Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What's going on here?

What's going on here?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
185 Posts 105 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cR0wC cR0w

    @mttaggart It's just too on the nose.

    Amber :neodog_box:P This user is from outside of this forum
    Amber :neodog_box:P This user is from outside of this forum
    Amber :neodog_box:
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    @cR0w@infosec.exchange @mttaggart@infosec.exchange Insane.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • TaggartM Taggart

      What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

      UPDATE: Link was pulled; see below.

      https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

      Katie Kloss 🏳️‍⚧️K This user is from outside of this forum
      Katie Kloss 🏳️‍⚧️K This user is from outside of this forum
      Katie Kloss 🏳️‍⚧️
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      @mttaggart It's like they all *want* to be made fun of.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • TaggartM Taggart

        What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

        UPDATE: Link was pulled; see below.

        https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

        Jason LefkowitzJ This user is from outside of this forum
        Jason LefkowitzJ This user is from outside of this forum
        Jason Lefkowitz
        wrote last edited by
        #9

        @mttaggart jfc. As an Ars subscriber, I am furious

        SnoopJS JoseJ Matt GriffinM 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • Jason LefkowitzJ Jason Lefkowitz

          @mttaggart jfc. As an Ars subscriber, I am furious

          SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
          SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
          SnoopJ
          wrote last edited by
          #10

          @jalefkowit @mttaggart I'm really saddened that Benj's work seems to have fallen off. I trusted his writing, once.

          GlyphG 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • TaggartM Taggart

            What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

            UPDATE: Link was pulled; see below.

            https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

            dataramaD This user is from outside of this forum
            dataramaD This user is from outside of this forum
            datarama
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            @mttaggart Why is it that I *immediately* figured that the byline would be Benj Edwards?

            rewarpR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • TaggartM Taggart

              What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

              UPDATE: Link was pulled; see below.

              https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

              Corey Snipes 🕯️❄️C This user is from outside of this forum
              Corey Snipes 🕯️❄️C This user is from outside of this forum
              Corey Snipes 🕯️❄️
              wrote last edited by
              #12

              @mttaggart lol @ the one downvote

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • SnoopJS SnoopJ

                @jalefkowit @mttaggart I'm really saddened that Benj's work seems to have fallen off. I trusted his writing, once.

                GlyphG This user is from outside of this forum
                GlyphG This user is from outside of this forum
                Glyph
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                @SnoopJ @jalefkowit @mttaggart I am tempted to go on a tagging spree but out of respect for your mentions I will refrain. but what the hell, someone needs to be held to account for this

                GlyphG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • GlyphG Glyph

                  @SnoopJ @jalefkowit @mttaggart I am tempted to go on a tagging spree but out of respect for your mentions I will refrain. but what the hell, someone needs to be held to account for this

                  GlyphG This user is from outside of this forum
                  GlyphG This user is from outside of this forum
                  Glyph
                  wrote last edited by
                  #14

                  @SnoopJ @jalefkowit @mttaggart in this day and age I do not want to go around saying reporters should be fired, I get that it’s hard out there, but this needs to be a MAJOR scandal for ars and for Benj and Kyle personally

                  SnoopJS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • GlyphG Glyph

                    @SnoopJ @jalefkowit @mttaggart in this day and age I do not want to go around saying reporters should be fired, I get that it’s hard out there, but this needs to be a MAJOR scandal for ars and for Benj and Kyle personally

                    SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
                    SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
                    SnoopJ
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    @glyph @jalefkowit @mttaggart at the very least, it is egregious malpractice.

                    TaggartM Asta [AMP]A 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • SnoopJS SnoopJ

                      @glyph @jalefkowit @mttaggart at the very least, it is egregious malpractice.

                      TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
                      TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
                      Taggart
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @SnoopJ @glyph @jalefkowit I can not imagine an explanation of how this occurred that isn't damning.

                      SnoopJS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • TaggartM Taggart

                        @SnoopJ @glyph @jalefkowit I can not imagine an explanation of how this occurred that isn't damning.

                        SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
                        SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
                        SnoopJ
                        wrote last edited by
                        #17

                        @mttaggart @glyph @jalefkowit laying my personal wager on "someone used the nonsense machine" but agreed, I cannot think of any explanation for this that would be remotely acceptable.

                        SnoopJS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • SnoopJS SnoopJ

                          @mttaggart @glyph @jalefkowit laying my personal wager on "someone used the nonsense machine" but agreed, I cannot think of any explanation for this that would be remotely acceptable.

                          SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
                          SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
                          SnoopJ
                          wrote last edited by
                          #18

                          @mttaggart @glyph @jalefkowit correction: I *can* think of one, and it's "they accidentally quoted from the hit-piece blog articles instead"

                          But they didn't do that, those don't contain the quotes either.

                          Jason LefkowitzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • SnoopJS SnoopJ

                            @glyph @jalefkowit @mttaggart at the very least, it is egregious malpractice.

                            Asta [AMP]A This user is from outside of this forum
                            Asta [AMP]A This user is from outside of this forum
                            Asta [AMP]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #19

                            @SnoopJ@hachyderm.io @glyph@mastodon.social @jalefkowit@vmst.io @mttaggart@infosec.exchange I am disappointed, although not surprised, that my read on Benj's work at Ars turned out to the accurate one in recent years. Bleh.

                            SnoopJS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • TaggartM Taggart

                              What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                              UPDATE: Link was pulled; see below.

                              https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                              AddisonA This user is from outside of this forum
                              AddisonA This user is from outside of this forum
                              Addison
                              wrote last edited by
                              #20

                              @mttaggart@infosec.exchange link is dead

                              chris@strafpla.netC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Asta [AMP]A Asta [AMP]

                                @SnoopJ@hachyderm.io @glyph@mastodon.social @jalefkowit@vmst.io @mttaggart@infosec.exchange I am disappointed, although not surprised, that my read on Benj's work at Ars turned out to the accurate one in recent years. Bleh.

                                SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
                                SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
                                SnoopJ
                                wrote last edited by
                                #21

                                @aud very rude of him to fall off so strongly immediately after I defended his work to you

                                Asta [AMP]A cthos 🐱C 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • TaggartM Taggart

                                  What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                                  UPDATE: Link was pulled; see below.

                                  https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                                  BrettB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  BrettB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Brett
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #22

                                  @mttaggart

                                  Seeing the absolute shit shoveling going on that counts for producing content at Ars over the past well...10-15 years at this point...

                                  I'm not sure anyone should be following them let alone paying them subscription money.

                                  That they are now using AI to write their articles is the least surprising thing ever. What a catastrophic fall from grace.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • TaggartM Taggart

                                    What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                                    UPDATE: Link was pulled; see below.

                                    https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                                    Eric JenningsH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Eric JenningsH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Eric Jennings
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #23

                                    @mttaggart @mhoye Looks like @arstechnica just pulled the article.

                                    TaggartM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • SnoopJS SnoopJ

                                      @aud very rude of him to fall off so strongly immediately after I defended his work to you

                                      Asta [AMP]A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Asta [AMP]A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Asta [AMP]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #24

                                      @SnoopJ@hachyderm.io One explanation I can think of is that an editor or Conde Nast higher up generated this using the author's bylines, without their involvement.

                                      I would not put it past Conde Nast.

                                      Asta [AMP]A 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • TaggartM Taggart

                                        What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                                        UPDATE: Link was pulled; see below.

                                        https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                                        brendan (ジャンク品)B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        brendan (ジャンク品)B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        brendan (ジャンク品)
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #25

                                        @mttaggart i expect better from kyle; i do not trust benj edwards at all. between him and eric berger doing free pr for elon musk ars is in a sorry state right now

                                        Dr. SobekS Lee from ColoradoC 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Asta [AMP]A Asta [AMP]

                                          @SnoopJ@hachyderm.io One explanation I can think of is that an editor or Conde Nast higher up generated this using the author's bylines, without their involvement.

                                          I would not put it past Conde Nast.

                                          Asta [AMP]A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Asta [AMP]A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Asta [AMP]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #26

                                          @SnoopJ@hachyderm.io but if his work had been good (which I was not familiar with before I started reading his articles that smacked increasingly more of boosterism) before... well, it certainly seems to fall into the pattern that people are seeing with regards to LLM usage (trusting it more and more without checking, etc).

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups