Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
59 Posts 43 Posters 67 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

    "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

    THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

    Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
    Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
    Ray McCarthy
    wrote last edited by
    #47

    @sundogplanets
    The Kardashev "levels" are pure fantasy, not even good SF.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      Cress
      wrote last edited by
      #48

      @sundogplanets I am fine with this, not because I am happy with having our eternal view of the heavens f*cked up by stinking billionaires and impotent regulation, but because this situation is unmanageable from a physics and mechanics perspective. If all the operators in this sector do this then when 1 sat fails its going to be a big issue. It will make orbital space unaccessible which to me is better as it forces us to show respect and consideration!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

        I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

        Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

        PalmAndNeedleP This user is from outside of this forum
        PalmAndNeedleP This user is from outside of this forum
        PalmAndNeedle
        wrote last edited by
        #49

        @sundogplanets I do feel like we're on the path to Neil Stephenson's Seven Eves somehow

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

          I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

          Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

          Isaac Ji KuoI This user is from outside of this forum
          Isaac Ji KuoI This user is from outside of this forum
          Isaac Ji Kuo
          wrote last edited by
          #50

          @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social I have three non-techbro mentality/religion reasons for this:

          1) Distract from Tesla's poor earnings
          2) Distract from the Epstein files
          3) Bezos says he's going to launch zillions of data center satellites so Musk just wants to nab scamee money for it first

          But yeah, also Musk is a moron.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

            https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

            John Q McDonaldJ This user is from outside of this forum
            John Q McDonaldJ This user is from outside of this forum
            John Q McDonald
            wrote last edited by
            #51

            @sundogplanets Skynet

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

              https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

              Emilio ʕ̡̢̡ʘ̅͟͜͡ʘ̲̅ʔ̢̡̢🇩🇰M This user is from outside of this forum
              Emilio ʕ̡̢̡ʘ̅͟͜͡ʘ̲̅ʔ̢̡̢🇩🇰M This user is from outside of this forum
              Emilio ʕ̡̢̡ʘ̅͟͜͡ʘ̲̅ʔ̢̡̢🇩🇰
              wrote last edited by
              #52

              @sundogplanets @Nonya_Bidniss 😲😲😲

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                Chris Green
                wrote last edited by
                #53

                @sundogplanets That's what everyone in datacenters wants - unfixable latency and multimillion dollar costs to replace equipment..

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                  What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                  Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                  https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                  Embrace Civil DisobedienceP This user is from outside of this forum
                  Embrace Civil DisobedienceP This user is from outside of this forum
                  Embrace Civil Disobedience
                  wrote last edited by
                  #54

                  @sundogplanets Trash filling space with trash.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mkjM mkj

                    @nev Or when you're reading science fiction which was intended to be a warning, and treating it as something that should be done because it's Cool™!

                    "I have read Do Not Build The Torment Nexus and decided to dedicate the rest of my life to ensuring that we *never* have a Torment Nexus" said no billionaire ever.

                    @sundogplanets

                    neville parkN This user is from outside of this forum
                    neville parkN This user is from outside of this forum
                    neville park
                    wrote last edited by
                    #55

                    @mkj @sundogplanets god knows the Western Canon™ is stodgy and Eurocentric and male-centric and all that, but like, Greek legends and the Bible and such give you the 101 versions that science fiction writers are adapting/riffing on/inspired by. what i'm trying to say is, even the most basic bitch humanities education could have helped these people

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                      BelakorN This user is from outside of this forum
                      BelakorN This user is from outside of this forum
                      Belakor
                      wrote last edited by
                      #56

                      @sundogplanets This is just a VC scam.
                      1. The timeline on launching a million satellites, even "small" ones is decades.

                      2. Near vacuum isn't a magical environment for heat management.

                      3. Power from where exactly? And don't say sunlight cause the amount of capture panels needed would be an order of magnitude more material to power a data center.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                        https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                        CountMoosferatuC This user is from outside of this forum
                        CountMoosferatuC This user is from outside of this forum
                        CountMoosferatu
                        wrote last edited by
                        #57

                        @sundogplanets Bye, nice telescope views, etc. Hello, Kessler syndrome.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                          https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                          ティージェーグレェT This user is from outside of this forum
                          ティージェーグレェT This user is from outside of this forum
                          ティージェーグレェ
                          wrote last edited by
                          #58
                          I noticed in the credits of re-watching the 4K remastering of Hard Boiled that there was some security company called Starlink, decades ago. fElon Musk couldn't even pick a name that hadn't already been used before.

                          IMHO, it would probably be cheaper to run fiber to the home, even in the most remote rural areas, than to pollute our skies with satellites for high latency Internet access. But, what do I know? I think last time I checked a 50km spool of single mode fiber could be bought for under $1000.
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                            https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                            AlisonW ♿🏳️‍🌈♾️A This user is from outside of this forum
                            AlisonW ♿🏳️‍🌈♾️A This user is from outside of this forum
                            AlisonW ♿🏳️‍🌈♾️
                            wrote last edited by
                            #59

                            @sundogplanets
                            You can't have effective data centres in space though!
                            https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-good-idea/

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups