Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What's going on here?

What's going on here?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
185 Posts 105 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Eric JenningsH Eric Jennings

    @mttaggart @mhoye Looks like @arstechnica just pulled the article.

    TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
    TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
    Taggart
    wrote last edited by
    #28

    @HitokiriEric @mhoye @arstechnica Maybe, but Pepperidge Farm remembers: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • TaggartM Taggart

      What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

      UPDATE: Link was pulled; see below.

      https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

      TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
      TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
      Taggart
      wrote last edited by
      #29

      UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

      hackilluH João Tiago Rebelo (NAFO J-121)J TaggartM bbbhltzB E 17 Replies Last reply
      0
      • SnoopJS SnoopJ

        @mttaggart @glyph @jalefkowit correction: I *can* think of one, and it's "they accidentally quoted from the hit-piece blog articles instead"

        But they didn't do that, those don't contain the quotes either.

        Jason LefkowitzJ This user is from outside of this forum
        Jason LefkowitzJ This user is from outside of this forum
        Jason Lefkowitz
        wrote last edited by
        #30

        @SnoopJ @mttaggart @glyph Looks like the article has been completely deleted.

        Aurich said in the comments before it vanished that they were aware of the issue and looking into it. I assume the findings were pretty dire.

        https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • TaggartM Taggart

          What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

          UPDATE: Link was pulled; see below.

          https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

          Josh :blobcat_googly2:J This user is from outside of this forum
          Josh :blobcat_googly2:J This user is from outside of this forum
          Josh :blobcat_googly2:
          wrote last edited by
          #31

          @mttaggart archive dot org link since they took it down: https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • TaggartM Taggart

            UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

            hackilluH This user is from outside of this forum
            hackilluH This user is from outside of this forum
            hackillu
            wrote last edited by
            #32

            @mttaggart Crap, they DID?! I still have it open! Anything you want before it goes into the void?

            TaggartM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • hackilluH hackillu

              @mttaggart Crap, they DID?! I still have it open! Anything you want before it goes into the void?

              TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
              TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
              Taggart
              wrote last edited by
              #33

              @hackillu https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

              hackilluH 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • TaggartM Taggart

                UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                João Tiago Rebelo (NAFO J-121)J This user is from outside of this forum
                João Tiago Rebelo (NAFO J-121)J This user is from outside of this forum
                João Tiago Rebelo (NAFO J-121)
                wrote last edited by
                #34

                @mttaggart a "we have hallucinated too and have pulled the article that was here before" would have been better. Good thing you saved it.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • TaggartM Taggart

                  UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                  TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
                  TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
                  Taggart
                  wrote last edited by
                  #35

                  This scoop brought to you by the TTI Intel Feed, which also routinely beats commercial threat intel to the punch on important emerging threats.

                  https://intel.taggartinstitute.org/

                  TaggartM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • TaggartM Taggart

                    @hackillu https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

                    hackilluH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hackilluH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hackillu
                    wrote last edited by
                    #36

                    @mttaggart And thus we close it.

                    hackilluH 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • hackilluH hackillu

                      @mttaggart And thus we close it.

                      hackilluH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hackilluH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hackillu
                      wrote last edited by
                      #37

                      @mttaggart I got the comments though.

                      TaggartM The Other BrookT 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • hackilluH hackillu

                        @mttaggart I got the comments though.

                        TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
                        TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
                        Taggart
                        wrote last edited by
                        #38

                        @hackillu Nice!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • TaggartM Taggart

                          UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                          bbbhltzB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bbbhltzB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bbbhltz
                          wrote last edited by
                          #39

                          @mttaggart of course they did, but now they'll need to explain how they managed to let that get published

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • TaggartM Taggart

                            UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                            E This user is from outside of this forum
                            E This user is from outside of this forum
                            Epic Null
                            wrote last edited by
                            #40

                            @mttaggart I suppose one thing you can say about old newspapers - no one can pretend an article was never printed

                            RealGene ☣️R 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • TaggartM Taggart

                              UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                              Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) :paw:⁠:paw:C This user is from outside of this forum
                              Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) :paw:⁠:paw:C This user is from outside of this forum
                              Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) :paw:⁠:paw:
                              wrote last edited by
                              #41

                              @mttaggart So it was a double slop article? -_-

                              TaggartM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • TaggartM Taggart

                                What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                                UPDATE: Link was pulled; see below.

                                https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                                CassanderD This user is from outside of this forum
                                CassanderD This user is from outside of this forum
                                Cassander
                                wrote last edited by
                                #42

                                @mttaggart https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

                                TaggartM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • CassanderD Cassander

                                  @mttaggart https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

                                  TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Taggart
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #43

                                  @drsbaitso Was just about to post this, thank you.

                                  CassanderD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • TaggartM Taggart

                                    @drsbaitso Was just about to post this, thank you.

                                    CassanderD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    CassanderD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Cassander
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #44

                                    @mttaggart Also, this is not a good situation. Ars has some serious explaining to do.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • TaggartM Taggart

                                      UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                                      Frank SkorniaF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Frank SkorniaF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Frank Skornia
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #45

                                      @mttaggart I happened to be reading in the comment section before the article got pulled.
                                      Here is Aurich's last post saying the article was pulled and they're going to be investigating, but there probably won't be any answers until Monday and they'll update readers then.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) :paw:⁠:paw:C Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) :paw:⁠:paw:

                                        @mttaggart So it was a double slop article? -_-

                                        TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        TaggartM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Taggart
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #46

                                        @catsalad Slop on slop on slop. Literally.

                                        Advanced Persistent TeapotH tehfishmanT 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • TaggartM Taggart

                                          UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                                          The Other BrookT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          The Other BrookT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          The Other Brook
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #47

                                          @mttaggart Oh, I wish you'd gotten the comments too. I can only imagine what some familiar handles would have had to say in them.

                                          TaggartM MikeM 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups