Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "barely legal" is a key word phrase from the porn industry used to describe 18 year olds.

"barely legal" is a key word phrase from the porn industry used to describe 18 year olds.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
48 Posts 23 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jeff CodesJ Jeff Codes

    @carrideen @futurebird
    There is not a world in which this is ethical behavior. Unethical at minimum, and dismissible IMO.
    The inherent power differential between facility and student places a pressure to comply on the student. Consent within power differentials hard to navigate. That’s why most places have rules against bosses dating subordinates. Too much potential for abuse, or favoritism.
    Add in the relative immaturity of 18-22-year-olds and that power gap grows. Our brains are not done developing until middle-late twenty’s. Presumably, a prof has hit that point and has more life experience, where the student has not. Another way the student is disadvantaged in these interactions.
    Any institution that does not explicitly denounce this behavior, and set up safeguards for students is also inherently an unethical and immoral institution. There should be no tolerance for abuse in higher education. We should be preparing the next generation to take over and run this world into a better future, not compound trauma many already have experienced.

    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    Amoshias
    wrote last edited by
    #39

    @jeffcodes @carrideen @futurebird At law School, I, then a thirty year old man, pursued, dated, and eventually married a 35-year-old professor. we have three beautiful children together.

    be careful of categoricals like there is no world.

    Jeff CodesJ 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • A Amoshias

      @jeffcodes @carrideen @futurebird At law School, I, then a thirty year old man, pursued, dated, and eventually married a 35-year-old professor. we have three beautiful children together.

      be careful of categoricals like there is no world.

      Jeff CodesJ This user is from outside of this forum
      Jeff CodesJ This user is from outside of this forum
      Jeff Codes
      wrote last edited by
      #40

      @Amoshias @carrideen @futurebird
      Running the world in a manner than caters to the exception leads to a lot of abuse.
      I am a licensed therapist. There are therapist out there who married former clients. I still would never say that allowing that categorically is safe and ethical.
      There is an inherent power structure and single-directional vulnerability at play. It should always remain unethical to have relationships with clients. I’ll gladly engage in a discussion of, “how long is long enough without contact or relationship to pursue and deeper relationship?”

      Jeff CodesJ Carrie ShanafeltC 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • Jeff CodesJ Jeff Codes

        @Amoshias @carrideen @futurebird
        Running the world in a manner than caters to the exception leads to a lot of abuse.
        I am a licensed therapist. There are therapist out there who married former clients. I still would never say that allowing that categorically is safe and ethical.
        There is an inherent power structure and single-directional vulnerability at play. It should always remain unethical to have relationships with clients. I’ll gladly engage in a discussion of, “how long is long enough without contact or relationship to pursue and deeper relationship?”

        Jeff CodesJ This user is from outside of this forum
        Jeff CodesJ This user is from outside of this forum
        Jeff Codes
        wrote last edited by
        #41

        @Amoshias @carrideen @futurebird
        My scenario is a bit of a flase equivalency example as the same emotional vulnerability does not exist between professor and student, or at least that isn’t an inherent part of.
        My example and comments still stand. Exceptions should not inform policy and practice.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Amoshias

          @jeffcodes @carrideen @futurebird At law School, I, then a thirty year old man, pursued, dated, and eventually married a 35-year-old professor. we have three beautiful children together.

          be careful of categoricals like there is no world.

          Jeff CodesJ This user is from outside of this forum
          Jeff CodesJ This user is from outside of this forum
          Jeff Codes
          wrote last edited by
          #42

          @Amoshias @carrideen @futurebird
          You were also both much older, and similar in age than many scenarios within an educational structure, and that matters too.
          I still stand by my statement that the inherent power structure makes the is unethical to start and exceptions should not define rules.
          Rules should always protect the most vulnerable.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Jeff CodesJ Jeff Codes

            @Amoshias @carrideen @futurebird
            Running the world in a manner than caters to the exception leads to a lot of abuse.
            I am a licensed therapist. There are therapist out there who married former clients. I still would never say that allowing that categorically is safe and ethical.
            There is an inherent power structure and single-directional vulnerability at play. It should always remain unethical to have relationships with clients. I’ll gladly engage in a discussion of, “how long is long enough without contact or relationship to pursue and deeper relationship?”

            Carrie ShanafeltC This user is from outside of this forum
            Carrie ShanafeltC This user is from outside of this forum
            Carrie Shanafelt
            wrote last edited by
            #43

            @jeffcodes @Amoshias @futurebird Yeah, I don't see how marriage is a desirable outcome for of academic mentorship, or therapy. If you marry your professor or therapist, someone has done their job badly! Even long after a student is no longer in my class, I have to write recommendation letters for them and mentor them in their decisions. You can't write recommendations for your spouse. Even if it's a happy marriage, it is certainly not good teaching.

            Jeff CodesJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Carrie ShanafeltC Carrie Shanafelt

              @jeffcodes @Amoshias @futurebird Yeah, I don't see how marriage is a desirable outcome for of academic mentorship, or therapy. If you marry your professor or therapist, someone has done their job badly! Even long after a student is no longer in my class, I have to write recommendation letters for them and mentor them in their decisions. You can't write recommendations for your spouse. Even if it's a happy marriage, it is certainly not good teaching.

              Jeff CodesJ This user is from outside of this forum
              Jeff CodesJ This user is from outside of this forum
              Jeff Codes
              wrote last edited by
              #44

              @carrideen @Amoshias @futurebird
              I would agree. For me, I could never, would never, have an outside romantic relationship with current or former clients.
              Even a casual friendship seems odd and rife with opportunity for abuse. Former clients toward therapist and expecting their ear, and therapist toward former client where the therapist may, even inadvertently, use their former vulnerabilities for the therapists own ends.
              The err is to be cautious. There are 8.5 billion people on this planet. You can find a companion that is not problematic of all times elsewhere.

              Carrie ShanafeltC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Jeff CodesJ Jeff Codes

                @carrideen @Amoshias @futurebird
                I would agree. For me, I could never, would never, have an outside romantic relationship with current or former clients.
                Even a casual friendship seems odd and rife with opportunity for abuse. Former clients toward therapist and expecting their ear, and therapist toward former client where the therapist may, even inadvertently, use their former vulnerabilities for the therapists own ends.
                The err is to be cautious. There are 8.5 billion people on this planet. You can find a companion that is not problematic of all times elsewhere.

                Carrie ShanafeltC This user is from outside of this forum
                Carrie ShanafeltC This user is from outside of this forum
                Carrie Shanafelt
                wrote last edited by
                #45

                @jeffcodes @Amoshias @futurebird I often reminded my colleagues who dated students, and claimed they just happen to be attracted to 20-year-olds, which is NOT A CRIME, that it's still bad pedagogy, and they would be more than welcome to date other 20yos. Oh no, they say, I need smart 20yos. OK, so date students at the college in the next town over. For some fascinating reason, those 20yos are not attracted to mediocre middle-aged academics. Just the ones in their classes.

                Jeff CodesJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Carrie ShanafeltC Carrie Shanafelt

                  @jeffcodes @Amoshias @futurebird I often reminded my colleagues who dated students, and claimed they just happen to be attracted to 20-year-olds, which is NOT A CRIME, that it's still bad pedagogy, and they would be more than welcome to date other 20yos. Oh no, they say, I need smart 20yos. OK, so date students at the college in the next town over. For some fascinating reason, those 20yos are not attracted to mediocre middle-aged academics. Just the ones in their classes.

                  Jeff CodesJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  Jeff CodesJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  Jeff Codes
                  wrote last edited by
                  #46

                  @carrideen @Amoshias @futurebird
                  Then the truth comes though. The power difference is part of the attraction. If that’s not glaringly obvious, you’re not really listening.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                    "barely legal" is a key word phrase from the porn industry used to describe 18 year olds. It's also tied to "virgin" porn. To some it is 'soft' immorality. "Boys will be boys." (Why are the boys all wealthy men over 50?)

                    The attraction of these products is in part about a naive inexperienced person (a virgin) being taken advantage of. But also how whatever is "off limits" becomes more attractive and mysterious.

                    But can we please stop and recognize how gross it all is? 1/

                    Weltschmerz à GogoT This user is from outside of this forum
                    Weltschmerz à GogoT This user is from outside of this forum
                    Weltschmerz à Gogo
                    wrote last edited by
                    #47

                    @futurebird

                    Any time I hear about "barely legal" porn or porn that advertises that the subject is "only 18" or something like that, I think about Chris Rock's joke about how a boss who only pays minimum wage is quietly saying "I'd pay you less if I could." It's really disturbing.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Mans RM Mans R

                      @futurebird @gbargoud > Edit: changed men to people.

                      I think framing it as a problem only among men can be harmful. Women like Ghislaine Maxwell are every bit as dangerous as any man, and talking about exploitation as something men do to women makes it easier for them to go unnoticed.

                      MarianneN This user is from outside of this forum
                      MarianneN This user is from outside of this forum
                      Marianne
                      wrote last edited by
                      #48

                      @futurebird @gbargoud @mansr except she is the only one in prison. These women rarely get to operate without men, because we live in a world of male hegemony and misogyny.
                      Yes women sometimes abuse. The vast majority of sexual violence is committed by men, against women and girls, however. Boys can also be victims.
                      But in this context we are talking about an overwhelmingly male abuser problem with overwhelmingly female victims. Let's not obscure that fact either.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups