Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence."

So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
39 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

    That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

    Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

    The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
    myrmepropagandist
    wrote last edited by
    #13

    There are these social media memes about how army ants sometimes can get trapped walking in a circle. A "death spiral" this is presented with a knowing head shake about the dangers of just following the crowd.

    This always annoys me since it takes extreme circumstances for this to happen to army ants. They have built in mechanisms to break such cycles and do so all the time...

    But when in a human built environment they may get trapped. There are no tempting distractions for "wrong way ants"

    myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

      There are these social media memes about how army ants sometimes can get trapped walking in a circle. A "death spiral" this is presented with a knowing head shake about the dangers of just following the crowd.

      This always annoys me since it takes extreme circumstances for this to happen to army ants. They have built in mechanisms to break such cycles and do so all the time...

      But when in a human built environment they may get trapped. There are no tempting distractions for "wrong way ants"

      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
      myrmepropagandist
      wrote last edited by
      #14

      As a participant in the human "death spiral" that is our current approach to things like climate change I find it hard to find fault with the ants.

      Reginald BraithwaiteR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

        That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

        Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

        The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

        Marijke LuttekesM This user is from outside of this forum
        Marijke LuttekesM This user is from outside of this forum
        Marijke Luttekes
        wrote last edited by
        #15

        @futurebird This is about ants, but it feels like a metaphor about neurodivergence.

        Everyday.Human DerekE myrmepropagandistF 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

          As a participant in the human "death spiral" that is our current approach to things like climate change I find it hard to find fault with the ants.

          Reginald BraithwaiteR This user is from outside of this forum
          Reginald BraithwaiteR This user is from outside of this forum
          Reginald Braithwaite
          wrote last edited by
          #16

          @futurebird When my children were young I told them to be proud of humanity: Humans are the most advanced form of life on Earth, according to every metric humans have devised to measure "advanced."

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Marijke LuttekesM Marijke Luttekes

            @futurebird This is about ants, but it feels like a metaphor about neurodivergence.

            Everyday.Human DerekE This user is from outside of this forum
            Everyday.Human DerekE This user is from outside of this forum
            Everyday.Human Derek
            wrote last edited by
            #17

            @mahryekuh @futurebird
            I thought maybe I was cognitively biased I felt it too, could be both.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

              So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

              Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

              * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
              * Is a billionaire intelligent?
              * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

              Zonder ZonO This user is from outside of this forum
              Zonder ZonO This user is from outside of this forum
              Zonder Zon
              wrote last edited by
              #18

              @futurebird
              Using brain mass, the glial cell ratio, the average number of neurons/kg, and similar measures has always sounded to me like a strong collective confirmation bias, under which whatever metric is used must satisfy these preconceived assumptions: Einstein > humans > monkeys > dogs > cats > rats > chickens > insects > plants.

              This says a lot about how intelligence is perceived: a linear, vertical hierarchy of individuals used to enforce domination over people and other living beings.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • CyberFrogF CyberFrog

                @futurebird@sauropods.win no no it's much simpler than that, things I like are intelligent, and things I don't like are not!

                this is only half a joke, honestly most of human history crudely boils down to this lol

                A Flock of BeaglesB This user is from outside of this forum
                A Flock of BeaglesB This user is from outside of this forum
                A Flock of Beagles
                wrote last edited by
                #19

                @futurebird @froge not so much all of human history, but definitely the eugenics part.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Marijke LuttekesM Marijke Luttekes

                  @futurebird This is about ants, but it feels like a metaphor about neurodivergence.

                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                  myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                  myrmepropagandist
                  wrote last edited by
                  #20

                  @mahryekuh

                  I think that's part of it. Although what keeps me up at night is thinking about the ease with which ants will abandon a bad but popular path for a shorter more effective one.

                  You will never have an ant who is saying "but this is the way my older sister went, you insult her memory by not using her path, she suffered so much" or "that ant who found the new shorter path thinks she's better than me, lets get rid of her and the path this is so embarrassing."

                  I hope.

                  Rebecca NordquistR llewellyL Landa :graz:L 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • Jessie Kirk • 🏳️‍⚧️ :ace: 🕊️T Jessie Kirk • 🏳️‍⚧️ :ace: 🕊️

                    @futurebird It's such a loaded term that I've found it difficult to discuss philosophically or scientifically, as like if I say species X is less intelligent than species Y, I'm insulting X.

                    A Flock of BeaglesB This user is from outside of this forum
                    A Flock of BeaglesB This user is from outside of this forum
                    A Flock of Beagles
                    wrote last edited by
                    #21

                    @futurebird @thejessiekirk it has no scientific definition because it is a pseudo-scientific term.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                      That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

                      Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

                      The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

                      Rob BosR This user is from outside of this forum
                      Rob BosR This user is from outside of this forum
                      Rob Bos
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22

                      @futurebird
                      I relate to this ant.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                        @mahryekuh

                        I think that's part of it. Although what keeps me up at night is thinking about the ease with which ants will abandon a bad but popular path for a shorter more effective one.

                        You will never have an ant who is saying "but this is the way my older sister went, you insult her memory by not using her path, she suffered so much" or "that ant who found the new shorter path thinks she's better than me, lets get rid of her and the path this is so embarrassing."

                        I hope.

                        Rebecca NordquistR This user is from outside of this forum
                        Rebecca NordquistR This user is from outside of this forum
                        Rebecca Nordquist
                        wrote last edited by
                        #23

                        @futurebird @mahryekuh This is excellent... We should all follow the ant philosophy 🙂

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                          That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

                          Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

                          The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

                          Claudius LinkR This user is from outside of this forum
                          Claudius LinkR This user is from outside of this forum
                          Claudius Link
                          wrote last edited by
                          #24

                          @futurebird
                          The funny thing is that human innovation often starts with "the wrong way"

                          E.g. the discovery of x-rays by the accidental x-ray of Wilhelm Röntgens wife Anna Bertha Ludwig's hand .

                          Or the discovery of penicillin through an contaminated sample

                          RyeNCode 🇨🇦R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                            So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

                            Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

                            * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
                            * Is a billionaire intelligent?
                            * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

                            Dawn AhukannaD This user is from outside of this forum
                            Dawn AhukannaD This user is from outside of this forum
                            Dawn Ahukanna
                            wrote last edited by
                            #25

                            @futurebird
                            “intelligent” is an adjective categorizing/qualifying a noun & has meaning in an applied context: having or showing high level of intelligence.
                            “Intelligence” is a noun, describing a specific ability to acquire knowledge & skills.
                            So “intelligent intelligence” implies there is also “unintelligent intelligence” therefore the noun is spectral in nature like light- 😀😆😉😬.

                            In general conversation it seems “Intelligence” is being conflated with “genius” I.e. exceptional intelligence.

                            Dawn AhukannaD 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                              "Aphids are less intelligent than ants." I think even the ants and aphids are aware of this. But, what does that statement really mean?

                              Aphids make very few observable interesting decisions.

                              In contrast to this ants are constantly making decisions that are easy to observe. For some aphids, part of their survival strategy is to allow ants to make most of their decisions for them.

                              Ants decide where they forage. Ants decide if they reproduce. Ants even regulate their digestive system.

                              llewellyL This user is from outside of this forum
                              llewellyL This user is from outside of this forum
                              llewelly
                              wrote last edited by
                              #26

                              @futurebird according to my memory, one method of observing aphid decisions involves attaching tiny gold wires to the aphids, and other tiny gold wires to the phloem tubes in the plant, so that when an aphid starts sucking sugar-rich fluid from the plant, an electrical circuit is completed, and when the aphid stops sucking fluid, the circuit is broken. Sounds fun! Or not for me, since I have terrible fine muscule motor control. (This came up in an old episode of arthro-pod .)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Claudius LinkR Claudius Link

                                @futurebird
                                The funny thing is that human innovation often starts with "the wrong way"

                                E.g. the discovery of x-rays by the accidental x-ray of Wilhelm Röntgens wife Anna Bertha Ludwig's hand .

                                Or the discovery of penicillin through an contaminated sample

                                RyeNCode 🇨🇦R This user is from outside of this forum
                                RyeNCode 🇨🇦R This user is from outside of this forum
                                RyeNCode 🇨🇦
                                wrote last edited by
                                #27

                                @realn2s @futurebird
                                The Heretics had not always been villains. Rather seen as essential Different Thinkers and Questioners of the accepted truths.
                                We've lost sight of the value in examining "truth" derived from tradition. (Not to be confused with rejection of one with blind accept of an alternative)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • FediThing :progress_pride:F FediThing :progress_pride:

                                  @futurebird

                                  Love the implication of the second one 😁

                                  Three plus or minus fiveT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Three plus or minus fiveT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Three plus or minus five
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #28

                                  @FediThing @futurebird

                                  Do they make interesting decisions? Arguably not: given any choice they will reliably do the thing that maximizes their power and wealth. I doubt any take risks for ethics or well-being of others.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                    @mahryekuh

                                    I think that's part of it. Although what keeps me up at night is thinking about the ease with which ants will abandon a bad but popular path for a shorter more effective one.

                                    You will never have an ant who is saying "but this is the way my older sister went, you insult her memory by not using her path, she suffered so much" or "that ant who found the new shorter path thinks she's better than me, lets get rid of her and the path this is so embarrassing."

                                    I hope.

                                    llewellyL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    llewellyL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    llewelly
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #29

                                    @futurebird @mahryekuh avoiding bad attractors like cars, amazon (the online purchasing scam), cryptocurrency, and covid-19 has made me terribly unpopular. More importantly, it has cost me jobs, which has led to homelessness. And don't even get me started on how medical insurers and education systems pummel people who avoid bad attractors like cars with hatred and abuse. Nothing is more unamerican than avoiding bad attractors.

                                    🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦Z 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                      So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

                                      Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

                                      * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
                                      * Is a billionaire intelligent?
                                      * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

                                      gclefG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gclefG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gclef
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #30

                                      @futurebird

                                      Intelligence is asking questions.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                                        So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

                                        Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

                                        * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
                                        * Is a billionaire intelligent?
                                        * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

                                        CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Cassandrich
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #31

                                        @futurebird 1. No.
                                        2. No.
                                        3. Intelligence isn't an axis of measurement, it's a qualitative property. So no.

                                        CassandrichD 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • CassandrichD Cassandrich

                                          @futurebird 1. No.
                                          2. No.
                                          3. Intelligence isn't an axis of measurement, it's a qualitative property. So no.

                                          CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Cassandrich
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #32

                                          @futurebird Re: 1 & 2, a big part of intelligence is the ability to use reasoning processes to manage consequences. Neither a calculator nor a billionaire experiences consequences so neither can have intelligence.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups