Technical Discussion

@evan @hongminhee just btw, long time ago sent a playground for deno/kv where I used `ulid` within the Activity Ids to achieve this. There is above FEP now …

I'm able to see your reply from Reddthat. I did not see the post upvote. I'm desiring to see !week-in-fediverse@activitypub.space and !general@activitypub.space in my subscriptions

@mariusor DID-based AP IDs are globally unique and resolvable. But the resolution algorithm is more complicated than that of HTTP URLs.@heluecht @julian

@silverpill @caohuak I wouldn't want to go that way either. Especially since our system isn't even created in a way to support this.

@evan I will try to keep it on my mind, when we eventuall have got a release. We included it in our upcoming release.BTW: I saw that tags.pub is working with it, so our implementation doesn't seem completely wrong here

If the context owner refuses to acknowledge any and all incoming replies, the thread is effectively locked.@julian That's correct. Context owner distributes approved activities to participants and also maintains a collection containing only approved activities. Replies (or reactions) that have not been approved are considered rejected.A similar mechanism exists in Interaction Policies but it is post-based rather than conversation-based, and with Accept activity instead of Add.Some FEP-171b implementations add canReply flag. I should probably mention it in the FEP but it is basically the color of the bike shed. The actual control mechanism is much more important.@technical-discussion @julian

@mario@hub.somaton.com @silverpill@mitra.social yeah, I get that if a top level proof is present, then the signature can be avoided. I just meant in the absence of a proof and signature, it's just noise.

@silverpill@mitra.social good point! The embedded object likely is unique.

@astro@c3d2.social yup, root cause was a regression I accidentally introduced a year ago (I missed a ! and borked a conditional) Really weird, sorry for wasting your time! https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/commit/57095a45e52e0c36c25b56003abfb59641a47df1

@edent@mastodon.social okay. Hello @example@example.viii.fi !

@julian wowowowow thank you. It will also help a handfull of other people who still have their single user mastodon instances set up like this. It used to be in the mastodon docs ages ago

Yes, this is normal and good.