Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Jack Dorsey skipped ActivityPub, built AtProto, lost Twitter, funded Bluesky, watched it become a company with VCs and a board, said it was "repeating all the mistakes," left, and now funds Nostr.

Jack Dorsey skipped ActivityPub, built AtProto, lost Twitter, funded Bluesky, watched it become a company with VCs and a board, said it was "repeating all the mistakes," left, and now funds Nostr.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
265 Posts 52 Posters 38 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Renaud ChaputR Renaud Chaput

    @thisismissem You are wrong here, those donations were not made in exchange of any specific features.

    This is the case for grants where the money is in exchange of specific deliverables, but those donations were not grants.

    @evan @quillmatiq @dansup

    Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
    Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
    Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»
    wrote last edited by
    #171

    @renchap @evan @quillmatiq @dansup sure. I believe your 2024 annual report states that 1.5 million from Jeff Atwood was specifically for trying to restructure the projects organisation, that's a "feature" as big as any.

    Renaud ChaputR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»

      @renchap @evan @quillmatiq @dansup sure. I believe your 2024 annual report states that 1.5 million from Jeff Atwood was specifically for trying to restructure the projects organisation, that's a "feature" as big as any.

      Renaud ChaputR This user is from outside of this forum
      Renaud ChaputR This user is from outside of this forum
      Renaud Chaput
      wrote last edited by
      #172

      @thisismissem this is what went to Eugen + some legal fees around the complex legal restructuring that went alongside it.

      @evan @quillmatiq @dansup

      Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Renaud ChaputR Renaud Chaput

        @thisismissem this is what went to Eugen + some legal fees around the complex legal restructuring that went alongside it.

        @evan @quillmatiq @dansup

        Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
        Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
        Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»
        wrote last edited by
        #173

        @renchap @evan @quillmatiq @dansup right, and that still served a purpose. It unblocked the organisation in order for the organisation to ship faster & to grow.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Laurens HofL Laurens Hof

          @thisismissem @stefan the reason for doing this multiplier is not so much for getting MAU right in absolute terms, but because mastodon/fedi MAU data also includes lurkers in their data. So you need it to get a fair comparison between fedi and the atmosphere

          ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
          ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
          ikuturso
          wrote last edited by
          #174

          @laurenshof eh, you can certainly speculate but then maybe you need to start thinking of the fact that estimating fediverse MAU is far less exact and likely to underreport because you have to make decisions about querying tens of thousands of servers and a significant chunk don't even report active users. Do you also apply this there?

          Laurens HofL 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ikutursoI ikuturso

            @laurenshof eh, you can certainly speculate but then maybe you need to start thinking of the fact that estimating fediverse MAU is far less exact and likely to underreport because you have to make decisions about querying tens of thousands of servers and a significant chunk don't even report active users. Do you also apply this there?

            Laurens HofL This user is from outside of this forum
            Laurens HofL This user is from outside of this forum
            Laurens Hof
            wrote last edited by
            #175

            @ikuturso yeah, theres really only one server where them not reporting mau makes a meaningful difference, and thats misskey.social. i had a post from summer 2024 i think where i estimated them at 250k mau at that point based on total post count, but havent done the analysis since

            ikutursoI 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • Laurens HofL Laurens Hof

              @ikuturso yeah, theres really only one server where them not reporting mau makes a meaningful difference, and thats misskey.social. i had a post from summer 2024 i think where i estimated them at 250k mau at that point based on total post count, but havent done the analysis since

              ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
              ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
              ikuturso
              wrote last edited by
              #176

              @laurenshof well that's the easy one to point to where it makes a huge difference but that doesn't mean the rest don't make a difference in aggregate.

              There are also some large instances that are widely (but not universally) defederated and usually not counted in the stats you can get from places like fedidb. That's in addition to the ones they simply miss.

              Laurens HofL 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ikutursoI ikuturso

                @laurenshof well that's the easy one to point to where it makes a huge difference but that doesn't mean the rest don't make a difference in aggregate.

                There are also some large instances that are widely (but not universally) defederated and usually not counted in the stats you can get from places like fedidb. That's in addition to the ones they simply miss.

                Laurens HofL This user is from outside of this forum
                Laurens HofL This user is from outside of this forum
                Laurens Hof
                wrote last edited by
                #177

                @ikuturso i run my own tracker set for this, which does include the Bad Places in the count. it does not make a meaningful difference in aggregate

                ikutursoI 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Laurens HofL Laurens Hof

                  @ikuturso i run my own tracker set for this, which does include the Bad Places in the count. it does not make a meaningful difference in aggregate

                  ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ikuturso
                  wrote last edited by
                  #178

                  @laurenshof so do you have some kind of a methodology for applying a multiplier accounting for how much your tracker misses?

                  Laurens HofL 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ikutursoI ikuturso

                    @laurenshof so do you have some kind of a methodology for applying a multiplier accounting for how much your tracker misses?

                    Laurens HofL This user is from outside of this forum
                    Laurens HofL This user is from outside of this forum
                    Laurens Hof
                    wrote last edited by
                    #179

                    @ikuturso i used to be a data analyst in previous jobs, what youre doing is asking the same type of questions PMs would ask me if the reporting gave results they didnt like
                    trying to tweak the methology wont magically make an uncomfortable number more comfortable

                    ikutursoI 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Laurens HofL Laurens Hof

                      @ikuturso yeah, theres really only one server where them not reporting mau makes a meaningful difference, and thats misskey.social. i had a post from summer 2024 i think where i estimated them at 250k mau at that point based on total post count, but havent done the analysis since

                      ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                      ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                      ikuturso
                      wrote last edited by
                      #180

                      @laurenshof I assume you mean misskey.io here but I wonder why you think only that instance can matter when most of them do not report it and the rest do make up for like 450k users compared to misskey.io's 750k.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Laurens HofL Laurens Hof

                        @ikuturso i used to be a data analyst in previous jobs, what youre doing is asking the same type of questions PMs would ask me if the reporting gave results they didnt like
                        trying to tweak the methology wont magically make an uncomfortable number more comfortable

                        ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ikuturso
                        wrote last edited by
                        #181

                        @laurenshof no what I'm doing is pointing out that you should have one standard. Now you seem to be taking a social media post and coming up with a random multiplier in one case.

                        You also have not made a very good case for why there cannot be a significant difference. "I used to be a data analyst" isn't really doing it for me, sorry.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Anuj AhoojaQ Anuj Ahooja

                          @evan @dansup The number of developers and communities who've been pushed out of the Fedi because of this elitist mentality should be alarming to any builder in this space. Are we ever going to learn to do better, or are we going to continue pushing more people away?

                          The vibes aren't good, Evan, and I really hope you're aware of that, because vibes make or break a community.

                          73 million seconds7 This user is from outside of this forum
                          73 million seconds7 This user is from outside of this forum
                          73 million seconds
                          wrote last edited by
                          #182

                          @quillmatiq @evan @dansup the vibes don't seem to be very great from the Bluesky side either. I do think it seems like gaslighting when there's this constant drumbeat of people who have clearly taken that side coming to blame it all on the AP people.

                          Maybe it wasn't always this way and the Bluesky vibes have shifted because the project doesn't seem to be doing all that well unfortunately. Whatever we think about Threads, it has clearly emerged as the main beneficiary of the Twitter takeover at this point.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»

                            @evan @dansup @quillmatiq Evan, perhaps spend some time introspecting why ActivityPub didn't get more adoption and why developers love AT Protocol.

                            ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                            ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                            ikuturso
                            wrote last edited by
                            #183

                            @thisismissem @evan @dansup @quillmatiq What developers love is not a great metric as becomes apparent if you follow the tech industry for a while.

                            Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ikutursoI ikuturso

                              @thisismissem @evan @dansup @quillmatiq What developers love is not a great metric as becomes apparent if you follow the tech industry for a while.

                              Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
                              Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
                              Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»
                              wrote last edited by
                              #184

                              @ikuturso @evan @dansup @quillmatiq well, you need developers to want to build great social experiences on protocols for any given protocol to succeed. They need to be productive to deliver the features regular people want, if the protocol prevents that, or doesn't provide what developers want, they'll do something else.

                              So yes, people first if we're looking at it from a product perspective; but if we're looking at it from a technological perspective, then yeah, it's developers you need to keep happy, so they can keep end-users of their software happy.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»

                                @renchap @evan @quillmatiq @dansup rich people who believe in the vision and want to see the future you're promising. They might not expect a 10x return, but let's not kid ourselves, they're putting in because there's something in it for them and they get a nice tax write-off.

                                If your donors stop donating because they no longer believe in the vision/team/etc, then that'll limit the project. You need these wealthy donors to stay happy, as much as Bluesky PBC needs their investors to stay happy.

                                Wealthy people with money to give/invest in support of a future you've sold them.

                                ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                                ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                                ikuturso
                                wrote last edited by
                                #185

                                @thisismissem @renchap @evan @quillmatiq @dansup you do still agree there is a massive difference between a donation and an investment right?

                                Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ikutursoI ikuturso

                                  @thisismissem @renchap @evan @quillmatiq @dansup you do still agree there is a massive difference between a donation and an investment right?

                                  Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #186

                                  @ikuturso @renchap @evan @quillmatiq @dansup it's really not that massive. It's still money from a billionaire.

                                  ikutursoI 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»

                                    @ikuturso @renchap @evan @quillmatiq @dansup it's really not that massive. It's still money from a billionaire.

                                    ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ikutursoI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ikuturso
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #187

                                    @thisismissem @renchap @evan @quillmatiq @dansup If all billionaire money is equally bad, then the incentive structure doesn’t matter. That’s a strange position for anyone worried about the power of money.

                                    Donors can express priorities, sure. That's soft influence. But it’s voluntary and reversible. Investments hard-code priorities into ownership, control, and profit-extraction rights.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»

                                      @mastodonmigration @baralheia @cwebber in Christine's article (and I've just spoken with her about it), it assumes a network topology that does not exist in the real world.

                                      It assumes that every user is on a different pds, and every user runs a full network relay. The reality is that multiple users are usually on a single PDS, and there's only like 12 relays.

                                      - 2 from bluesky (+ 1 deprecated)
                                      - 2 from hose.cam
                                      - 1 from blacksky
                                      - 1 from upcloud
                                      - 3 from firehose.network

                                      plus a few more from various people.

                                      In the ActivityPub ecosystem for every user to message every other user, you need connections between 30,000 servers.

                                      For the same in AT Protocol, you need connections between N PDS to one or more relays (most use the bluesky relay, which others get their list of PDSes from).

                                      Christine Lemmer-WebberC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Christine Lemmer-WebberC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Christine Lemmer-Webber
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #188

                                      @thisismissem @mastodonmigration @baralheia My analysis assumes a network architecture in which each node is a major participant in the functionality of the network, because as I argue in the piece, from a power distribution perspective of decentralization, it is important. What I describe in the piece is that if you want more than a pantheon of gods-eye view participants, then not having addressed delivery means that the system can't scale down.

                                      And this is true: you can run a gotosocial node that isn't *dependent* on other major players in the network, and it scales down great.

                                      The question is whether or not that matters and is important to people. Maybe it doesn't, I don't know. It matters to me, though.

                                      Christine Lemmer-WebberC Mastodon MigrationM 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Christine Lemmer-WebberC Christine Lemmer-Webber

                                        @thisismissem @mastodonmigration @baralheia My analysis assumes a network architecture in which each node is a major participant in the functionality of the network, because as I argue in the piece, from a power distribution perspective of decentralization, it is important. What I describe in the piece is that if you want more than a pantheon of gods-eye view participants, then not having addressed delivery means that the system can't scale down.

                                        And this is true: you can run a gotosocial node that isn't *dependent* on other major players in the network, and it scales down great.

                                        The question is whether or not that matters and is important to people. Maybe it doesn't, I don't know. It matters to me, though.

                                        Christine Lemmer-WebberC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Christine Lemmer-WebberC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Christine Lemmer-Webber
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #189

                                        @thisismissem @mastodonmigration @baralheia I also think that the ATmosphere and the fediverse could both learn a lot from each other. ATproto could adopt directed messaging, and the fediverse could adopt content addressing and portable identity, both of which I believe are important. This isn't a pivot, I have been saying these things *since 2017*, before ActivityPub became a recommendation, and before ATproto even came on the scene, including even in my co-proposal with Jay Graeber about what Bluesky could be, and including in the articles referenced previously.

                                        Unfortunately, I think there is a real risk that the fediverse is going to learn the *wrong* lessons from the ATmosphere, and adopt some of its "shared centralization" components, rather than the decentralization components that ATproto has that the fediverse doesn't yet. πŸ˜•

                                        maswanM Dan SummersS 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Christine Lemmer-WebberC Christine Lemmer-Webber

                                          @thisismissem @mastodonmigration @baralheia I also think that the ATmosphere and the fediverse could both learn a lot from each other. ATproto could adopt directed messaging, and the fediverse could adopt content addressing and portable identity, both of which I believe are important. This isn't a pivot, I have been saying these things *since 2017*, before ActivityPub became a recommendation, and before ATproto even came on the scene, including even in my co-proposal with Jay Graeber about what Bluesky could be, and including in the articles referenced previously.

                                          Unfortunately, I think there is a real risk that the fediverse is going to learn the *wrong* lessons from the ATmosphere, and adopt some of its "shared centralization" components, rather than the decentralization components that ATproto has that the fediverse doesn't yet. πŸ˜•

                                          maswanM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          maswanM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          maswan
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #190

                                          @cwebber
                                          @thisismissem @mastodonmigration @baralheia Content addressing and portable identity is so important and hurts so much everytime a server closes or (like me) had to switch domain name.

                                          gkrnoursG 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups