Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Good news!

Good news!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
30 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • John Carlos BaezJ John Carlos Baez

    I'm trying to figure out how the new solid-state batteries work. So far I'm getting this:

    They use a solid lithium sulfide-based electrolyte - a glassy ceramic material made using Li₂S and P₂S₅, which combine to form various lithium thiophosphates like Li₃PS₄, Li₇P₃S₁₁ and Li₄P₂S₆. The resulting sulfide glass has a high conductivity for Li⁺ ions, comparable to liquid electrolytes. The Li⁺ ions hop through the disordered sulfide lattice via vacancies and interstitial sites.

    The hard part: the glassy material should be soft enough to keep contact with the electrodes as it expands and contracts during charge-discharge cycles, and not crack. Toyota claims to have solved this problem.

    https://oilandenergyonline.com/articles/all/toyotas-breakthrough-solid-state-batteries/

    (Nerdy nitpick: this article says the new car's range is 621 miles. Can you guess why they give such a precise figure?)

    (2/2)

    IsocatI This user is from outside of this forum
    IsocatI This user is from outside of this forum
    Isocat
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @johncarlosbaez Because it's the (rounded) conversion of 1,000 kilometres, mayhap?

    John Carlos BaezJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • John Carlos BaezJ John Carlos Baez

      @arsatiki - I may be overoptimistic, but things are looking better now in various ways:

      "EVs with semi-solid-state batteries are already rolling out in China, albeit in small numbers. Customers can buy and drive them today, thanks to early adopters such as Nio and the state-backed SAIC Motors that invested in the tech early. In the West, Mercedes-Benz and BMW are testing solid-state batteries, and Stellantis is planning to begin trials next year.

      Japanese and Korean automakers are also working on this tech, but they’ve been tight-lipped about their plans. In 2022, Nikkei reported that Toyota held the highest number of solid-state battery patents, followed by Panasonic and Idemitsu."

      https://insideevs.com/news/771402/every-solid-state-battery-ev/

      Antti RasinenA This user is from outside of this forum
      Antti RasinenA This user is from outside of this forum
      Antti Rasinen
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @johncarlosbaez I sure hope I’m wrong! I know they’re getting closer and closer but I’m guess the mass availability is around 2030

      John Carlos BaezJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Steve AtkinsL Steve Atkins

        @johncarlosbaez Presumably ‘cos Americans would be confused by 1000km.

        John Carlos BaezJ This user is from outside of this forum
        John Carlos BaezJ This user is from outside of this forum
        John Carlos Baez
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @lluad - but also because the writer doesn't get the idea of "significant figures". It's like when a reporter hears a tree is 300 meters tall and reports that it's 11811.0236 inches tall. (Okay, I'm exaggerating.)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • John Carlos BaezJ John Carlos Baez

          I'm trying to figure out how the new solid-state batteries work. So far I'm getting this:

          They use a solid lithium sulfide-based electrolyte - a glassy ceramic material made using Li₂S and P₂S₅, which combine to form various lithium thiophosphates like Li₃PS₄, Li₇P₃S₁₁ and Li₄P₂S₆. The resulting sulfide glass has a high conductivity for Li⁺ ions, comparable to liquid electrolytes. The Li⁺ ions hop through the disordered sulfide lattice via vacancies and interstitial sites.

          The hard part: the glassy material should be soft enough to keep contact with the electrodes as it expands and contracts during charge-discharge cycles, and not crack. Toyota claims to have solved this problem.

          https://oilandenergyonline.com/articles/all/toyotas-breakthrough-solid-state-batteries/

          (Nerdy nitpick: this article says the new car's range is 621 miles. Can you guess why they give such a precise figure?)

          (2/2)

          Felix CremerF This user is from outside of this forum
          Felix CremerF This user is from outside of this forum
          Felix Cremer
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @johncarlosbaez That must be 1000 km in miles

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • IsocatI Isocat

            @johncarlosbaez Because it's the (rounded) conversion of 1,000 kilometres, mayhap?

            John Carlos BaezJ This user is from outside of this forum
            John Carlos BaezJ This user is from outside of this forum
            John Carlos Baez
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @isocat - no, because it's the NOT SUFFICIENTLY ROUNDED conversion. 1000 kilometers has one significant digit - it's clearly a rough estimate. Claiming the car goes 621 miles is bullshit. Does it always conk out on mile 622?

            ZER0DYNZ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Antti RasinenA Antti Rasinen

              @johncarlosbaez I sure hope I’m wrong! I know they’re getting closer and closer but I’m guess the mass availability is around 2030

              John Carlos BaezJ This user is from outside of this forum
              John Carlos BaezJ This user is from outside of this forum
              John Carlos Baez
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @arsatiki - I don't mind 2030. As you get older time seems to go faster. Since I'm old, to me 2030 is almost the same as 2028.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Steve AtkinsL Steve Atkins

                @johncarlosbaez Presumably ‘cos Americans would be confused by 1000km.

                CosmoC This user is from outside of this forum
                CosmoC This user is from outside of this forum
                Cosmo
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @lluad@mastodon.ie @johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz Which is fair, because 621 miles mean nothing to me 😄

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • John Carlos BaezJ John Carlos Baez

                  I'm trying to figure out how the new solid-state batteries work. So far I'm getting this:

                  They use a solid lithium sulfide-based electrolyte - a glassy ceramic material made using Li₂S and P₂S₅, which combine to form various lithium thiophosphates like Li₃PS₄, Li₇P₃S₁₁ and Li₄P₂S₆. The resulting sulfide glass has a high conductivity for Li⁺ ions, comparable to liquid electrolytes. The Li⁺ ions hop through the disordered sulfide lattice via vacancies and interstitial sites.

                  The hard part: the glassy material should be soft enough to keep contact with the electrodes as it expands and contracts during charge-discharge cycles, and not crack. Toyota claims to have solved this problem.

                  https://oilandenergyonline.com/articles/all/toyotas-breakthrough-solid-state-batteries/

                  (Nerdy nitpick: this article says the new car's range is 621 miles. Can you guess why they give such a precise figure?)

                  (2/2)

                  CosmoC This user is from outside of this forum
                  CosmoC This user is from outside of this forum
                  Cosmo
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz This all sounds to good to be true!

                  John Carlos BaezJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • CosmoC Cosmo

                    @johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz This all sounds to good to be true!

                    John Carlos BaezJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    John Carlos BaezJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    John Carlos Baez
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @ChrSt - I know what you mean. It may not come as quick as 2028, but the technology seems real. Companies have been working on it for decades:

                    "Still, like any advance at the cutting-edge of electrical or electronic technology, solid-state cells are really, really hard to take from the lab to production EVs. For every 100 promising lab tests of batteries in general, perhaps one will advance to a prototype line—and fewer yet into high-volume production. Toyota learned that lesson 15 years ago, when it couldn’t produce the lithium-ion cell it chose for the third-generation 2010 Toyota Prius—and had to revert to its tried-and-true, 15-year-old nickel-metal hydride cells.

                    Toyota has long been a proponent of solid-state cells. It has said it believes EVs will not be suitable for mass adoption until solid-state batteries arrive. But even mighty Toyota has struggled to get solid-state cells into production. It first showed a prototype solid-state cell 15 years ago, in December 2010. Through most of the 2010s, it said it would put solid-state cells into production by 2020. In late 2023, the company announced that date had slipped to 2027. "

                    https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a63306863/solid-state-batteries-evs-explained/

                    CosmoC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • John Carlos BaezJ John Carlos Baez

                      @ChrSt - I know what you mean. It may not come as quick as 2028, but the technology seems real. Companies have been working on it for decades:

                      "Still, like any advance at the cutting-edge of electrical or electronic technology, solid-state cells are really, really hard to take from the lab to production EVs. For every 100 promising lab tests of batteries in general, perhaps one will advance to a prototype line—and fewer yet into high-volume production. Toyota learned that lesson 15 years ago, when it couldn’t produce the lithium-ion cell it chose for the third-generation 2010 Toyota Prius—and had to revert to its tried-and-true, 15-year-old nickel-metal hydride cells.

                      Toyota has long been a proponent of solid-state cells. It has said it believes EVs will not be suitable for mass adoption until solid-state batteries arrive. But even mighty Toyota has struggled to get solid-state cells into production. It first showed a prototype solid-state cell 15 years ago, in December 2010. Through most of the 2010s, it said it would put solid-state cells into production by 2020. In late 2023, the company announced that date had slipped to 2027. "

                      https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a63306863/solid-state-batteries-evs-explained/

                      CosmoC This user is from outside of this forum
                      CosmoC This user is from outside of this forum
                      Cosmo
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz I knew of SSBs, but this Toyota's approach is new to me.
                      I am so on board for this being awesome – can't wait!

                      CosmoC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • CosmoC Cosmo

                        @johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz I knew of SSBs, but this Toyota's approach is new to me.
                        I am so on board for this being awesome – can't wait!

                        CosmoC This user is from outside of this forum
                        CosmoC This user is from outside of this forum
                        Cosmo
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz Disregarding any delays, that there is at least a seemingly realistic approach to further development in this fields makes me optimistic 🙂

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • John Carlos BaezJ John Carlos Baez

                          Good news! By 2028, Toyota expects to make electric cars with a 1000 kilometer (600 mile) range with batteries that can be charged in just 10 minutes!

                          They're using 'solid-state batteries'. Currently a lot of car batteries use an organic solvent with a dissolved lithium salt. The new solid-state batteries replace that flammable liquid with a glassy material containing compounds of lithium, sulfur and phosphorus. They charge faster, they have 10 times the energy density, and don't easily catch on fire. But they are tricky in various ways.

                          Toyota wants to win the race, and they've teamed up with a Japanese oil company that will manufacture the battery material. But Mercedes-Benz and other companies are also in the race. The activity in China is particularly intense, as you'd expect.

                          https://electrek.co/2026/02/09/big-oil-is-betting-big-on-toyota-to-win-the-solid-state-battery-race/

                          (1/2)

                          ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          ZER0DYN
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @johncarlosbaez
                          I don't know if you have but if you haven't, I suggest you look into Chinese electric cars, they're so much better and it's a crime that I can't buy one of them in the US. They're cheaper and better(or at least, I believe so).

                          Even though America says they love competition... they don't actually "love" competition and free market lol but anyways, if those cars were available in america and people didn't have "Chinese derangement syndrome", those cars will DOMINATE.

                          ZER0DYNZ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • John Carlos BaezJ John Carlos Baez

                            I'm trying to figure out how the new solid-state batteries work. So far I'm getting this:

                            They use a solid lithium sulfide-based electrolyte - a glassy ceramic material made using Li₂S and P₂S₅, which combine to form various lithium thiophosphates like Li₃PS₄, Li₇P₃S₁₁ and Li₄P₂S₆. The resulting sulfide glass has a high conductivity for Li⁺ ions, comparable to liquid electrolytes. The Li⁺ ions hop through the disordered sulfide lattice via vacancies and interstitial sites.

                            The hard part: the glassy material should be soft enough to keep contact with the electrodes as it expands and contracts during charge-discharge cycles, and not crack. Toyota claims to have solved this problem.

                            https://oilandenergyonline.com/articles/all/toyotas-breakthrough-solid-state-batteries/

                            (Nerdy nitpick: this article says the new car's range is 621 miles. Can you guess why they give such a precise figure?)

                            (2/2)

                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Guest
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            @johncarlosbaez There is a motorcycle company in Finland that claims to already have solid state batteries. Most people don't believe it.

                            https://www.donutlab.com/battery/

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ZER0DYNZ ZER0DYN

                              @johncarlosbaez
                              I don't know if you have but if you haven't, I suggest you look into Chinese electric cars, they're so much better and it's a crime that I can't buy one of them in the US. They're cheaper and better(or at least, I believe so).

                              Even though America says they love competition... they don't actually "love" competition and free market lol but anyways, if those cars were available in america and people didn't have "Chinese derangement syndrome", those cars will DOMINATE.

                              ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              ZER0DYN
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @johncarlosbaez
                              This video is an example of what I'm talking about, I believe it's a crime by the government that the American people aren't even given the opportunity to buy this car, I believe it's anti free market and thus, in essence anti American values. The US government stopped serving the American people, and started serving corporations. Also corporations today are too focused on making profits.

                              But anyways, I went on a tangent there. you can find the video below:

                              ZER0DYNZ 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • ZER0DYNZ ZER0DYN

                                @johncarlosbaez
                                This video is an example of what I'm talking about, I believe it's a crime by the government that the American people aren't even given the opportunity to buy this car, I believe it's anti free market and thus, in essence anti American values. The US government stopped serving the American people, and started serving corporations. Also corporations today are too focused on making profits.

                                But anyways, I went on a tangent there. you can find the video below:

                                ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                ZER0DYN
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @johncarlosbaez
                                Also here is the guys Youtube channel:
                                https://www.youtube.com/@forrestsautoreviewsofficial

                                if you want to watch more of his videos.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • John Carlos BaezJ John Carlos Baez

                                  I'm trying to figure out how the new solid-state batteries work. So far I'm getting this:

                                  They use a solid lithium sulfide-based electrolyte - a glassy ceramic material made using Li₂S and P₂S₅, which combine to form various lithium thiophosphates like Li₃PS₄, Li₇P₃S₁₁ and Li₄P₂S₆. The resulting sulfide glass has a high conductivity for Li⁺ ions, comparable to liquid electrolytes. The Li⁺ ions hop through the disordered sulfide lattice via vacancies and interstitial sites.

                                  The hard part: the glassy material should be soft enough to keep contact with the electrodes as it expands and contracts during charge-discharge cycles, and not crack. Toyota claims to have solved this problem.

                                  https://oilandenergyonline.com/articles/all/toyotas-breakthrough-solid-state-batteries/

                                  (Nerdy nitpick: this article says the new car's range is 621 miles. Can you guess why they give such a precise figure?)

                                  (2/2)

                                  BenjohnB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  BenjohnB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Benjohn
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @johncarlosbaez it’s 1,000km, right? Man. How annoying is that.

                                  My current car has a 600km petrol range, and I need to take a 20m break after that. So.

                                  Yay. Solid state batteries! Let’s gooooo!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • John Carlos BaezJ John Carlos Baez

                                    I'm trying to figure out how the new solid-state batteries work. So far I'm getting this:

                                    They use a solid lithium sulfide-based electrolyte - a glassy ceramic material made using Li₂S and P₂S₅, which combine to form various lithium thiophosphates like Li₃PS₄, Li₇P₃S₁₁ and Li₄P₂S₆. The resulting sulfide glass has a high conductivity for Li⁺ ions, comparable to liquid electrolytes. The Li⁺ ions hop through the disordered sulfide lattice via vacancies and interstitial sites.

                                    The hard part: the glassy material should be soft enough to keep contact with the electrodes as it expands and contracts during charge-discharge cycles, and not crack. Toyota claims to have solved this problem.

                                    https://oilandenergyonline.com/articles/all/toyotas-breakthrough-solid-state-batteries/

                                    (Nerdy nitpick: this article says the new car's range is 621 miles. Can you guess why they give such a precise figure?)

                                    (2/2)

                                    BenjohnB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    BenjohnB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Benjohn
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @johncarlosbaez don’t know anything about the donut battery? I’ve been looking out since they announced, but I’ve not heard a follow on yet. Could be nonsense?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ZER0DYNZ ZER0DYN

                                      @johncarlosbaez
                                      This video is an example of what I'm talking about, I believe it's a crime by the government that the American people aren't even given the opportunity to buy this car, I believe it's anti free market and thus, in essence anti American values. The US government stopped serving the American people, and started serving corporations. Also corporations today are too focused on making profits.

                                      But anyways, I went on a tangent there. you can find the video below:

                                      ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ZER0DYN
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @johncarlosbaez
                                      I can't afford this car at the moment LOL but I am justified in my critique cause in the future if I do have the money to purchase, I won't be able to do so unfortunately but also there is a lot of bullshit/strings that comes with owning a car in the US and probably most places.

                                      In my ideal world, people won't need to drive, it will all be self driving and free, people will only own cars for "fun".

                                      ZER0DYNZ 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ZER0DYNZ ZER0DYN

                                        @johncarlosbaez
                                        I can't afford this car at the moment LOL but I am justified in my critique cause in the future if I do have the money to purchase, I won't be able to do so unfortunately but also there is a lot of bullshit/strings that comes with owning a car in the US and probably most places.

                                        In my ideal world, people won't need to drive, it will all be self driving and free, people will only own cars for "fun".

                                        ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ZER0DYN
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @johncarlosbaez
                                        Anyways, I'm glad Toyota is focused on electrics cars. They're my favorite car company, their products are low maintenance compared to others. I'm not a "car guy" so I just care about utility, I got other hobbies, and car fixation is just isn't one of them.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • John Carlos BaezJ John Carlos Baez

                                          @isocat - no, because it's the NOT SUFFICIENTLY ROUNDED conversion. 1000 kilometers has one significant digit - it's clearly a rough estimate. Claiming the car goes 621 miles is bullshit. Does it always conk out on mile 622?

                                          ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ZER0DYNZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ZER0DYN
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @johncarlosbaez @isocat
                                          If they are a responsible ethical company then it's probably an under estimation. The same way bridges have "limits", it probably could handle more but that's the "safe" zone. I believe it's better to give lower rough estimates that is false when real capability is higher than the vice versa. But also with these companies, it could all just be marketing schemes. imma be honest, 1000 kilometers looks better to the eye than 621 miles. Also, it could all just be bullshit.

                                          ZER0DYNZ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups