Jack Dorsey skipped ActivityPub, built AtProto, lost Twitter, funded Bluesky, watched it become a company with VCs and a board, said it was "repeating all the mistakes," left, and now funds Nostr.

@thisismissem @mastodonmigration @quillmatiq @dansup @evan I appreciate this information, but my main interest in modern decentralized social media protocols is for social media (microblogging, as well as picture & video sharing), and I am not a developer - just a nerd. My primary concern in all of this is I simply don't trust Bluesky PBLLC. That's why complete and total independence from their infrastructure from a microblogging standpoint is important to me before I would ever consider using an ATproto-based service as my primary social media platform. While I'm okay using community resources for now, I *want* the ability to host my own completely independent full stack so I would never need to rely on a company or community to stand up a relay or AppView or something. I can do that easily and *cheaply* today with Mastodon or WAFRN (the ActivityPub side of it, anyway) or Pixelfed or Loops - it's not a big lift because these platforms were already designed with the full stack as a single deployment. This makes the network highly resistant to adversarial takeover, especially as things exist *right now*. It's a far, far, far bigger lift to stand up a similarly independent full stack of Bluesky (for example), and far far far easier for the majority of the network to be compromised if all statuses must be funneled through corporate or community chokepoints.

Tl;dr if I can't easily host a full stack that can run completely on it's own (while still being able to federate with others), that's not independence. *Every* service built on top of ActivityPub can give me that independence *by design*. It's the difference between human-scale networking and corporate-scale networking.

If there's an easy, lightweight, fully independent way for me to participate in Bluesky-compatible microblogging on ATproto with an experience that is comparable to what I'd get from using Bluesky directly, I'm interested to learn more - because I'm not currently aware of anything like that. I can get that from multiple platforms on AP *today*.

@thisismissem @mastodonmigration @quillmatiq @dansup @evan I appreciate this information, but my main interest in modern decentralized social media protocols is for social media (microblogging, as well as picture & video sharing), and I am not a developer - just a nerd. My primary concern in all of this is I simply don't trust Bluesky PBLLC. That's why complete and total independence from their infrastructure from a microblogging standpoint is important to me before I would ever consider using an ATproto-based service as my primary social media platform. While I'm okay using community resources for now, I *want* the ability to host my own completely independent full stack so I would never need to rely on a company or community to stand up a relay or AppView or something. I can do that easily and *cheaply* today with Mastodon or WAFRN (the ActivityPub side of it, anyway) or Pixelfed or Loops - it's not a big lift because these platforms were already designed with the full stack as a single deployment. This makes the network highly resistant to adversarial takeover, especially as things exist *right now*. It's a far, far, far bigger lift to stand up a similarly independent full stack of Bluesky (for example), and far far far easier for the majority of the network to be compromised if all statuses must be funneled through corporate or community chokepoints.

Tl;dr if I can't easily host a full stack that can run completely on it's own (while still being able to federate with others), that's not independence. *Every* service built on top of ActivityPub can give me that independence *by design*. It's the difference between human-scale networking and corporate-scale networking.

If there's an easy, lightweight, fully independent way for me to participate in Bluesky-compatible microblogging on ATproto with an experience that is comparable to what I'd get from using Bluesky directly, I'm interested to learn more - because I'm not currently aware of anything like that. I can get that from multiple platforms on AP *today*.

@baralheia Then use Blacksky or similar. They have their own PDS, their own Relay, their own Bluesky AppView, and to a degree own Moderation — they still do query the Bluesky Moderation Service for some stuff though.

So they are effectively entirely independent. They have done experiments with did:web too, though I think they're mostly using did:plc (not 100% sure).

But operating an entire global-scale network is expensive. Bluesky have stated that just generating following feeds is something like the majority of their infrastructure load. There are other projects that seek to not do global-scale, and instead have different tradeoffs.

With ActivityPub, you only have local-scale, which gives you a small perspective of the entire network. There are projects like fediscovery that are designed to facilitate sharing data across otherwise loosely federated boundaries, such that they can do near global scale things.

@quillmatiq @dansup I'm not trying to burn you, I promise! I know that you want to engender a culture of kindness and cooperation. I'm trying to suggest a more effective way of doing it: not by telling people they're bad, but by telling people why it's in their own interest to be better.

@baralheia it's also perfectly okay to not want global scale and be happy with local scale. That's a trade-off you get to decide with which platform or protocol you use.

@evan @dansup @quillmatiq interest is great and all, but understanding the social and power dynamics at play is more important.

Every time some leader of an ActivityPub project goes on a tirade against another protocol or project, all it does is hurt the entire ecosystem. It prevents productive partnerships, it creates friction and fights.

We've seen this countless times, and meanwhile majority of ActivityPub applications are not striving for ActivityPub interoperability, but for Mastodon interoperability.

There is so much power centralization in ActivityPub it's not funny, let's not forget that the protocol was left to rot by the W3C for the longest time, when it could've continued on-wards. The amount of infighting and politics here drives people away.

I've talked with folks who have really great ideas, and I've been like "come bring this to a standards meeting, this is really cool" and the response time and again is "I don't want to be involved with those people", because they've seen countless negative interactions.

Meanwhile, in AT Protocol, it's extremely common place to get different application developers and organisations to come together to standardise things, the best example is https://standard.site — I'm also helping a few developers work on interoperability for other things within the Atmosphere, because they realise that they're stronger together.

In ActivityPub there's been constant division "this software is better than that software", and petty little fights about "this isn't really activitypub because it doesn't do what mastodon does, so it doesn't interoperate fully" — Dan was the target of one such hit piece.

The office hours that the bluesky team run every two weeks? They basically entirely focus on sharing and promoting the cool work by other people in the ecosystem, here's some notes from the latest: https://bsky.app/profile/thisismissem.social/post/3mere5l7knk2n

I've mentioned it before, but I've stopped actively contributing to Mastodon because the lack of respect that they show other contributors is so dire that it's not financially viable for me to contribute.

@sheislaurence That is an awesome question. I'm not sure!

There's a good landing page here with a lot of links to explore.

https://bmannconsulting.com/notes/atprotocol/

@reflex @dansup @quillmatiq

@sheislaurence That is an awesome question. I'm not sure!

There's a good landing page here with a lot of links to explore.

https://bmannconsulting.com/notes/atprotocol/

@reflex @dansup @quillmatiq

@thisismissem @baralheia

It would seem like this 'global scale' difficulty relates to the aforesaid 'quadratic scaling' issue raised by @cwebber

If, in fact this is true, it is very hard to see how the protocol is actually viable as a broadly decentralized protocol.

Would love to have someone knowledgeable address this.

https://mastodon.online/@mastodonmigration/116064809568107112

@thisismissem @evan @dansup @quillmatiq and for my MassiveWiki project I want both AT and AP interop. I think we just need a few bridges to use and experiment with. (nonetheless, he persists)

@evan @boris @reflex @dansup @quillmatiq will you forgive me cos I asked Gemini: Destroy as suitable. Under dependency challenges, it says:
- Identity Dependency: did:plc directory Bsky owned
- "Centralized Indexing: users can host their own PDS, but rely on "relays" to discover other users. Currently, the main relay is operated by Bky. Replacing this requires significant compute power."
- "Atproto's adoption depends on it having a "killer app" other than the initial microblogging client"

@mastodonmigration @baralheia @cwebber no, I mean, processing 2.4 billion posts, 3.4 billion follows, and 13.6 billion likes is a metric shittone of data to process. Serving up feeds to 42 million users (10-15 million monthly active) requires a lot of processing.

Stats from: https://bsky.jazco.dev/stats

It's not even talking about communication at a network layer between PDSes, Relays, and AppViews. That's a different matter, which is where Christine was mostly talking, iirc.

@thisismissem @baralheia @cwebber

Hmmm... please excuse the layman's understanding of these matters, but it does seem like this relates to traffic at the network layer. What you are saying is that the difficulty for the smaller instance in scaling is "serving up feeds for 42 million users." With ActivityPub the first request would transfer a single copy to a cache on the requesting instance and subsequent requests would not generate any traffic. This is why AP is able to scale linearly.

@mastodonmigration @baralheia @cwebber so ingesting all the data for Bluesky does take time & resources, but it is doable: @FedicaHQ have actually done this, as have Blacksky. There's probably others too.

The AppView acts as a cache for this data. The cost is due to the sheer scale of the dataset, and in computing the feeds & notifications for however many million users.

The other cost is CDN and Moderation, which are kinda expensive at scale, however, definitely aren't costs unfamiliar for AP servers too.

Mastodon does an interesting design choice by stopping producing feeds for users that haven't been active for a while.

There's also been plenty of fediverse applications that have had issues with feed generation (Firefish, Hollo, and others have had issues in the past if memory serves).

So yeah, if you only need to serve feeds for say a dozen users and don't need the full network's worth of data, then it's cheaper.

But the article that Christine wrote was more about the network bandwidth between the components and how that scales. Which is a very different matter.

@mastodonmigration @baralheia @cwebber An AppView typically consumes data from a single full-network relay, with failover. A PDS typically has subscriptions from 1 or more relays for data. There are also some relays that just consume other relays.

Adding more PDSes means more connections for relays, adding more relays means more subscriptions to individual PDSes for data.

There's like, a dozen or so relays operating in full-network mode, as far as I know, and relays don't do archival anymore, which was the largest cost.

@sheislaurence did:plc is spinning out to an independent org, relays are only necessary for things at scale (& aren’t used for user discovery), and relays currently cost $20/month for 42M accounts.

I presented at Fedicon last year about a selection of the many apps being built https://bmannconsulting.com/notes/beyond-microblogging-atproto/

For completeness, because of account architecture, ATProto doesn’t have a private data option today.

@mastodonmigration @baralheia @cwebber An AppView typically consumes data from a single full-network relay, with failover. A PDS typically has subscriptions from 1 or more relays for data. There are also some relays that just consume other relays.

Adding more PDSes means more connections for relays, adding more relays means more subscriptions to individual PDSes for data.

There's like, a dozen or so relays operating in full-network mode, as far as I know, and relays don't do archival anymore, which was the largest cost.

@thisismissem @baralheia @cwebber

Still not seeing it. On the ingest side, traffic should only be proportional to total users on that node. If a node is smaller it should only generate network data traffic to service its own users. Actually less than that due to caching.

The beauty of AP seems to be precisely that it uses caching to enable individual nodes to scale storage and processing linearly both as regards serving and ingesting data.