Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
-
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
-
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
@QasimRashid "free Palestine" is antisemitic, but making a list of the Jews who attend Penn State is not.
-
@QasimRashid "free Palestine" is antisemitic, but making a list of the Jews who attend Penn State is not.
@QasimRashid make it make sense
-
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
@QasimRashid the dogs don’t want you! They’ve organized and unionized. And they remember what Kristi Noem does to dogs.
-
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
Randy Fine is an antisemite who has likened Jewish critics of Israel to Nazi collaboraters. A product of elite education, he supports extremist violence in Palestine.
-
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
@QasimRashid Well I have met and worked with many Muslims and it is easy to choose between them and Randy Fine. Oh, I would also choose dogs over Randy Fine
-
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
@QasimRashid The Muslims I know view feeding and helping the poor as an fundamental part of their faith. I'm sure this guy is just fine with cutting SNAP and Medicaid to fund gestapICE.
-
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
@QasimRashid
What is the rest of the context? What is the choice this man is referring to? -
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
-
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
@QasimRashid That's disgusting.
-
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
@QasimRashid I could understand he would face a fatwa.
-
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
@QasimRashid Astounding not so much that he said it but that he must have felt it safe to say - as if this was a universal truth for all except Muslims.
Sickly bad. Doubly so as the system does nothing in response.
-
@QasimRashid
What is the rest of the context? What is the choice this man is referring to? -
Saying “Free Palestine” is considered antisemitic but dehumanizing Muslims as less than dogs is considered free speech for which this MAGA member of Congress will face zero consequences whatsoever.
@QasimRashid what an appallingly horrible person and comment. How could anyone stand being represented by a person like that!
-
@QasimRashid
What is the rest of the context? What is the choice this man is referring to?@Earl @QasimRashid to me it feels very in line with christian folks who talk about “when they ban Christianity this is how we need to handle it”
like it’s this imagined persecution that might happen but obviously never will so they can feel like their suspicion towards everyone who isn’t exactly the same as them can be justified
Basically I’m saying there is no context, this dude just made up some scenario to say he doesn’t like Muslims
-
R ActivityRelay shared this topic
