“Such and such Senator disagrees with Trump about nationalizing elections”
-
“Such and such Senator disagrees with Trump about nationalizing elections”
Well, my dear media editors, it doesn’t fucking matter what either the Senator or Mr. Trump think. Constitutionally, the control over elections is given to the states. Absent an amendment, there is no such thing as nationalizing elections in the US.
-
“Such and such Senator disagrees with Trump about nationalizing elections”
Well, my dear media editors, it doesn’t fucking matter what either the Senator or Mr. Trump think. Constitutionally, the control over elections is given to the states. Absent an amendment, there is no such thing as nationalizing elections in the US.
@mcnado Let's see which lickspittle suck-up willing fellater of Nazis will suggest this needs to be priority one.
-
“Such and such Senator disagrees with Trump about nationalizing elections”
Well, my dear media editors, it doesn’t fucking matter what either the Senator or Mr. Trump think. Constitutionally, the control over elections is given to the states. Absent an amendment, there is no such thing as nationalizing elections in the US.
-
“Such and such Senator disagrees with Trump about nationalizing elections”
Well, my dear media editors, it doesn’t fucking matter what either the Senator or Mr. Trump think. Constitutionally, the control over elections is given to the states. Absent an amendment, there is no such thing as nationalizing elections in the US.
because the Trumpies are so good about following laws
-
“Such and such Senator disagrees with Trump about nationalizing elections”
Well, my dear media editors, it doesn’t fucking matter what either the Senator or Mr. Trump think. Constitutionally, the control over elections is given to the states. Absent an amendment, there is no such thing as nationalizing elections in the US.
Are news editors still literate?
-
R ActivityRelay shared this topic
