Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Reading David Hogg on LLMs in astrophysics should be mandatory.

Reading David Hogg on LLMs in astrophysics should be mandatory.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
9 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
    Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
    Aleks Scholz
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Reading David Hogg on LLMs in astrophysics should be mandatory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10181 (edited with link)

    Aleks ScholzA Dr. Victoria GrinbergV 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • Aleks ScholzA Aleks Scholz

      Reading David Hogg on LLMs in astrophysics should be mandatory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10181 (edited with link)

      Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
      Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
      Aleks Scholz
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      'There are two points in play here: The first is that teams that produce data are increasingly professionalized, and removed from research astrophysics. The second is that the astrophysics community is increasingly expecting to receive trustworthy, vetted, calibrated, and complete data.'

      Aleks ScholzA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Aleks ScholzA Aleks Scholz

        'There are two points in play here: The first is that teams that produce data are increasingly professionalized, and removed from research astrophysics. The second is that the astrophysics community is increasingly expecting to receive trustworthy, vetted, calibrated, and complete data.'

        Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
        Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
        Aleks Scholz
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        "For analysis of the Gaia data, a data scientist who has taken an astronomy class might be better prepared than an astronomer who has taken a data science class."

        Aleks ScholzA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Aleks ScholzA Aleks Scholz

          "For analysis of the Gaia data, a data scientist who has taken an astronomy class might be better prepared than an astronomer who has taken a data science class."

          Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
          Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
          Aleks Scholz
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          "When we employ a graduate student to perform some work, it absolutely must be because the graduate student will benefit from that work, not merely because that work needs to get done."

          Aleks ScholzA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Aleks ScholzA Aleks Scholz

            "When we employ a graduate student to perform some work, it absolutely must be because the graduate student will benefit from that work, not merely because that work needs to get done."

            Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
            Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
            Aleks Scholz
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            'You can’t do science if you don’t live within a network of trust. This point is extremely general: You have to trust your coauthors, you have to trust the literature, and you have to trust the machinery and tools that you use.'

            Aleks ScholzA Bonita MascotaL 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            0
            • Aleks ScholzA Aleks Scholz

              Reading David Hogg on LLMs in astrophysics should be mandatory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10181 (edited with link)

              Dr. Victoria GrinbergV This user is from outside of this forum
              Dr. Victoria GrinbergV This user is from outside of this forum
              Dr. Victoria Grinberg
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @aleks link?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Aleks ScholzA Aleks Scholz

                'You can’t do science if you don’t live within a network of trust. This point is extremely general: You have to trust your coauthors, you have to trust the literature, and you have to trust the machinery and tools that you use.'

                Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
                Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
                Aleks Scholz
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                "If all we really wanted was to know how the Universe worked, we would start a hedge fund, and use the proceeds to pay an astrophysics institute, filled with people who wanted to do astrophysics rather than find out the answers."

                Aleks ScholzA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Aleks ScholzA Aleks Scholz

                  "If all we really wanted was to know how the Universe worked, we would start a hedge fund, and use the proceeds to pay an astrophysics institute, filled with people who wanted to do astrophysics rather than find out the answers."

                  Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
                  Aleks ScholzA This user is from outside of this forum
                  Aleks Scholz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  "Thus anyone working in astrophysics is someone who wants to do astrophysics, not someone who wants to learn the answers; there are way more efficient ways to learn the answers."

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Aleks ScholzA Aleks Scholz

                    'You can’t do science if you don’t live within a network of trust. This point is extremely general: You have to trust your coauthors, you have to trust the literature, and you have to trust the machinery and tools that you use.'

                    Bonita MascotaL This user is from outside of this forum
                    Bonita MascotaL This user is from outside of this forum
                    Bonita Mascota
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @aleks In a network of trust and a culture of doubt.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups