Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’ve been thinking about this for days.

I’ve been thinking about this for days.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
16 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mhoyeM mhoye

    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

    (Via @jonathankoren )

    philosophizes whilst swimmingA This user is from outside of this forum
    philosophizes whilst swimmingA This user is from outside of this forum
    philosophizes whilst swimming
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    @jonathankoren @mhoye they’re all good algorithms, Brent

    jonathankoren™J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • philosophizes whilst swimmingA philosophizes whilst swimming

      @jonathankoren @mhoye they’re all good algorithms, Brent

      jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
      jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
      jonathankoren™
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

      eiriasE The DoctorD 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • mhoyeM mhoye

        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

        (Via @jonathankoren )

        groxxG This user is from outside of this forum
        groxxG This user is from outside of this forum
        groxx
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        @mhoye @jonathankoren it's branchless too, and easily parallelized onto a GPU to speed it up

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mhoyeM mhoye

          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

          (Via @jonathankoren )

          Ollie BoermansO This user is from outside of this forum
          Ollie BoermansO This user is from outside of this forum
          Ollie Boermans
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @mhoye @jonathankoren @daedalus I hope the crypto crew catch wind of this. Has potential to save a lot of electricity

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jonathankoren™J jonathankoren™

            @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

            eiriasE This user is from outside of this forum
            eiriasE This user is from outside of this forum
            eirias
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye this is like that weather aphorism, isn't it

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mhoyeM mhoye

              I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

              (Via @jonathankoren )

              Mark ReidM This user is from outside of this forum
              Mark ReidM This user is from outside of this forum
              Mark Reid
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @mhoye @jonathankoren @rmondello Surprising fact: exactly the same algorithm works even better for many other problems: perfect numbers, powers of two, busy beaver, etc.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mhoyeM mhoye

                I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                (Via @jonathankoren )

                Tom BortelsT This user is from outside of this forum
                Tom BortelsT This user is from outside of this forum
                Tom Bortels
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @jonathankoren @mhoye

                The problem is its inaccuracy for smaller input sets involving low-digit-count numbers.

                Trivially fixed by hardcoding the results for 3-digit and lower input. Ship it!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jonathankoren™J jonathankoren™

                  @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                  The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                  The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                  The Doctor
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                  mhoyeM jonathankoren™J 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • The DoctorD The Doctor

                    @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                    mhoyeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mhoyeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mhoye
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @drwho @jonathankoren @adardis It's such a good line.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mhoyeM mhoye

                      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                      (Via @jonathankoren )

                      cubeosC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cubeosC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cubeos
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @mhoye @jonathankoren It also provides the script for a math party trick: "Tell me any 100 digit number and I will tell you if it's prime!'

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • The DoctorD The Doctor

                        @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                        jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
                        jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
                        jonathankoren™
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        @drwho @adardis @mhoye why would I care?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups