Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular.

There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
8 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)D This user is from outside of this forum
    David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)D This user is from outside of this forum
    David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

    DJGummikuhD Jake Hildreth (acorn) :blacker_heart_outline:H FediThing :progress_pride:F socS Adam Trickett :debian: :kde:D 6 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)D David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

      There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

      DJGummikuhD This user is from outside of this forum
      DJGummikuhD This user is from outside of this forum
      DJGummikuh
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @david_chisnall *chuckles in IPv6*

      ✧✦Catherine✦✧W 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • DJGummikuhD DJGummikuh

        @david_chisnall *chuckles in IPv6*

        ✧✦Catherine✦✧W This user is from outside of this forum
        ✧✦Catherine✦✧W This user is from outside of this forum
        ✧✦Catherine✦✧
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @DJGummikuh @david_chisnall go on

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)D David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

          There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

          Jake Hildreth (acorn) :blacker_heart_outline:H This user is from outside of this forum
          Jake Hildreth (acorn) :blacker_heart_outline:H This user is from outside of this forum
          Jake Hildreth (acorn) :blacker_heart_outline:
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @david_chisnall @pluralistic oh no. I'm currently rebuilding my most popular project from scratch.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)D David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

            There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

            FediThing :progress_pride:F This user is from outside of this forum
            FediThing :progress_pride:F This user is from outside of this forum
            FediThing :progress_pride:
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @david_chisnall

            Also in art and music and many other fields. They'll often prefer their later stuff even though it is nowhere near as popular.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)D David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

              There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

              socS This user is from outside of this forum
              socS This user is from outside of this forum
              soc
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @david_chisnall Happens every time creators of popular programming languages get asked about their language design ideas. 😆

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)D David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

                There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

                Adam Trickett :debian: :kde:D This user is from outside of this forum
                Adam Trickett :debian: :kde:D This user is from outside of this forum
                Adam Trickett :debian: :kde:
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @david_chisnall companies often think they are great and never consider that they were just lucky.

                When the market changes they suddenly evaporate without trace and are all sulky about it... E.g. Nokia.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)D David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

                  There's a recurring theme in technology that the creators of something popular don't understand why it is popular. Often it's in spite of the thing that they think is important and often because of some completely unrelated ecosystem effects. Then they build a second thing that does whatever they thought was important in the first one, only more so. And they're confused about why it's not popular.

                  jonolethJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jonolethJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jonoleth
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @david_chisnall see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flanderization

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups