Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Firefox uses on-device downloaded-on-demand ML models for privacy-preserving translation.

Firefox uses on-device downloaded-on-demand ML models for privacy-preserving translation.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
289 Posts 146 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RichardM Richard

    @firefoxwebdevs The frame of this question is risible.

    I am begging you to just make a web browser.

    Make it the best browser for the open web. Make it a browser that empowers individuals. Make it a browser that defends users against threats.

    Do not make a search engine. Do not make a translation engine. Do not make a webpage summariser. Do not make a front-end for an LLM. Do not make a client-side LLM.

    Just. Make. A. Web. Browser.

    Please.

    mytwobits01M This user is from outside of this forum
    mytwobits01M This user is from outside of this forum
    mytwobits01
    wrote last edited by
    #275

    @m0rpk @firefoxwebdevs
    Can Firefox devs put up a Yes/No poll on whether they should just make a web browser? My vote is Yes.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Firefox for Web DevelopersF Firefox for Web Developers

      Firefox uses on-device downloaded-on-demand ML models for privacy-preserving translation.

      They're not LLMs. They're trained on open data.

      Should translation be disabled if the AI 'kill switch' is active?

      JeffC This user is from outside of this forum
      JeffC This user is from outside of this forum
      Jeff
      wrote last edited by
      #276

      @firefoxwebdevs

      Are you measuring the percentage of users engaging witj your AI chat options vs. those ignoring them? What are the numbers?

      How many users have you lost since?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Firefox for Web DevelopersF Firefox for Web Developers

        Firefox uses on-device downloaded-on-demand ML models for privacy-preserving translation.

        They're not LLMs. They're trained on open data.

        Should translation be disabled if the AI 'kill switch' is active?

        R This user is from outside of this forum
        R This user is from outside of this forum
        Risotto Bias
        wrote last edited by
        #277

        @firefoxwebdevs ...AI & ML should be off by default.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • shadowwwindS shadowwwind

          @tassoman @firefoxwebdevs the question is about the page translation feature, not chats.

          dpflugD This user is from outside of this forum
          dpflugD This user is from outside of this forum
          dpflug
          wrote last edited by
          #278

          @shadowwwind
          And as shared elsethread, they're pretty open with that feature: https://github.com/mozilla/translations

          Including pointing us to the training data they use, if I'm reading this right.
          @tassoman

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • TockT Tock

            @davidgerard @theorangetheme @theogrin @mdavis @firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social Such a waste, too. Years of standards fighting, differentiation with Gecko, then Quantum (see? I WAS a follower all along!) and being a model of what Open Source stewardship could mean for the larger Internet.

            RIP Mozilla, if you thought you were floundering as a Not for Profit Corp, you're worse than useless as a Marketing Agency.

            Morgan DavisM This user is from outside of this forum
            Morgan DavisM This user is from outside of this forum
            Morgan Davis
            wrote last edited by
            #279

            @Tock @davidgerard @theorangetheme @theogrin (Quick interjection: I love that everybody cares about Firefox enough to be bothered. If we didn’t, we’d be ignoring it completely. Nobody is talking about Opera.)

            I get all this. My worry is that everyone just turns their backs on Firefox and abandons it, it’ll just go away. And that leaves us with Chromium ONLY.

            I think we need to find productive ways to get what we need and stand firm on that. But killing it is not good for the web ecosystem.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • [object Object]Z [object Object]

              @tasket if you want a serious discussion about the role translations should or shouldn’t have in a browser, let me refer you to steve: https://hci.social/@fasterandworse/115849566354469222

              I don’t really feel anything about the translations feature other than disappointment, a bit of concern over how the data was sourced, and a strong feeling that it shouldn’t be a core browser feature

              dpflugD This user is from outside of this forum
              dpflugD This user is from outside of this forum
              dpflug
              wrote last edited by
              #280

              @zzt
              Here's the datasets they're using: https://opus.nlpl.eu/corpora
              @tasket

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • [object Object]Z [object Object]

                @davidgerard @mdavis@mastodon.social @firefoxwebdevs “but wait just let me explain the AI kill switch”, Mozilla continues to insist, as they slowly expand and transform into an SBF

                jwzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jwzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jwz
                wrote last edited by
                #281

                @zzt @davidgerard @firefoxwebdevs Mozilla spent 25 years being unable to get the "don't use tabs" preference to work and I'm supposed to believe their "turn off AI" preference will work?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • [object Object]Z [object Object]

                  @davidgerard @mdavis@mastodon.social @firefoxwebdevs “but wait just let me explain the AI kill switch”, Mozilla continues to insist, as they slowly expand and transform into an SBF

                  jwzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jwzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jwz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #282

                  @zzt @davidgerard @firefoxwebdevs What Mozilla needs now is an "AI kill switch" that can actually kill.

                  David GerardD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jwzJ jwz

                    @zzt @davidgerard @firefoxwebdevs What Mozilla needs now is an "AI kill switch" that can actually kill.

                    David GerardD This user is from outside of this forum
                    David GerardD This user is from outside of this forum
                    David Gerard
                    wrote last edited by
                    #283

                    @jwz @zzt @firefoxwebdevs we added an extension to send 440 volts through the other guy's chair

                    1M+ installs first week, 0 users remaining second week

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jwzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jwzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jwz
                      wrote last edited by
                      #284

                      @dejantesicnaarm *plonk*

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • David GerardD David Gerard

                        @RAOF @gatesvp yeah, the whole thing is dissembling weasel speak. None of this discussion was proposed by Mozilla with sincerity.

                        Gaëtan PerraultG This user is from outside of this forum
                        Gaëtan PerraultG This user is from outside of this forum
                        Gaëtan Perrault
                        wrote last edited by
                        #285

                        @davidgerard @RAOF If your core belief is that Mozilla is failing to serve at the benefit of its members, then what are you even doing on this thread? You just hoping to harass the Dev account until they block you out of spite?

                        What evidence could any of us provide that would change your mind and cause you to become a Mozilla booster instead?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T twifkak

                          @firefoxwebdevs What do you mean "open data"? https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/toolkit/components/translations/resources/01_overview.html points to https://browser.mt/ points to https://paracrawl.eu/index.php which says "We do not own any of the text from which these data has been extracted."

                          Philip Mallegol-HansenP This user is from outside of this forum
                          Philip Mallegol-HansenP This user is from outside of this forum
                          Philip Mallegol-Hansen
                          wrote last edited by
                          #286

                          @twifkak @firefoxwebdevs +1, the definition of “open data” is extremely important.

                          It’s only okay if it was *consensually* trained.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Firefox for Web DevelopersF Firefox for Web Developers

                            Firefox uses on-device downloaded-on-demand ML models for privacy-preserving translation.

                            They're not LLMs. They're trained on open data.

                            Should translation be disabled if the AI 'kill switch' is active?

                            Nimona RESISTSV This user is from outside of this forum
                            Nimona RESISTSV This user is from outside of this forum
                            Nimona RESISTS
                            wrote last edited by
                            #287

                            @firefoxwebdevs I want Firefox to be a great web browser. You'll notice that I didn't say LLM, ML, AI or anything like that. I don't want that stuff. I just want FF to be a good web browser without being infected by AI. Why is that difficult to understand?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S ShadSterling

                              @chillicampari @firefoxwebdevs @joepie91 ➡️ But that alone won’t be enough to rebuild trust; I’d like to suggest something that would help with that, but unfortunately that’s far outside my wheelhouse
                              ⏹️

                              Brett RS This user is from outside of this forum
                              Brett RS This user is from outside of this forum
                              Brett R
                              wrote last edited by
                              #288

                              @ShadSterling @chillicampari @firefoxwebdevs @joepie91 Rebuilding trust is exactly that - you can't restore or reset trust, you have to build it again, over time and multiple instances, just as you did the first time. Unlike your past self, you've already shown that you will violate trust, so it will take more time and more instances.

                              Anything less doesn't result in actual trust.

                              I agree that "AI" isn't going to work as a term to build trust.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • David GerardD David Gerard

                                @cassidy @firefoxwebdevs this is because it's an AI marketing lie. "ha, you say you hate slop, so does that mean you hate *xrays* now? Checkmate, AI hater!"

                                G. WozniakG This user is from outside of this forum
                                G. WozniakG This user is from outside of this forum
                                G. Wozniak
                                wrote last edited by
                                #289

                                @davidgerard @cassidy @firefoxwebdevs Even the goalposts are slop now.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R AodeRelay shared this topic
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups