I made the claim that the FBI declared the Black Panthers dangerous, not because they were Black nationalists or supremacists.

Here's the ironic part:

I am Black. But by any reasonable definition of the term, I am wealthy. No matter how much you might hear me complain about silly things like how expensive EVs in the US are, or the cost of health insurance, or the price of gas, or the price of eggs, or Bay Area real estate prices, or college student loan debt, or prescription drug prices, or my stonks.‍️

I am Black and wealthy.

So the important question: if you are poor and white, do Fred Hampton and the Black Panthers see themselves as more aligned with your struggle, or mine?

When Fred Hampton said he wanted a revolution, was he talking about overthrowing you, or overthrowing me?

When he talked about "Getting in the streets," was he talking about hurting me? Or helping you, by giving your kids free vaccines and free school lunch?

Are his "dangerous ideas" more dangerous for you? Or for me?

Is he my "messiah" or yours?

@mekkaokereke really love these thought provoking posts from you. Just

You don't have to agree with 100% of what Fred Hampton or the Black Panthers said or did.

And you shouldn't change any of your core values because of anything he says. Not one.

My question is: how many of his core beliefs, and the beliefs of the Black Panthers, align with your core beliefs?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tF7_2VckKNQ&t=504s

This is the most dangerous thought that the Panthers vocalized:

"We don't fight fire with fire. We fight fire with water. We don't fight racism with more racism. We fight racism with solidarity."

"No matter what color you are, there's only two classes.... But this class has divided itself..."

I made the claim that the FBI declared the Black Panthers dangerous, not because they were Black nationalists or supremacists. They weren't.

They were dangerous because they preached racial *solidarity*.

But don't take my word for it!

Listen to Fred Hampton's own words.

Turn on closed captions.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tF7_2VckKNQ

@mekkaokereke I think Fred Hampton understood the difference between wealthy working class, and the Capitalidt class - You're safe.

@Reddog

Unfortunately, no. On this point, Fred Hampton and many of his followers (some of whom are close friends!), and I disagree. It's OK to disagree!

My position is that it is possible to separate capitalism from racism, and possible to separate trade and commerce from capitalism. My position is that owning property and renting it to other people to live in, is not only not evil, but can be good. My position is that owning entire companies, or shares in companies, is not necessarily evil. Yes I'm an employee. But I also own shares in many companies, and have owned entire other companies. I own land. I've been CEO of companies with hundreds of employees, vendors, and contractors. I help startup companies. My position is that rich people that are evil and sociopathic, are more dangerous to poor people than rich people that are kind and pro-social. My position is that history has shown that socialism with evil leadership, is just as harmful as capitalism with evil leadership, so the most important dimension is "evil." My position is that allowing capitalism to influence politics, has created the horrific feedback loop where instead of politicians causing capital to be applied for the good of society, capital influences politicians at the expense of society.

Fred Hampton would call me a "Black capitalist," which he viewed as a self-defeating half measure. He would argue that it is not coincidental that racism and capitalism were invented at basically the same time. He would say that separating ownership of a company from labor in a company, inevitably leads to sociopathic outcomes, the only degree is "how much, how soon." He would say that's irrelevant, because the real answer will always be "a little more than last year." He would say that we are aligned on only the most obvious of things: (fascism bad! Vaccines good!) but that I'm not ready for the big change needed to move society forwards: letting go of capitalism for socialism. He would argue that whether a wealthy person is kind or evil, is irrelevant to the harms done by the very existence of wealthy people in the first place. A kind elephant that makes a mistake, or a malevolent elephant that sits on you on purpose, squashes you just the same.

@Reddog

Unfortunately, no. On this point, Fred Hampton and many of his followers (some of whom are close friends!), and I disagree. It's OK to disagree!

My position is that it is possible to separate capitalism from racism, and possible to separate trade and commerce from capitalism. My position is that owning property and renting it to other people to live in, is not only not evil, but can be good. My position is that owning entire companies, or shares in companies, is not necessarily evil. Yes I'm an employee. But I also own shares in many companies, and have owned entire other companies. I own land. I've been CEO of companies with hundreds of employees, vendors, and contractors. I help startup companies. My position is that rich people that are evil and sociopathic, are more dangerous to poor people than rich people that are kind and pro-social. My position is that history has shown that socialism with evil leadership, is just as harmful as capitalism with evil leadership, so the most important dimension is "evil." My position is that allowing capitalism to influence politics, has created the horrific feedback loop where instead of politicians causing capital to be applied for the good of society, capital influences politicians at the expense of society.

Fred Hampton would call me a "Black capitalist," which he viewed as a self-defeating half measure. He would argue that it is not coincidental that racism and capitalism were invented at basically the same time. He would say that separating ownership of a company from labor in a company, inevitably leads to sociopathic outcomes, the only degree is "how much, how soon." He would say that's irrelevant, because the real answer will always be "a little more than last year." He would say that we are aligned on only the most obvious of things: (fascism bad! Vaccines good!) but that I'm not ready for the big change needed to move society forwards: letting go of capitalism for socialism. He would argue that whether a wealthy person is kind or evil, is irrelevant to the harms done by the very existence of wealthy people in the first place. A kind elephant that makes a mistake, or a malevolent elephant that sits on you on purpose, squashes you just the same.

You don't have to agree with 100% of what Fred Hampton or the Black Panthers said or did.

And you shouldn't change any of your core values because of anything he says. Not one.

My question is: how many of his core beliefs, and the beliefs of the Black Panthers, align with your core beliefs?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tF7_2VckKNQ&t=504s

This is the most dangerous thought that the Panthers vocalized:

"We don't fight fire with fire. We fight fire with water. We don't fight racism with more racism. We fight racism with solidarity."

"No matter what color you are, there's only two classes.... But this class has divided itself..."

Here's the ironic part:

I am Black. But by any reasonable definition of the term, I am wealthy. No matter how much you might hear me complain about silly things like how expensive EVs in the US are, or the cost of health insurance, or the price of gas, or the price of eggs, or Bay Area real estate prices, or college student loan debt, or prescription drug prices, or my stonks.‍️

I am Black and wealthy.

So the important question: if you are poor and white, do Fred Hampton and the Black Panthers see themselves as more aligned with your struggle, or mine?

When Fred Hampton said he wanted a revolution, was he talking about overthrowing you, or overthrowing me?

When he talked about "Getting in the streets," was he talking about hurting me? Or helping you, by giving your kids free vaccines and free school lunch?

Are his "dangerous ideas" more dangerous for you? Or for me?

Is he my "messiah" or yours?

@mekkaokereke Fred Hampton's ability to connect class struggle across races is what made him so dangerous, why they killed him.

As an undergrad, my student group hosted a Fred Hampton Day (each year, I think).

We mostly got puzzled looks at our posters that said "I am Fred Hampton." Except for the people that appeared there as part of CIA programs (this was in DC). They were not puzzled, I don't think.

@D_J_Nathanson @mekkaokereke my kids last year got a new understanding of the BPP when we visited Alcatraz: they practiced solidarity standing with the Native American occupation of the island.

Here's the ironic part:

I am Black. But by any reasonable definition of the term, I am wealthy. No matter how much you might hear me complain about silly things like how expensive EVs in the US are, or the cost of health insurance, or the price of gas, or the price of eggs, or Bay Area real estate prices, or college student loan debt, or prescription drug prices, or my stonks.‍️

I am Black and wealthy.

So the important question: if you are poor and white, do Fred Hampton and the Black Panthers see themselves as more aligned with your struggle, or mine?

When Fred Hampton said he wanted a revolution, was he talking about overthrowing you, or overthrowing me?

When he talked about "Getting in the streets," was he talking about hurting me? Or helping you, by giving your kids free vaccines and free school lunch?

Are his "dangerous ideas" more dangerous for you? Or for me?

Is he my "messiah" or yours?

@mekkaokereke Fred Hampton's ability to connect class struggle across races is what made him so dangerous, why they killed him.

As an undergrad, my student group hosted a Fred Hampton Day (each year, I think).

We mostly got puzzled looks at our posters that said "I am Fred Hampton." Except for the people that appeared there as part of CIA programs (this was in DC). They were not puzzled, I don't think.

@mekkaokereke @Reddog

I agree with Hampton and suggest we need law that limits the size of wealth and outlaws monopolies, prioriizes small businesses that provide goods, and funds public arts and science so everyone can benefit and enjoy. Eliminating the elephant, benign or not, makes it easier to gain a fair share for all the other sizes of existance. I have worked in a corporation, run my own small business, and I farm. The sastem is geared toward growth. Get big or get out they tell you. That has to change. There is no way to downsize that philosophy. Its unnatural. Natural systems are robust because they 'waste' resources by having multiple redundant feedback loops and participants.

@Reddog

Unfortunately, no. On this point, Fred Hampton and many of his followers (some of whom are close friends!), and I disagree. It's OK to disagree!

My position is that it is possible to separate capitalism from racism, and possible to separate trade and commerce from capitalism. My position is that owning property and renting it to other people to live in, is not only not evil, but can be good. My position is that owning entire companies, or shares in companies, is not necessarily evil. Yes I'm an employee. But I also own shares in many companies, and have owned entire other companies. I own land. I've been CEO of companies with hundreds of employees, vendors, and contractors. I help startup companies. My position is that rich people that are evil and sociopathic, are more dangerous to poor people than rich people that are kind and pro-social. My position is that history has shown that socialism with evil leadership, is just as harmful as capitalism with evil leadership, so the most important dimension is "evil." My position is that allowing capitalism to influence politics, has created the horrific feedback loop where instead of politicians causing capital to be applied for the good of society, capital influences politicians at the expense of society.

Fred Hampton would call me a "Black capitalist," which he viewed as a self-defeating half measure. He would argue that it is not coincidental that racism and capitalism were invented at basically the same time. He would say that separating ownership of a company from labor in a company, inevitably leads to sociopathic outcomes, the only degree is "how much, how soon." He would say that's irrelevant, because the real answer will always be "a little more than last year." He would say that we are aligned on only the most obvious of things: (fascism bad! Vaccines good!) but that I'm not ready for the big change needed to move society forwards: letting go of capitalism for socialism. He would argue that whether a wealthy person is kind or evil, is irrelevant to the harms done by the very existence of wealthy people in the first place. A kind elephant that makes a mistake, or a malevolent elephant that sits on you on purpose, squashes you just the same.

@mekkaokereke @Reddog

I suggest that if you think capitalism is good, then you don't understand what is meant by it by the people who invented the word and the people who analyze its function today calling it evil.

The following paper by economists from anarchist tradition (different from Hampton's Marxist one) suggest that Capitalism is, properly understood, an extortion racket.

https://bnarchives.net/id/eprint/760/3/20230100_bn_the_business_of_strategic_sabotage.html

I made the claim that the FBI declared the Black Panthers dangerous, not because they were Black nationalists or supremacists. They weren't.

They were dangerous because they preached racial *solidarity*.

But don't take my word for it!

Listen to Fred Hampton's own words.

Turn on closed captions.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tF7_2VckKNQ

@Reddog

Unfortunately, no. On this point, Fred Hampton and many of his followers (some of whom are close friends!), and I disagree. It's OK to disagree!

My position is that it is possible to separate capitalism from racism, and possible to separate trade and commerce from capitalism. My position is that owning property and renting it to other people to live in, is not only not evil, but can be good. My position is that owning entire companies, or shares in companies, is not necessarily evil. Yes I'm an employee. But I also own shares in many companies, and have owned entire other companies. I own land. I've been CEO of companies with hundreds of employees, vendors, and contractors. I help startup companies. My position is that rich people that are evil and sociopathic, are more dangerous to poor people than rich people that are kind and pro-social. My position is that history has shown that socialism with evil leadership, is just as harmful as capitalism with evil leadership, so the most important dimension is "evil." My position is that allowing capitalism to influence politics, has created the horrific feedback loop where instead of politicians causing capital to be applied for the good of society, capital influences politicians at the expense of society.

Fred Hampton would call me a "Black capitalist," which he viewed as a self-defeating half measure. He would argue that it is not coincidental that racism and capitalism were invented at basically the same time. He would say that separating ownership of a company from labor in a company, inevitably leads to sociopathic outcomes, the only degree is "how much, how soon." He would say that's irrelevant, because the real answer will always be "a little more than last year." He would say that we are aligned on only the most obvious of things: (fascism bad! Vaccines good!) but that I'm not ready for the big change needed to move society forwards: letting go of capitalism for socialism. He would argue that whether a wealthy person is kind or evil, is irrelevant to the harms done by the very existence of wealthy people in the first place. A kind elephant that makes a mistake, or a malevolent elephant that sits on you on purpose, squashes you just the same.

You don't have to agree with 100% of what Fred Hampton or the Black Panthers said or did.

And you shouldn't change any of your core values because of anything he says. Not one.

My question is: how many of his core beliefs, and the beliefs of the Black Panthers, align with your core beliefs?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tF7_2VckKNQ&t=504s

This is the most dangerous thought that the Panthers vocalized:

"We don't fight fire with fire. We fight fire with water. We don't fight racism with more racism. We fight racism with solidarity."

"No matter what color you are, there's only two classes.... But this class has divided itself..."

@Reddog

Unfortunately, no. On this point, Fred Hampton and many of his followers (some of whom are close friends!), and I disagree. It's OK to disagree!

My position is that it is possible to separate capitalism from racism, and possible to separate trade and commerce from capitalism. My position is that owning property and renting it to other people to live in, is not only not evil, but can be good. My position is that owning entire companies, or shares in companies, is not necessarily evil. Yes I'm an employee. But I also own shares in many companies, and have owned entire other companies. I own land. I've been CEO of companies with hundreds of employees, vendors, and contractors. I help startup companies. My position is that rich people that are evil and sociopathic, are more dangerous to poor people than rich people that are kind and pro-social. My position is that history has shown that socialism with evil leadership, is just as harmful as capitalism with evil leadership, so the most important dimension is "evil." My position is that allowing capitalism to influence politics, has created the horrific feedback loop where instead of politicians causing capital to be applied for the good of society, capital influences politicians at the expense of society.

Fred Hampton would call me a "Black capitalist," which he viewed as a self-defeating half measure. He would argue that it is not coincidental that racism and capitalism were invented at basically the same time. He would say that separating ownership of a company from labor in a company, inevitably leads to sociopathic outcomes, the only degree is "how much, how soon." He would say that's irrelevant, because the real answer will always be "a little more than last year." He would say that we are aligned on only the most obvious of things: (fascism bad! Vaccines good!) but that I'm not ready for the big change needed to move society forwards: letting go of capitalism for socialism. He would argue that whether a wealthy person is kind or evil, is irrelevant to the harms done by the very existence of wealthy people in the first place. A kind elephant that makes a mistake, or a malevolent elephant that sits on you on purpose, squashes you just the same.