Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Really good explainer video from Vox on why expanding the House - and adding an option for multi-member districts with ranked choice voting - would make our democracy more democratic.

Really good explainer video from Vox on why expanding the House - and adding an option for multi-member districts with ranked choice voting - would make our democracy more democratic.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
7 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Sean CastenS This user is from outside of this forum
    Sean CastenS This user is from outside of this forum
    Sean Casten
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Really good explainer video from Vox on why expanding the House - and adding an option for multi-member districts with ranked choice voting - would make our democracy more democratic. (And my bill to do that.) https://youtu.be/KhQGHY44XPM?si=rm4k_RwIusxPOJkr

    Pauliehedron   ✅  :donor:P excited for the mastodon riseQ slyborgS 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • Sean CastenS Sean Casten

      Really good explainer video from Vox on why expanding the House - and adding an option for multi-member districts with ranked choice voting - would make our democracy more democratic. (And my bill to do that.) https://youtu.be/KhQGHY44XPM?si=rm4k_RwIusxPOJkr

      Pauliehedron   ✅  :donor:P This user is from outside of this forum
      Pauliehedron   ✅  :donor:P This user is from outside of this forum
      Pauliehedron ✅ :donor:
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @SeanCasten Same with the SCOTUS. Should be at least two justices per district, if not half a dozen per.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Sean CastenS Sean Casten

        Really good explainer video from Vox on why expanding the House - and adding an option for multi-member districts with ranked choice voting - would make our democracy more democratic. (And my bill to do that.) https://youtu.be/KhQGHY44XPM?si=rm4k_RwIusxPOJkr

        excited for the mastodon riseQ This user is from outside of this forum
        excited for the mastodon riseQ This user is from outside of this forum
        excited for the mastodon rise
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @SeanCasten I saw that! It was great!

        I used to be a big fan of proportional rep and multi-member district, but I'm watching Europe's parliaments get totally deadlocked and not be able to keep government running, and I'm wondering if multi-member isn't helping.

        Has anyone tried something like the US system but just with RCV*?

        * By RCV, I mean any modern voting system, I'm not picky... approval, condorcent, ranked, whatever...they're all better.

        Sean CastenS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • excited for the mastodon riseQ excited for the mastodon rise

          @SeanCasten I saw that! It was great!

          I used to be a big fan of proportional rep and multi-member district, but I'm watching Europe's parliaments get totally deadlocked and not be able to keep government running, and I'm wondering if multi-member isn't helping.

          Has anyone tried something like the US system but just with RCV*?

          * By RCV, I mean any modern voting system, I'm not picky... approval, condorcent, ranked, whatever...they're all better.

          Sean CastenS This user is from outside of this forum
          Sean CastenS This user is from outside of this forum
          Sean Casten
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @qkslvrwolf the smart political scientist types we talked to in working on our bill weren't wild about RCV only if it includes instant run off because of the possibility for weird outcomes where randos could get in by being everyone's 2nd favorite. So if you do RCV only, it's better suited to narrow the field and then have a 2nd race with the top vote getters.

          Sean CastenS excited for the mastodon riseQ 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • Sean CastenS Sean Casten

            @qkslvrwolf the smart political scientist types we talked to in working on our bill weren't wild about RCV only if it includes instant run off because of the possibility for weird outcomes where randos could get in by being everyone's 2nd favorite. So if you do RCV only, it's better suited to narrow the field and then have a 2nd race with the top vote getters.

            Sean CastenS This user is from outside of this forum
            Sean CastenS This user is from outside of this forum
            Sean Casten
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @qkslvrwolf (Obviously this doesn't apply in a multimember situation since the weird effects of ranking don't come into play.)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Sean CastenS Sean Casten

              @qkslvrwolf the smart political scientist types we talked to in working on our bill weren't wild about RCV only if it includes instant run off because of the possibility for weird outcomes where randos could get in by being everyone's 2nd favorite. So if you do RCV only, it's better suited to narrow the field and then have a 2nd race with the top vote getters.

              excited for the mastodon riseQ This user is from outside of this forum
              excited for the mastodon riseQ This user is from outside of this forum
              excited for the mastodon rise
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @SeanCasten Thank you for responding! Yeah, I know the folks that do the math tend to be really worried about that but I'd be curious to see how it worked out if we tried it at scale.

              But also, I'm not too worried about a second round, although I get that gets into cost.

              My layman's impression just watching the world, though, is that multi-member districting seems to come with some severe polarization issues of it's own, whereas the evidence we have is 1-person RCV seems to encourage work

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Sean CastenS Sean Casten

                Really good explainer video from Vox on why expanding the House - and adding an option for multi-member districts with ranked choice voting - would make our democracy more democratic. (And my bill to do that.) https://youtu.be/KhQGHY44XPM?si=rm4k_RwIusxPOJkr

                slyborgS This user is from outside of this forum
                slyborgS This user is from outside of this forum
                slyborg
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @SeanCasten I’ve been waiting for someone to start making a push for this in order to dilute the effect of money in politics, but I fear that in letting the billionaire become a trillionaire class that it is already too late. I think a larger Congress needs to be paired with campaign finance and lobbying legislation with the loopholes closed … as well as tax law to cut this obscene wealth down to size.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups