To understand the modern American state, you have to look at what it learned to do at night.
-
Slave patrols weren’t marginal or reactive. They were the state’s most regular point of contact with white men. Patrol duty crossed class lines. Men without office or wealth exercised sovereign, bodily power—backed by statute. This wasn’t vigilantism. It was the state stripped to essentials.
2/7
Image: Mississippi slave patrol illustration. 1863. Author unknown. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_patrol#/media/File%3ASlave_Patrol.jpg
Patrols trained perception. Who walked too fast. Who hesitated. Which woods hid movement. How much pain controlled without killing. Violence wasn’t meant to be precise—it was meant to be ambient. White equality was rehearsed through Black unfreedom. Citizenship wasn’t just voted. It was practiced—at night, in motion, under color of law.
3/7
Image: 1851 Boston broadside warning Black residents to avoid police conversation (Library of Congress).n, 1851. Pdf. https://www.loc.gov/item/2021771790/.
-
Patrols trained perception. Who walked too fast. Who hesitated. Which woods hid movement. How much pain controlled without killing. Violence wasn’t meant to be precise—it was meant to be ambient. White equality was rehearsed through Black unfreedom. Citizenship wasn’t just voted. It was practiced—at night, in motion, under color of law.
3/7
Image: 1851 Boston broadside warning Black residents to avoid police conversation (Library of Congress).n, 1851. Pdf. https://www.loc.gov/item/2021771790/.
Patrols also disciplined whites. Poor, itinerant, noncompliant men were watched too. As Keri Leigh Merritt later shows, whiteness conferred privilege conditionally. Participation in coercion was one condition. By the 1830s, patrol laws expanded. Crisis didn’t invent repression—it exposed how foundational it already was. When secession came, the habits were ready.
4/7
Image: The Chinatown Squad in 1905.Photograph courtesy Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.
-
Patrols also disciplined whites. Poor, itinerant, noncompliant men were watched too. As Keri Leigh Merritt later shows, whiteness conferred privilege conditionally. Participation in coercion was one condition. By the 1830s, patrol laws expanded. Crisis didn’t invent repression—it exposed how foundational it already was. When secession came, the habits were ready.
4/7
Image: The Chinatown Squad in 1905.Photograph courtesy Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.
Intellectual Map
Davis, David Brion. The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770–1823. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975.
Fischer, David Hackett. Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Franklin, John Hope. The Militant South, 1800–1861. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956.
5/7
-
To understand the modern American state, you have to look at what it learned to do at night. In the slave South, violence didn’t arrive as spectacle. It arrived on schedule. Names checked. Horses assigned. Lanterns lit. By law, patrols could stop, search, whip, detain—without warrant or cause. Suspicion was enough. This wasn’t chaos. It was governance.
1/7
Image: 1823 illustration by Johann Moritz Rugendas. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Capitao-mato.jpg
@Deglassco That image description seems off, Dr. Glassco.
-
Intellectual Map
Davis, David Brion. The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770–1823. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975.
Fischer, David Hackett. Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Franklin, John Hope. The Militant South, 1800–1861. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956.
5/7
More sources
Genovese, Eugene D. Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made. New York: Pantheon Books, 1974.
Hadden, Sally E. Slave Patrols: Law and Violence in Virginia and the Carolinas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Merritt, Keri Leigh. Masterless Men: Poor Whites and Slavery in the Antebellum South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
6/7
-
More sources
Genovese, Eugene D. Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made. New York: Pantheon Books, 1974.
Hadden, Sally E. Slave Patrols: Law and Violence in Virginia and the Carolinas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Merritt, Keri Leigh. Masterless Men: Poor Whites and Slavery in the Antebellum South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
6/7
Final Sources
Morgan, Edmund S. American Slavery, American Freedom: The Ordeal of Colonial Virginia. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1975.
Woodard, Colin. American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America. New York: Viking, 2011.
Wyatt-Brown, Bertram. Honor and Violence in the Old South. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
7/7
-
@Deglassco That image description seems off, Dr. Glassco.
@tadbithuman which one?
-
Slave patrols weren’t marginal or reactive. They were the state’s most regular point of contact with white men. Patrol duty crossed class lines. Men without office or wealth exercised sovereign, bodily power—backed by statute. This wasn’t vigilantism. It was the state stripped to essentials.
2/7
Image: Mississippi slave patrol illustration. 1863. Author unknown. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_patrol#/media/File%3ASlave_Patrol.jpg
-
@tadbithuman which one?
@Deglassco @tadbithuman " illustration of a Black man on horseback, hands bound, punishment collar visible" that one, for me.
-
Final Sources
Morgan, Edmund S. American Slavery, American Freedom: The Ordeal of Colonial Virginia. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1975.
Woodard, Colin. American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America. New York: Viking, 2011.
Wyatt-Brown, Bertram. Honor and Violence in the Old South. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
7/7
Great thread.
️“Violence wasn’t meant to be precise—it was meant to be ambient.”
“…whiteness conferred privilege conditionally. Participation in coercion was one condition.”
And Black women aren’t even mentioned yet.
-
@tadbithuman which one?
@Deglassco thanks for the correction!
-
@Deglassco @tadbithuman " illustration of a Black man on horseback, hands bound, punishment collar visible" that one, for me.
@Deixis9 @tadbithuman Thank you. I amended it. Just simplified it. The character limit prevents me from explaining its relevance. In addition to being a striking image, it shows that slave policing was a transatlantic practice rather than a uniquely American one. This scene shows a Brazilian capitão do mato, a slave catcher who is Black, and really reminds us how systems of coercion could enlist non-white actors in enforcing slavery.
-
@Deixis9 @tadbithuman Thank you. I amended it. Just simplified it. The character limit prevents me from explaining its relevance. In addition to being a striking image, it shows that slave policing was a transatlantic practice rather than a uniquely American one. This scene shows a Brazilian capitão do mato, a slave catcher who is Black, and really reminds us how systems of coercion could enlist non-white actors in enforcing slavery.
@Deixis9 @tadbithuman Although some Black men in the United States also operated as drivers or catchers, American slave patrols were overwhelmingly white and legally embedded in local governance
-
R ActivityRelay shared this topic
-
Great thread.
️“Violence wasn’t meant to be precise—it was meant to be ambient.”
“…whiteness conferred privilege conditionally. Participation in coercion was one condition.”
And Black women aren’t even mentioned yet.
@nellie_m You’re absolutely right. Black women were living under the same violence as Black men with the added component of sexual coercion and constant surveillance that the law barely named but fully enabled. White women, meanwhile, were cast as people to be “protected,” something that helped justify patrol violence. Gender wasn’t separate from the system. It shaped how control worked and who it claimed to defend.
-
To understand the modern American state, you have to look at what it learned to do at night. In the slave South, violence didn’t arrive as spectacle. It arrived on schedule. Names checked. Horses assigned. Lanterns lit. By law, patrols could stop, search, whip, detain—without warrant or cause. Suspicion was enough. This wasn’t chaos. It was governance.
1/7
Image: 1823 illustration by Johann Moritz Rugendas. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Capitao-mato.jpg
I published this last week also addressing the topic from a historical approach, focusing on the first slave patrols in South Carolina. They pre-date the founding of the country by 80+ years.
https://buttondown.com/natebowling/archive/slave-patrols-and-ice-a-shared-history/
-
@nellie_m You’re absolutely right. Black women were living under the same violence as Black men with the added component of sexual coercion and constant surveillance that the law barely named but fully enabled. White women, meanwhile, were cast as people to be “protected,” something that helped justify patrol violence. Gender wasn’t separate from the system. It shaped how control worked and who it claimed to defend.
the patrols did to black women what they claimed black men would do to white women.
-
To understand the modern American state, you have to look at what it learned to do at night. In the slave South, violence didn’t arrive as spectacle. It arrived on schedule. Names checked. Horses assigned. Lanterns lit. By law, patrols could stop, search, whip, detain—without warrant or cause. Suspicion was enough. This wasn’t chaos. It was governance.
1/7
Image: 1823 illustration by Johann Moritz Rugendas. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Capitao-mato.jpg
@Deglassco
So they didn't learn anything in about 200 years. Sorry, I don't want to understand modern America, -
To understand the modern American state, you have to look at what it learned to do at night. In the slave South, violence didn’t arrive as spectacle. It arrived on schedule. Names checked. Horses assigned. Lanterns lit. By law, patrols could stop, search, whip, detain—without warrant or cause. Suspicion was enough. This wasn’t chaos. It was governance.
1/7
Image: 1823 illustration by Johann Moritz Rugendas. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Capitao-mato.jpg
@Deglassco Excelkent reminder of how governance has been used to justify targeted and deliberate
atrocities. And mystery never forget that the abolition of slavery in America did not stop the atrocities. The Nazis tooj their lessons from the Jim Crow south.https://www.history.com/articles/how-the-nazis-were-inspired-by-jim-crow
-
R AodeRelay shared this topic
️
