poor to top brass over a large population, which many i've spoken to earlier have believed.

I can write multiple A4 about all the various key events that led up to the invasion of Poland.

Hitler did for sure in my opinion play the primary role in WW2 during the war, but if you study WW2 objectively you will find that not many involved countries have acted noble during, before or after and another set of actions between WW1 and WW2 could have prevented it, and even rendered Hitler a non-important person historically. However, i agree that it is easy to speculate different outcomes when you know the existing time-line, just like cheating in a game. This might seem to be willingly forgotten by some of the key players today.

1949, another leader took his seat in a chair and caused massive damages in a region further away from Europe, that is something that should be studied more by European and American citizens.

To what reason? The story is replicated a milion times at least by now, you will probably find it and alternative stories all over any major search engine or LLM.

... to demonstrate that you understand it, not that LLM sloppers can regurgitate it.

I will only participate in wars if i am the target of it just as i never throw the first punch. Defensivism?

... would you like to elaborate how WW2 started.

Btw, I really appreciate that your writing is more calm and focused on connecting and helping me understand you, rather than coming off as antagonistic, these past few messages. Thank you.

One interesting person to study is Nero. If you like that kind of history, find different writtings from different years/periods(as close to his existance up untill today) and cross reference it in any way you can. It does get weird, but it does also show that people in groups seemingly starts sharing a mind if pushed by a greater entity. Just a tip.

Dawn over the Kalahari : how humans became human by Lasse Berg.

There are other books in the series tackling more modern times that I haven't read (I haven't found them in a language I speak well enough) that might actually be even more relevant to where you are today if you can find and understand them... but even the first book, particularly towards the end tying it all together and the social shift from gatheres to farmers, was a great philosophical jumping off point for me.

The first half is quite dry and I'm sure there is better material out there but this one did it for me back in the day. Hopefully it holds up still, and perhaps you'll find it interesting.

Also, that woman looks like some type of veterinary assistant or nurse. Definitely not a domestic housewife. If that's all you see when you see old photos of women, then you're sexist and need to check yourself.

Some more cruel, some just to boost sales. People are not evil by nature, but surely easily manipulated idiots.

If you just put something like "I hate how this glorifies the navy/army/ww2" before your rant, I'm sure people would understand where you're coming from and be more receptive to your message.

This patronising and disconnected type of commenting is not going to make any meaningful impact on the people receiving it - quite the opposite; you make people want to ignore you when you're being hostile out the gate for no reason.

If your goal is to make people turn off their ears and ignore anything you try to tell them, you're doing a splendid job though.