Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I guess people are just going to keep discovering that you can't really make a C compiler do constant time

I guess people are just going to keep discovering that you can't really make a C compiler do constant time

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
31 Posts 14 Posters 70 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • John RegehrR John Regehr

    "Can it be fair to require the average programmer to understand inline assembly, or any of these other inherently obtuse obfuscation techniques?"

    can it be fair for the average programmer (if they don't understand this stuff) to just not write code where timing channels matter? who even writes these articles

    David BeazleyD This user is from outside of this forum
    David BeazleyD This user is from outside of this forum
    David Beazley
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @regehr What about fractions?

    ROTOPE~1 ⭐️R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • David BeazleyD David Beazley

      @regehr What about fractions?

      ROTOPE~1 ⭐️R This user is from outside of this forum
      ROTOPE~1 ⭐️R This user is from outside of this forum
      ROTOPE~1 ⭐️
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      @dabeaz 🐸

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • DougallD This user is from outside of this forum
        DougallD This user is from outside of this forum
        Dougall
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @rygorous @regehr And ABI-related bugs can be much more insidious than I once thought, since they're not guaranteed to actually crash as one might expect. They can just lurk there as vulnerabilities, potentially causing crashes in totally unrelated code:

        https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2022/11/21/please-restore-our-registers-when-youre-done-with-them/

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • John RegehrR John Regehr

          "Can it be fair to require the average programmer to understand inline assembly, or any of these other inherently obtuse obfuscation techniques?"

          can it be fair for the average programmer (if they don't understand this stuff) to just not write code where timing channels matter? who even writes these articles

          SiguzaS This user is from outside of this forum
          SiguzaS This user is from outside of this forum
          Siguza
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @regehr even the best programmers in the world struggle with this kind of stuff, ffs...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Per VognsenP This user is from outside of this forum
            Per VognsenP This user is from outside of this forum
            Per Vognsen
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @rygorous @regehr Petition to rename to -fun-math.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Per VognsenP This user is from outside of this forum
              Per VognsenP This user is from outside of this forum
              Per Vognsen
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @rygorous @regehr -fhonor-yahweh -fhonor-buddha -fhonor-brahma just to be safe. You need all the help you can get with -ffast-math.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • John RegehrR This user is from outside of this forum
                John RegehrR This user is from outside of this forum
                John Regehr
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @rygorous

                well, if the problems are important enough, something like this:

                https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-constant-time-coding-support/87781

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • John RegehrR John Regehr

                  I guess people are just going to keep discovering that you can't really make a C compiler do constant time

                  https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/09/compilers_undermine_encryption/

                  kaoudisK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kaoudisK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kaoudis
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @regehr all I will say to that is eyup

                  John RegehrR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • John RegehrR This user is from outside of this forum
                    John RegehrR This user is from outside of this forum
                    John Regehr
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @rygorous @pervognsen aw, look at all the little nans and infs flying and being free!!!

                    Per VognsenP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • kaoudisK kaoudis

                      @regehr all I will say to that is eyup

                      John RegehrR This user is from outside of this forum
                      John RegehrR This user is from outside of this forum
                      John Regehr
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @kaoudis I've not been paying too much attention to the LLVM effort-- anything interesting going on there? or should I just dig into the discourse?

                      kaoudisK 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • John RegehrR John Regehr

                        @rygorous @pervognsen aw, look at all the little nans and infs flying and being free!!!

                        Per VognsenP This user is from outside of this forum
                        Per VognsenP This user is from outside of this forum
                        Per Vognsen
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        @regehr @rygorous My first thought was, if this is meant for the far future, assuming they retain our current warning symbol for radiation seems a bit hopeful.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • John RegehrR John Regehr

                          @kaoudis I've not been paying too much attention to the LLVM effort-- anything interesting going on there? or should I just dig into the discourse?

                          kaoudisK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kaoudisK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kaoudis
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          @regehr I think* @wizardengineer landed the first bits of that work!

                          *I left trail of bits voluntarily (and for reasons unrelated) a bit before this happened though

                          John RegehrR 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Janne MorenJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Janne MorenJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Janne Moren
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            @rygorous @regehr
                            Rename to -ffast-bad-math perhaps?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • kaoudisK kaoudis

                              @regehr I think* @wizardengineer landed the first bits of that work!

                              *I left trail of bits voluntarily (and for reasons unrelated) a bit before this happened though

                              John RegehrR This user is from outside of this forum
                              John RegehrR This user is from outside of this forum
                              John Regehr
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              @kaoudis @wizardengineer ah! I don't think I knew that. where are you at right now?

                              kaoudisK 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Janne MorenJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Janne MorenJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Janne Moren
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                @rygorous @regehr
                                -flooks-like-math-if-you-squint

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • John RegehrR John Regehr

                                  I guess people are just going to keep discovering that you can't really make a C compiler do constant time

                                  https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/09/compilers_undermine_encryption/

                                  William D. JonesC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  William D. JonesC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  William D. Jones
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  @regehr Maybe it's time to write new assemblers that complement NASM*.

                                  * Or MASM; I wish NASM had an invoke keyword, like MASM, to abstract away calling conventions. Rather than writing a macro for it.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Andy GockeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Andy GockeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Andy Gocke
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27

                                    @rygorous @regehr We've had a hell of a time with our macos ARM64 ASM. Last ~3 ld64 updates have all had reloc problems

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • John RegehrR John Regehr

                                      @kaoudis @wizardengineer ah! I don't think I knew that. where are you at right now?

                                      kaoudisK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kaoudisK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kaoudis
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      @regehr @wizardengineer Strava! I’m doing appsec over there

                                      John RegehrR 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • kaoudisK kaoudis

                                        @regehr @wizardengineer Strava! I’m doing appsec over there

                                        John RegehrR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        John RegehrR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        John Regehr
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #29

                                        @kaoudis @wizardengineer awesome!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • John RegehrR John Regehr

                                          I guess people are just going to keep discovering that you can't really make a C compiler do constant time

                                          https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/09/compilers_undermine_encryption/

                                          Pierre H.M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Pierre H.M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Pierre H.
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #30

                                          @regehr yes you can, unless you care about correct results too.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups