Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It’s really surprising to me that the #fediverse hasn’t agreed on a standardized way to open cross-instance #activitypub objects and instead relies on links that open in the browser.

It’s really surprising to me that the #fediverse hasn’t agreed on a standardized way to open cross-instance #activitypub objects and instead relies on links that open in the browser.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
fediverseactivitypuburischeme
103 Posts 11 Posters 96 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • infinite love ⴳT infinite love ⴳ

    @benpate @ricferrer @evan @julian @rimu native apps can also expose share targets so you can "share" the current web URL to those apps and it opens in those apps.

    ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
    ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
    ricferrer
    wrote last edited by
    #45

    @trwnh @benpate @evan @julian @rimu share targets opens a new post, which is expected behavior

    I think waiting for all browsers to allow extensions and then waiting for extensions to exist and then expecting the user to know which to use is not very realistic or short term.

    infinite love ⴳT ricferrerR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • Ben Pate 🤘🏻B Ben Pate 🤘🏻

      Can you expand on this idea? I know toots are short, but this is interesting and I want to better understand what you’re proposing here.

      👉🏻👈🏻

      @trwnh @ricferrer @evan @julian @rimu

      infinite love ⴳT This user is from outside of this forum
      infinite love ⴳT This user is from outside of this forum
      infinite love ⴳ
      wrote last edited by
      #46

      @benpate what mastodon and piefed and browser.pub do, basically.

      open a link like https://browser.pub/https://mastodon.social/@benpate/116025296487246556 and then click any of the other links. you should remain in browser.pub.

      Ben Pate 🤘🏻B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • infinite love ⴳT infinite love ⴳ

        @benpate what mastodon and piefed and browser.pub do, basically.

        open a link like https://browser.pub/https://mastodon.social/@benpate/116025296487246556 and then click any of the other links. you should remain in browser.pub.

        Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
        Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
        Ben Pate 🤘🏻
        wrote last edited by
        #47

        @trwnh Thank you. I understand what you’re saying. They’re rewriting links in the post to keep you on that site. I’ll need to keep this idea in my toolbox.. it will be useful.

        ricferrerR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Ben Pate 🤘🏻B Ben Pate 🤘🏻

          In the end, we need real “share” and “like” buttons for the Fediverse - with as few clicks as possible - wrapped up as easily installable widgets that go next to Twitter and Facebook on every site online.

          (That’s step 1)

          Once we do this, step 2 is to lobby sites to JUST use Fediverse buttons, and drop the ones for hateful platforms.

          @trwnh @ricferrer @evan @julian @rimu

          dansupD This user is from outside of this forum
          dansupD This user is from outside of this forum
          dansup
          wrote last edited by
          #48

          @benpate @trwnh @ricferrer @evan @julian @rimu I’m actually working on implementing your Activity Intents FEP in Loops right now, using autocomplete from FediDB it’s quite powerful!

          Ben Pate 🤘🏻B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ricferrerR ricferrer

            @trwnh @benpate @evan @julian @rimu share targets opens a new post, which is expected behavior

            I think waiting for all browsers to allow extensions and then waiting for extensions to exist and then expecting the user to know which to use is not very realistic or short term.

            infinite love ⴳT This user is from outside of this forum
            infinite love ⴳT This user is from outside of this forum
            infinite love ⴳ
            wrote last edited by
            #49

            @ricferrer to repeat: you don't need the extensions. they are just one option to making things simpler. i described at least 2 other options that are all complementary:

            - rewrite links to keep you in-app
            - content-type handlers to get you in the right app
            - extensions to also get you in the right app
            - share targets to get you in the right app (on mobile)

            you can use one, some, all, or none of these. the first one is the most important; the others should also be easy to do right now.

            infinite love ⴳT ricferrerR 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • dansupD dansup

              @benpate @trwnh @ricferrer @evan @julian @rimu I’m actually working on implementing your Activity Intents FEP in Loops right now, using autocomplete from FediDB it’s quite powerful!

              Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
              Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
              Ben Pate 🤘🏻
              wrote last edited by
              #50

              This is AMAZING, Dan, and it would be a huge win. #ThankYouThankYouThankYou!!!

              @dansup @trwnh @ricferrer @evan @julian @rimu

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ricferrerR ricferrer

                @trwnh @benpate @evan @julian @rimu share targets opens a new post, which is expected behavior

                I think waiting for all browsers to allow extensions and then waiting for extensions to exist and then expecting the user to know which to use is not very realistic or short term.

                ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                ricferrer
                wrote last edited by
                #51

                @trwnh @benpate @evan @julian @rimu
                I am focused on what can we do pragmatically and realistically as a community to fix the broken experience to help get more people into the fediverse.

                A mix of

                1) JavaScript for websites that want to link to the fediverse that trigger ap: and offer http fallback (just like fb: before 2015)

                2) adding support for ap: on fedi clients

                It’s something we can do now. It works and we don’t have to wait for big tech

                infinite love ⴳT Ben Pate 🤘🏻B 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • infinite love ⴳT infinite love ⴳ

                  @ricferrer to repeat: you don't need the extensions. they are just one option to making things simpler. i described at least 2 other options that are all complementary:

                  - rewrite links to keep you in-app
                  - content-type handlers to get you in the right app
                  - extensions to also get you in the right app
                  - share targets to get you in the right app (on mobile)

                  you can use one, some, all, or none of these. the first one is the most important; the others should also be easy to do right now.

                  infinite love ⴳT This user is from outside of this forum
                  infinite love ⴳT This user is from outside of this forum
                  infinite love ⴳ
                  wrote last edited by
                  #52

                  @ricferrer browser support would be the icing on the cake, but i think that extensions are actually not as unrealistic as you are saying. many people end up with extensions installed almost by accident. at the end of the day, if you open an app like mastodon, you have to be prompted to do certain things like enabling notifications and registering stuff like that.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ricferrerR ricferrer

                    @trwnh @benpate @evan @julian @rimu
                    I am focused on what can we do pragmatically and realistically as a community to fix the broken experience to help get more people into the fediverse.

                    A mix of

                    1) JavaScript for websites that want to link to the fediverse that trigger ap: and offer http fallback (just like fb: before 2015)

                    2) adding support for ap: on fedi clients

                    It’s something we can do now. It works and we don’t have to wait for big tech

                    infinite love ⴳT This user is from outside of this forum
                    infinite love ⴳT This user is from outside of this forum
                    infinite love ⴳ
                    wrote last edited by
                    #53

                    @ricferrer @benpate @evan @julian @rimu doing ap: will fail for anyone who doesn't understand ap: which by default is everyone

                    ricferrerR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • infinite love ⴳT infinite love ⴳ

                      @ricferrer to repeat: you don't need the extensions. they are just one option to making things simpler. i described at least 2 other options that are all complementary:

                      - rewrite links to keep you in-app
                      - content-type handlers to get you in the right app
                      - extensions to also get you in the right app
                      - share targets to get you in the right app (on mobile)

                      you can use one, some, all, or none of these. the first one is the most important; the others should also be easy to do right now.

                      ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ricferrer
                      wrote last edited by
                      #54

                      @trwnh staying in app is the simplest solution. But the challenge is getting me from the browser to the app without me having to install anything or use the share intent workaround, which doesn’t work because it opens a “new post” as expected by the user when they select “share”

                      infinite love ⴳT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ricferrerR ricferrer

                        @trwnh staying in app is the simplest solution. But the challenge is getting me from the browser to the app without me having to install anything or use the share intent workaround, which doesn’t work because it opens a “new post” as expected by the user when they select “share”

                        infinite love ⴳT This user is from outside of this forum
                        infinite love ⴳT This user is from outside of this forum
                        infinite love ⴳ
                        wrote last edited by
                        #55

                        @ricferrer you have to at minimum register a handler, no? how is that any different than "installing"?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ricferrerR ricferrer

                          @trwnh @benpate @evan @julian @rimu
                          I am focused on what can we do pragmatically and realistically as a community to fix the broken experience to help get more people into the fediverse.

                          A mix of

                          1) JavaScript for websites that want to link to the fediverse that trigger ap: and offer http fallback (just like fb: before 2015)

                          2) adding support for ap: on fedi clients

                          It’s something we can do now. It works and we don’t have to wait for big tech

                          Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
                          Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
                          Ben Pate 🤘🏻
                          wrote last edited by
                          #56

                          Yes. I agree with just moving forward with the tech we have.

                          What would the JavaScript do, exactly?

                          What parts of this would require a new ap:// protocol, or could we accomplish this with regular https:// links?

                          Also: thanks for starting this conversation. I think it’s very helpful and timely!

                          @ricferrer @trwnh @evan @julian @rimu

                          ricferrerR 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • infinite love ⴳT infinite love ⴳ

                            @ricferrer @benpate @evan @julian @rimu doing ap: will fail for anyone who doesn't understand ap: which by default is everyone

                            ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                            ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                            ricferrer
                            wrote last edited by
                            #57

                            @trwnh @benpate @evan @julian @rimu it worked before 2015 for twitter:, fb:, instagram: in the time of highest growth. Nobody needed to understand anything. It just worked because it was implemented with JavaScript and used http as a fallback which always worked even if the uri scheme failed

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Ben Pate 🤘🏻B Ben Pate 🤘🏻

                              @trwnh Thank you. I understand what you’re saying. They’re rewriting links in the post to keep you on that site. I’ll need to keep this idea in my toolbox.. it will be useful.

                              ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                              ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                              ricferrer
                              wrote last edited by
                              #58

                              @benpate @trwnh it’s basically using browser.pub as a webclient or activity viewer, right?

                              If I understand correctly it doesn’t solve the problem that I am logged in in my app and not in the browser

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Ben Pate 🤘🏻B Ben Pate 🤘🏻

                                In the end, we need real “share” and “like” buttons for the Fediverse - with as few clicks as possible - wrapped up as easily installable widgets that go next to Twitter and Facebook on every site online.

                                (That’s step 1)

                                Once we do this, step 2 is to lobby sites to JUST use Fediverse buttons, and drop the ones for hateful platforms.

                                @trwnh @ricferrer @evan @julian @rimu

                                ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                ricferrer
                                wrote last edited by
                                #59

                                @benpate @trwnh @evan @julian @rimu I agree. That’s I like the uri scheme solution, which takes inspiration from the approach twitter, fb, instagram used before universal/app like in 2015 to achieve massive growth

                                Ben Pate 🤘🏻B 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • infinite love ⴳT infinite love ⴳ

                                  @ricferrer @benpate @evan @julian @rimu in any case the thing all fedi apps can do "right now" (without any ecosystem changes otherwise) is to try to load all https: links locally before kicking users out. this is at least half of the problem solved right away.

                                  ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ricferrer
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #60

                                  @trwnh @benpate @evan @julian @rimu totally agree. That’s the “easy” part

                                  Then there is the other way around… going from the browser to a fedi client instead of a website if I have an app installed

                                  Ben Pate 🤘🏻B 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ricferrerR ricferrer

                                    @benpate @trwnh @evan @julian @rimu I agree. That’s I like the uri scheme solution, which takes inspiration from the approach twitter, fb, instagram used before universal/app like in 2015 to achieve massive growth

                                    Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Ben Pate 🤘🏻
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #61

                                    Here’s a question: do browsers let JavaScript introspect what custom protocol handlers are available/installed?

                                    I’m planning a Franken-widget that works with whatever tools are available.

                                    Activity Intents? Sure

                                    Custom protocol? Okay, we’ll use that too.

                                    None of the above? Sniff the server and polyfill.

                                    We could certainly try an “AND” approach, if JavaScript will let us.

                                    @ricferrer @trwnh @evan @julian @rimu

                                    ricferrerR 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Ben Pate 🤘🏻B Ben Pate 🤘🏻

                                      Yes. I agree with just moving forward with the tech we have.

                                      What would the JavaScript do, exactly?

                                      What parts of this would require a new ap:// protocol, or could we accomplish this with regular https:// links?

                                      Also: thanks for starting this conversation. I think it’s very helpful and timely!

                                      @ricferrer @trwnh @evan @julian @rimu

                                      ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ricferrerR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ricferrer
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #62

                                      @benpate @trwnh @evan @julian @rimu
                                      Maybe I did not explain it well. Fb, twitter, instagram used JavaScript to try to open their uri. If it failed, they opened the http equivalent

                                      The user did not notice much. If they had the app, it jumped. Sometimes if you returned to the browser the http was opened anyways. But that’s wasn’t very annoying

                                      Ben Pate 🤘🏻B julianJ 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ricferrerR ricferrer

                                        @benpate @trwnh @evan @julian @rimu I agree. That’s I like the uri scheme solution, which takes inspiration from the approach twitter, fb, instagram used before universal/app like in 2015 to achieve massive growth

                                        Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Ben Pate 🤘🏻
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #63

                                        Also, you can see this running right now on bandwagon.fm.

                                        You can remote follow right from a band page, or even from a page of search results.

                                        This works with just about any Fedi server by polyfilling the oStatus remote follow logic

                                        If you’re in an #Emissary server you can also do remote likes, too

                                        Could you try out the workflow I have in place right now? My goal is to expand this, make it all JS (no server-side required) then package it for everyone

                                        @ricferrer @trwnh @evan @julian @rimu

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ricferrerR ricferrer

                                          @trwnh @benpate @evan @julian @rimu totally agree. That’s the “easy” part

                                          Then there is the other way around… going from the browser to a fedi client instead of a website if I have an app installed

                                          Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Ben Pate 🤘🏻B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Ben Pate 🤘🏻
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #64

                                          And I thing this “other way around” — going from a remote server to your home server — is the most important use case.

                                          Let’s lock this down and get “share” buttons everywhere.

                                          @ricferrer @trwnh @evan @julian @rimu

                                          infinite love ⴳT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups