Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
13 Posts 13 Posters 27 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

    Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

    4,000 more sats approved.

    walfischbuchtW This user is from outside of this forum
    walfischbuchtW This user is from outside of this forum
    walfischbucht
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @sundogplanets

    Alban OsmaniA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

      Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

      4,000 more sats approved.

      Michael GemarM This user is from outside of this forum
      Michael GemarM This user is from outside of this forum
      Michael Gemar
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @sundogplanets Starlink is terrible, but it has also opened the floodgates. With other private constellations, military constellations, and China, things are going to get unsustainably crowded above us.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

        Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

        4,000 more sats approved.

        G This user is from outside of this forum
        G This user is from outside of this forum
        Gerrit πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸŒπŸ‰πŸ”»
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @sundogplanets

        Each of these operators holds Kesslers syndrome over the heads of the rest of the earth.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

          Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

          4,000 more sats approved.

          Al & Val's Modern HomesteadingA This user is from outside of this forum
          Al & Val's Modern HomesteadingA This user is from outside of this forum
          Al & Val's Modern Homesteading
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @sundogplanets We're safe from ever being discovered by alien life. We'll just be referenced as "that galactic garbage dump".

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • walfischbuchtW walfischbucht

            @sundogplanets

            Alban OsmaniA This user is from outside of this forum
            Alban OsmaniA This user is from outside of this forum
            Alban Osmani
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @walfischbucht @sundogplanets hi

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

              Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

              4,000 more sats approved.

              Eric LawtonE This user is from outside of this forum
              Eric LawtonE This user is from outside of this forum
              Eric Lawton
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @sundogplanets

              I'm old enough to remember the first satellite. Sputnik, 1957.

              I could tune my AM radio to hear it beep as it passed overhead.

              We've had so much benefit from them, for communications and sensing.

              70 years from proof of concept, through utility, to #enshittification.

              @bonaventuresoft

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

                4,000 more sats approved.

                Corb_The_LesserC This user is from outside of this forum
                Corb_The_LesserC This user is from outside of this forum
                Corb_The_Lesser
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @sundogplanets It's time to stop approving commercial satellite launches unless the applicants demonstrate the ability to remove each satellite from orbit in a way that isn't simply deorbiting the thing into the atmosphere.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                  Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

                  4,000 more sats approved.

                  BakersDozenB This user is from outside of this forum
                  BakersDozenB This user is from outside of this forum
                  BakersDozen
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @sundogplanets

                  Tragic. πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                    Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

                    4,000 more sats approved.

                    dasgrueneblattD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dasgrueneblattD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dasgrueneblatt
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    @sundogplanets ☹️

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                      Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

                      4,000 more sats approved.

                      Дими́трийS This user is from outside of this forum
                      Дими́трийS This user is from outside of this forum
                      Дими́трий
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @sundogplanets

                      these asshats are gonna block out the sun.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                        Well, that kind of sucks: https://www.engadget.com/science/space/a-potential-starlink-competitor-just-got-fcc-clearance-to-launch-4000-satellites-143905076.html

                        4,000 more sats approved.

                        β„›π‘œπ’·R This user is from outside of this forum
                        β„›π‘œπ’·R This user is from outside of this forum
                        β„›π‘œπ’·
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        @sundogplanets the Kessler syndrome edges ever closer

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups