I'm just reading this GNU telnetd CVE from last month.

I'm just reading this GNU telnetd CVE from last month. I did not realize that telnet was still a thing, but it turns out anybody could provide a username of "-f root" and, boom, they had root. The vulnerability existed for 11 years. *Wow*. https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24061

I'm just reading this GNU telnetd CVE from last month. I did not realize that telnet was still a thing, but it turns out anybody could provide a username of "-f root" and, boom, they had root. The vulnerability existed for 11 years. *Wow*. https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24061

Don't miss this explanation of how backbone providers coordinated on this telnetd exploit in advance of the CVE release, and simply blocked port 23 traffic. https://www.labs.greynoise.io/grimoire/2026-02-10-telnet-falls-silent/

@waldoj I'm not aware of any backbone provider coordination. That rarely happens for blocking anything - and probably the only time I can even recall there was such a widely coordinated port block was with Slammer over 20 years ago.

Another viewpoint here: https://www.terracenetworks.com/blog/2026-02-11-telnet-routing

I'm just reading this GNU telnetd CVE from last month. I did not realize that telnet was still a thing, but it turns out anybody could provide a username of "-f root" and, boom, they had root. The vulnerability existed for 11 years. *Wow*. https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24061

I'm just reading this GNU telnetd CVE from last month. I did not realize that telnet was still a thing, but it turns out anybody could provide a username of "-f root" and, boom, they had root. The vulnerability existed for 11 years. *Wow*. https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24061

I'm just reading this GNU telnetd CVE from last month. I did not realize that telnet was still a thing, but it turns out anybody could provide a username of "-f root" and, boom, they had root. The vulnerability existed for 11 years. *Wow*. https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24061

I'm just reading this GNU telnetd CVE from last month. I did not realize that telnet was still a thing, but it turns out anybody could provide a username of "-f root" and, boom, they had root. The vulnerability existed for 11 years. *Wow*. https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24061

@waldoj
I suppose most orgs don’t run telnetd on their servers.

@waldoj

my first reaction when i read this was "who uses telnet these days" but then realized that this is probably exactly why no one was fixing bugs in telnetd.

@paul_ipv6 @waldoj

I recently heard about a major ICS/OT gear mfg that ships all end devices with telnet open and well known default creds..."for initial configuration."

@johntimaeus @waldoj

RIPE did a document with recommendations for edge devices, including not having default passwords, requiring setting a decent password before starting to route packets, etc. in the early 1990s. sad that vendors are still shipping vulnerable boxes...

I'm just reading this GNU telnetd CVE from last month. I did not realize that telnet was still a thing, but it turns out anybody could provide a username of "-f root" and, boom, they had root. The vulnerability existed for 11 years. *Wow*. https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24061