Colorado pushing for age verification on the OS level https://www.pcmag.com/news/colorado-lawmakers-push-for-age-verification-at-the-operating-system-level
-
@cwebber I dont observe anyone dropping corporate social media en masse or cutting ties with the megacorps that actively disempower them and have for decades
@FelisCatusDomesticus @cwebber you can't exactly do that individually on a dime like that
-
@cwebber information is widely available in society.. kids simply don't care. they are more interested in Bad Bunny's superbowl performance than they are about higher issues. This is nothing new. Young people's trivial minds. It's a form of self-disempowerment. A phase everyone must pass through on the way to mature adulthood. That having been said, this proposed law is ludicrous.
@FelisCatusDomesticus @cwebber I didn't have a "trivial mind" at that age
-
@cwebber @demofox I keep getting this idea that all we need is a UEFI Boolean about whether the device is operated by a minor, and to require ID checks to prevent devices being sold to minors. Then parents can just pw protect the BIOS old school style, and if young Billy builds his own Linux kernel patching the device tree to always show adult the they win the porn prize. I suppose weβd need a solve for defaults reset, too, but doable.
-
@cwebber The big thing is the 3rd parties with whom the data is shared and who are likely sponsoring these bills.
The claim by the Colorado state legislators concerned is that this is designed to avoid sharing anything with 3rd parties.
They could simply oppose age verification software as the massive privacy violation that it is instead.
-
@cwebber holy fuck no. this is literally just pparents salty that their kids aren't buying into the shit parents are pushing, and even saltier that kids are, y'know, demanding rights
-
@fluffykittycat @cwebber better to do that than to let their kids have rights
-
@michael_w_busch @cwebber "SB26-051, introduced last month, would require operating systems to register the ownerβs age, which third-party apps can then leverage to determine if the user is an adult. The bill calls for the device owner to register their birthdate or age, but for the purposes of creating an βage bracket,β which can then be shared to an app developer through an API to learn their age range, according to BiometricUpdate.com."
It does say leverage and sharing with app developers.
-
@fluffykittycat @freya @cwebber Because otherwise their kid might end up becoming one of those got dang "home of sexuals" and that's literally the worst thing to ever possibly happen to anyone ever
-
@cwebber I dont observe anyone dropping corporate social media en masse or cutting ties with the megacorps that actively disempower them and have for decades
@FelisCatusDomesticus @cwebber This is true of adults as well as kids, though. The vast majority of people of all age groups are on corporate social media.
-
@fluffykittycat @freya @cwebber Because otherwise their kid might end up becoming one of those got dang "home of sexuals" and that's literally the worst thing to ever possibly happen to anyone ever
@aires @fluffykittycat @cwebber it's not just that, it's that their kid might do better than them. might change the world and make the world they (the parent) greww up in not exist anymore. and they hate that idea
-
@michael_w_busch @cwebber "SB26-051, introduced last month, would require operating systems to register the ownerβs age, which third-party apps can then leverage to determine if the user is an adult. The bill calls for the device owner to register their birthdate or age, but for the purposes of creating an βage bracket,β which can then be shared to an app developer through an API to learn their age range, according to BiometricUpdate.com."
It does say leverage and sharing with app developers.
Here is the proposed bill: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/SB26-051 .
Again; their claim is to allow sharing only an age flag rather than everyone's full ID getting leaked.
Which does nothing to resolve the more fundamental problem.
-
@FelisCatusDomesticus @neatchee @cwebber Got a source link?
-
Here is the proposed bill: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/SB26-051 .
Again; their claim is to allow sharing only an age flag rather than everyone's full ID getting leaked.
Which does nothing to resolve the more fundamental problem.
@michael_w_busch @cwebber Even if it only restricts by age being shared and doesn't exploit that, that is STILL a big boon for marketers and still invades privacy of all.
-
Colorado pushing for age verification on the OS level https://www.pcmag.com/news/colorado-lawmakers-push-for-age-verification-at-the-operating-system-level
Red alert! If this sounds like bad shit that's because IT IS
There was a time when the whole internet would be rallied against this stuff.....
@cwebber seems to me that this is evil, but a lesser evil than having to prove my age (actually my identity) to every site on the internet (which will then be pawned)
-
Colorado pushing for age verification on the OS level https://www.pcmag.com/news/colorado-lawmakers-push-for-age-verification-at-the-operating-system-level
Red alert! If this sounds like bad shit that's because IT IS
There was a time when the whole internet would be rallied against this stuff.....
-
@fluffykittycat @gorlak @cwebber indeed, and what about content regarding Wicca, or Islam? Where's the line and who decides it?
-
Colorado pushing for age verification on the OS level https://www.pcmag.com/news/colorado-lawmakers-push-for-age-verification-at-the-operating-system-level
Red alert! If this sounds like bad shit that's because IT IS
There was a time when the whole internet would be rallied against this stuff.....
@cwebber Thanks for promoting this. This is in committee next Tuesday, 24 February, and members of the public in CO can sign up to attest (it's SB26-051). It's accepted via in-person, Zoom, or written.
https://sites.coleg.gov/public-testimony/sign-up-to-testify/step-1
Other notes from the bill: a) This is sponsored by 2 Democrats; b) web-based usage is not included in this, only apps + app stores; c) enterprise apps are exempted; d) the cost for the state to update *its* apps to support this is $250k. π₯΄
-
@FelisCatusDomesticus @cwebber I didn't have a "trivial mind" at that age
so what?
-
@FelisCatusDomesticus @cwebber you can't exactly do that individually on a dime like that
yes you can.
social media in it's current form has existed less than 30 years.
humans have existed far longer than that.
viable options exist and have for years now.
there is no technical reason, only individual reasons and social ones and those are completely malleable. Most of my life there was no social media. It didn't exist.
-
@fluffykittycat @cwebber better to do that than to let their kids have rights
