Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. My experience with generative-AI has been that, at its very best, it is subtly wrong in ways that only an expert in the relevant subject would recognise.

My experience with generative-AI has been that, at its very best, it is subtly wrong in ways that only an expert in the relevant subject would recognise.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
56 Posts 29 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

    My experience with generative-AI has been that, at its very best, it is subtly wrong in ways that only an expert in the relevant subject would recognise. So I don't worry about us creating super-intelligent AI, I worry about us allowing that expertise to atrophy through laziness and greed. I refuse to use LLMs not because I'm scared of how clever they are, but because I do not wish to become stupider.

    Ellipsis... 🇨🇦T This user is from outside of this forum
    Ellipsis... 🇨🇦T This user is from outside of this forum
    Ellipsis... 🇨🇦
    wrote last edited by
    #37

    @jonathanhogg this is nicely put.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R AodeRelay shared this topic
    • Magneto was rightP Magneto was right

      @jonathanhogg

      "planet-boiling roulette wheel" is the name of my upcoming experimental jazzcore EP

      ChaosT This user is from outside of this forum
      ChaosT This user is from outside of this forum
      Chaos
      wrote last edited by
      #38

      @pikesley @jonathanhogg looking forward to watching them at EMF later this year

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

        My experience with generative-AI has been that, at its very best, it is subtly wrong in ways that only an expert in the relevant subject would recognise. So I don't worry about us creating super-intelligent AI, I worry about us allowing that expertise to atrophy through laziness and greed. I refuse to use LLMs not because I'm scared of how clever they are, but because I do not wish to become stupider.

        Kevin RussellK This user is from outside of this forum
        Kevin RussellK This user is from outside of this forum
        Kevin Russell
        wrote last edited by
        #39

        @jonathanhogg

        The big problem isn't people allowing AI into their work. They should fight back, you're exactly right.

        The big problem is tech bros dont care, they BOUGHT ALL the Ram, they bought ALL the hard drives on the planet.

        They intend -> no choice, there will be no allow or not allow, they are building an AI prison around earth.

        They bought all the hard drives.

        They bought all the ram

        https://www.mooreslawisdead.com/post/sam-altman-s-dirty-dram-deal

        AI is prison.

        #ai #AIisPRISON #techbroligarchy #resist #dems #nokings

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

          You know what? HyperCard was a glorious moment in time that I dearly miss: an army of non-experts were bashing together and sharing weird and wonderful stacks that were part 'zine, part adventure game and part database. Instead of laughing at vibe-coders, maybe we should ask ourselves why the current state-of-the-art in beginner-friendly programming tools is a planet-boiling roulette wheel.

          jon ⚝Y This user is from outside of this forum
          jon ⚝Y This user is from outside of this forum
          jon ⚝
          wrote last edited by
          #40

          @jonathanhogg
          Help us get the federated wiki there.

          It is more than a successor in spirit to HyperCard.

          You would be surprised to learn about what #FedWiki does.

          http://next.ward.dojo.fed.wiki/what-wiki-does.html

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

            @jarkman I can absolutely bend your ear at EMF, but conveniently I also recently gave a talk about it at Alpaca! 😀

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9khHD9sB7M&list=PLxqmZjMvoVzw773-Fo9ajkujFfOThuFOP&index=9

            Graham KG This user is from outside of this forum
            Graham KG This user is from outside of this forum
            Graham K
            wrote last edited by
            #41

            @jarkman @jonathanhogg Would love to have my ear bent about Flitter at EMF 😀. Are you planning to do your talk there? (I guess there’s that YouTube you posted, but I kind of like live performance 😜)

            Jonathan HoggJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

              I will say one thing for generative AI: since these tools function by remixing/translating existing information, that vibe programming is so popular demonstrates a colossal failure on the part of our industry in not making this stuff easier. If a giant ball of statistics can mostly knock up a working app in minutes, this shows not that gen-AI is insanely clever, but that most of the work in making an app has always been stupid. We have gatekeeped programming behind vast walls of nonsense.

              dieTasseD This user is from outside of this forum
              dieTasseD This user is from outside of this forum
              dieTasse
              wrote last edited by
              #42

              @jonathanhogg
              Feel free to devise non-gatekept programming 😀

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Graham KG Graham K

                @jarkman @jonathanhogg Would love to have my ear bent about Flitter at EMF 😀. Are you planning to do your talk there? (I guess there’s that YouTube you posted, but I kind of like live performance 😜)

                Jonathan HoggJ This user is from outside of this forum
                Jonathan HoggJ This user is from outside of this forum
                Jonathan Hogg
                wrote last edited by
                #43

                @gklyne @jarkman I wasn’t planning to. As a team lead I’m not supposed to put myself up for a talk as well, though I think that’s more of a guideline than a rule…

                Graham KG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

                  @jarkman I can absolutely bend your ear at EMF, but conveniently I also recently gave a talk about it at Alpaca! 😀

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9khHD9sB7M&list=PLxqmZjMvoVzw773-Fo9ajkujFfOThuFOP&index=9

                  jarkmanJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jarkmanJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jarkman
                  wrote last edited by
                  #44

                  @jonathanhogg Thanks! I'll absorb that and then I can ask you better questions at EMF.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                  • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

                    You know what? HyperCard was a glorious moment in time that I dearly miss: an army of non-experts were bashing together and sharing weird and wonderful stacks that were part 'zine, part adventure game and part database. Instead of laughing at vibe-coders, maybe we should ask ourselves why the current state-of-the-art in beginner-friendly programming tools is a planet-boiling roulette wheel.

                    Owl EyesD This user is from outside of this forum
                    Owl EyesD This user is from outside of this forum
                    Owl Eyes
                    wrote last edited by
                    #45

                    @jonathanhogg lazarus still exists, as a faint remanent of those times

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

                      @gklyne @jarkman I wasn’t planning to. As a team lead I’m not supposed to put myself up for a talk as well, though I think that’s more of a guideline than a rule…

                      Graham KG This user is from outside of this forum
                      Graham KG This user is from outside of this forum
                      Graham K
                      wrote last edited by
                      #46

                      @jonathanhogg @jarkman Ack. Having now watched, I think your Alpaca talk is a pretty good intro. I see some resonance in your approach with OpenSCAD (different goals, of course).

                      Jonathan HoggJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

                        I will say one thing for generative AI: since these tools function by remixing/translating existing information, that vibe programming is so popular demonstrates a colossal failure on the part of our industry in not making this stuff easier. If a giant ball of statistics can mostly knock up a working app in minutes, this shows not that gen-AI is insanely clever, but that most of the work in making an app has always been stupid. We have gatekeeped programming behind vast walls of nonsense.

                        LauraC This user is from outside of this forum
                        LauraC This user is from outside of this forum
                        Laura
                        wrote last edited by
                        #47

                        @jonathanhogg that's an interesting take. wouldn't that mean the same applies to art then?

                        Software development is in my opinion a creative task, and "AI" has shown that people will take shortcuts to get "results" faster just to get the recognition. I think the problem might be more in impatience and how our society doesn't allow things to take time.

                        Jonathan HoggJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Graham KG Graham K

                          @jonathanhogg @jarkman Ack. Having now watched, I think your Alpaca talk is a pretty good intro. I see some resonance in your approach with OpenSCAD (different goals, of course).

                          Jonathan HoggJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          Jonathan HoggJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          Jonathan Hogg
                          wrote last edited by
                          #48

                          @gklyne @jarkman yes, there’s definite parallels with OpenSCAD that I was unaware of when I originally created it. I am (constantly) on the verge of developing a new take on Flitter and I mean to explore that further

                          Graham KG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

                            We seem to have largely stopped innovating on trying to lower barriers to programming in favour of creating endless new frameworks and libraries for a vanishingly small number of near-identical languages. It is the mid-2020s and people are wringing their hands over Rust as if it was some inexplicable new thing rather than a C-derivative that incorporates decades old type theory. You know what I consider to be genuinely ground-breaking programming tools? VisiCalc, HyperCard and Scratch.

                            Solar🌄GardenW This user is from outside of this forum
                            Solar🌄GardenW This user is from outside of this forum
                            Solar🌄Garden
                            wrote last edited by
                            #49

                            @jonathanhogg

                            @warmsignull [thread]

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

                              @dasgrueneblatt I think you have misunderstood me: I think vibe coding is a horrendous problem, but it is a symptom of an industry failing. That people are trying to steer a tank with a speak'n'spell is because we have not made decent bikes.

                              Solar🌄GardenW This user is from outside of this forum
                              Solar🌄GardenW This user is from outside of this forum
                              Solar🌄Garden
                              wrote last edited by
                              #50

                              @jonathanhogg

                              " That people are trying to steer a tank with a speak'n'spell is because we have not made decent bikes." -- if we look at the real-world situation of your metaphor, we see that when "decent bikes" ARE finally here, the establishment begins to gatekeep and legislate against them /because/ they are too effective, at overturning the status quo - ostensibly on the grounds that they are "dangerous" when in the wrong hands.

                              Wondering if the analogy feeds back in the other direction too.

                              @dasgrueneblatt

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • LauraC Laura

                                @jonathanhogg that's an interesting take. wouldn't that mean the same applies to art then?

                                Software development is in my opinion a creative task, and "AI" has shown that people will take shortcuts to get "results" faster just to get the recognition. I think the problem might be more in impatience and how our society doesn't allow things to take time.

                                Jonathan HoggJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Jonathan HoggJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Jonathan Hogg
                                wrote last edited by
                                #51

                                @codingcatgirl Thanks for this! As someone who has also called themself an artist for over a decade, I have a lot of thoughts on this too, but perhaps I need to mull for a bit and then start a new thread. I’ll drop you a link when I start posting

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

                                  You know what? HyperCard was a glorious moment in time that I dearly miss: an army of non-experts were bashing together and sharing weird and wonderful stacks that were part 'zine, part adventure game and part database. Instead of laughing at vibe-coders, maybe we should ask ourselves why the current state-of-the-art in beginner-friendly programming tools is a planet-boiling roulette wheel.

                                  rojunR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rojunR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rojun
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #52

                                  @jonathanhogg Scratch is excellent. My kid's been using it. I used hypercard at his age and it was a lot fun.

                                  Had it not been because our teacher had acquired two macs into the class, and we could spend time before and after school, I don't think it would have been as fun. It's not just the tools, but also the environment and culture.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

                                    @gklyne @jarkman yes, there’s definite parallels with OpenSCAD that I was unaware of when I originally created it. I am (constantly) on the verge of developing a new take on Flitter and I mean to explore that further

                                    Graham KG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Graham KG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Graham K
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #53

                                    @jarkman @jonathanhogg Several years ago, I played around with using Haskell as a substrate for a DSL. Used a combinator parser (Parsec) to spit out a directly executable “compiled” function. I’ve occasionally thought it would be fun to do something similar for CSG.

                                    Jonathan HoggJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Graham KG Graham K

                                      @jarkman @jonathanhogg Several years ago, I played around with using Haskell as a substrate for a DSL. Used a combinator parser (Parsec) to spit out a directly executable “compiled” function. I’ve occasionally thought it would be fun to do something similar for CSG.

                                      Jonathan HoggJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Jonathan HoggJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Jonathan Hogg
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #54

                                      @gklyne @jarkman I think CSG is a fantastic fit with functional/declarative languages. I added the support for Manifold to Flitter as a speculative exercise and only then discovered that it was an incredibly powerful tool for things I was trying to achieve

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Jonathan HoggJ Jonathan Hogg

                                        My experience with generative-AI has been that, at its very best, it is subtly wrong in ways that only an expert in the relevant subject would recognise. So I don't worry about us creating super-intelligent AI, I worry about us allowing that expertise to atrophy through laziness and greed. I refuse to use LLMs not because I'm scared of how clever they are, but because I do not wish to become stupider.

                                        PaitP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        PaitP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Pait
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #55

                                        @jonathanhogg At worst, it's screamingly wrong in a way that only someone knowledgeable will recognize. Thus chatbots become a source of disinformation.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Reginald BraithwaiteR Reginald Braithwaite

                                          @jonathanhogg Afterward:

                                          The program manager eventually left the company, and the team immediately rewrote the editor in Java/Swing. It took a summer, but now the company could brag that it used Java exclusively to write tools for Java.

                                          I certainly never met a customer who cared whether the editor was written in Java. For that matter, nobody cared that the core analysis engine was written in C++.

                                          Programming is a pop culture.

                                          rojunR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rojunR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rojun
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #56

                                          @raganwald @jonathanhogg Well... The only reason I would care if the editor is written in Java vs Electron vs C++ is that I would notice how the memory got hogged, or the UI would think for minutes, or - rarely - it would be almost immediate (albeit missing half of the features and sometimes crashing completely).

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups