Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The real MLK was a radical.

The real MLK was a radical.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
52 Posts 36 Posters 136 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J J Lou

    @squirrel @amerpie Nordic model doesn’t resolve workers’ inalienable rights violations that occur routinely under all forms of capitalism. Capitalism is deeply inefficient at allocating resources towards public goods and dealing with externalities.

    SquirrelS This user is from outside of this forum
    SquirrelS This user is from outside of this forum
    Squirrel
    wrote last edited by
    #42

    @jlou @amerpie what rights are being violated?

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • SquirrelS Squirrel

      @jlou @amerpie what rights are being violated?

      J This user is from outside of this forum
      J This user is from outside of this forum
      J Lou
      wrote last edited by
      #43

      @squirrel @amerpie the inalienable right to appropriate the positive and negative fruits of your labor.

      Source: https://www.ellerman.org/inalienable-rights-part-i-the-basic-argument/

      SquirrelS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J J Lou

        @squirrel @amerpie the inalienable right to appropriate the positive and negative fruits of your labor.

        Source: https://www.ellerman.org/inalienable-rights-part-i-the-basic-argument/

        SquirrelS This user is from outside of this forum
        SquirrelS This user is from outside of this forum
        Squirrel
        wrote last edited by
        #44

        @jlou @amerpie thanks. that was interesting. these cooperatives are free to operate within a Nordic model, though. you don't have to burn it all down for these to gain traction.

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • SquirrelS Squirrel

          @jlou @amerpie thanks. that was interesting. these cooperatives are free to operate within a Nordic model, though. you don't have to burn it all down for these to gain traction.

          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J Lou
          wrote last edited by
          #45

          @squirrel @amerpie The problem is the violation of workers’ inalienable rights in non-democratic non-cooperative firms. The employment contract must be abolished making all firm’s democratic.

          Abolishing capitalism ≠ burning it all down

          We can have economic democracy and keep many market institutions.

          SquirrelS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J J Lou

            @squirrel @amerpie The problem is the violation of workers’ inalienable rights in non-democratic non-cooperative firms. The employment contract must be abolished making all firm’s democratic.

            Abolishing capitalism ≠ burning it all down

            We can have economic democracy and keep many market institutions.

            SquirrelS This user is from outside of this forum
            SquirrelS This user is from outside of this forum
            Squirrel
            wrote last edited by
            #46

            @jlou @amerpie I understand why somebody would want this. Myself, I kinda feel quite happy renting myself out and not having any responsibility for the fruits, good or bad, of my labor.

            I mean, it is a capable way or organizing, but I'm unsure if it is everything to everyone, if you know what I mean.

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Ultra Verified 🇺🇦U Ultra Verified 🇺🇦

              @amerpie

              In my observation for what it's worth, he was not a "radical", just a decent, caring, thoughtful human being.

              Generations of corporate media has tried desperately to surpress, erase, distort and vilify the man, just for being that kind of person.

              Bot_AnixB This user is from outside of this forum
              Bot_AnixB This user is from outside of this forum
              Bot_Anix
              wrote last edited by
              #47

              @Ultraverified @amerpie
              "decent, caring, thoughtful human being" IS radical. It allows us to focus not on chasing money, but on caring for each other.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • SquirrelS Squirrel

                @jlou @amerpie I understand why somebody would want this. Myself, I kinda feel quite happy renting myself out and not having any responsibility for the fruits, good or bad, of my labor.

                I mean, it is a capable way or organizing, but I'm unsure if it is everything to everyone, if you know what I mean.

                J This user is from outside of this forum
                J This user is from outside of this forum
                J Lou
                wrote last edited by
                #48

                @squirrel @amerpie

                Responsibility is non-transferable even with consent. No matter how much you like the terms of the employment contract. You can’t fulfill it because a de facto person can’t become de facto non-person to fulfill the legal role of a non-person.

                SquirrelS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J J Lou

                  @squirrel @amerpie

                  Responsibility is non-transferable even with consent. No matter how much you like the terms of the employment contract. You can’t fulfill it because a de facto person can’t become de facto non-person to fulfill the legal role of a non-person.

                  SquirrelS This user is from outside of this forum
                  SquirrelS This user is from outside of this forum
                  Squirrel
                  wrote last edited by
                  #49

                  @jlou @amerpie it feels a bit patronizing, tbh.

                  I mean, we have the concept of non-transferable rights in most democracies, but I guess I'm comfortable with the specifics as they are today because I've lived with them forever.

                  Thanks for giving me something to think about, friend.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • DressToKILTD DressToKILT

                    @capngloval @amerpie describing capitalism as "not perfect" is kind of burying the lede. It is an awful system, designed by wicked people to accumulate power while simultaneously getting the have-nots to blame themselves for their failure to be one of the haves and crabs-in-a-barreling each other.

                    Capitalism is perfect, in the same way that a xenomorph is perfect. Unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality.

                    DennyC This user is from outside of this forum
                    DennyC This user is from outside of this forum
                    Denny
                    wrote last edited by
                    #50

                    @dresstokilt @amerpie I could have been verbose about it, but I am still right. It is not perfect, which is what I said. I should have added a "very not perfect". I agree with everything you said. But the other options are nearly just as bad. As the Bible says, we are the blind leading the blind. Human rule always is deeply flawed.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L'égrégore André ꕭꕬM L'égrégore André ꕭꕬ

                      @capngloval @amerpie Thing is: we still can come up with something far better than capitalism.

                      DennyC This user is from outside of this forum
                      DennyC This user is from outside of this forum
                      Denny
                      wrote last edited by
                      #51

                      @Mabande I doubt it. The problem is humans near sighted-ness. All the systems we have come up with so far are as flawed as capitalism.

                      L'égrégore André ꕭꕬM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • DennyC Denny

                        @Mabande I doubt it. The problem is humans near sighted-ness. All the systems we have come up with so far are as flawed as capitalism.

                        L'égrégore André ꕭꕬM This user is from outside of this forum
                        L'égrégore André ꕭꕬM This user is from outside of this forum
                        L'égrégore André ꕭꕬ
                        wrote last edited by
                        #52

                        @capngloval Have they all been as flawed or were some of them just overpowered and destroyed by capitalism?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups