Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Technical Discussion
  3. Is Zotum following FEP f228?

Is Zotum following FEP f228?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technical Discussion
fepf228
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • julianJ This user is from outside of this forum
    julianJ This user is from outside of this forum
    julian
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hey @fentiger@zotum.net, I was debugging something @thisismissem sent me a couple days back, and in the process of doing so discovered that Zotum.net serves context with activities!

    It looks to be following FEP f228, and would be one of the few implementations that serves activities. The bug related to handling context collections specifically sending activities, so that was a fun dive <img class="not-responsive emoji" src="https://activitypub.space/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f60f.png?v=aa0c143f12c" title="😏" />

    Ping @silverpill@mitra.social, the FEP could be amended to include Zotum (or whatever the software is called)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    1
    • R AodeRelay shared this topic on
    • Mike PF This user is from outside of this forum
      Mike PF This user is from outside of this forum
      Mike P
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @julian (I replied to this from Hubzilla, but it doesn't seem to have showed up, so reposting from Mastodon... sorry for the duplicate)

      Yes, it does.

      I think FEP-171b is the relevant spec; Mike Macgirvin's description of Conversation Containers might be relevant too.

      It's running Hubzilla, which is already listed as an implementer of FEP-f228.

      @fentiger@zotum.net @silverpill

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      0
      • R AodeRelay shared this topic on
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups