Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "During covid" is a misleading name for "2020" or "the time with the regulations" or "the time when covid deaths were in the news a lot".

"During covid" is a misleading name for "2020" or "the time with the regulations" or "the time when covid deaths were in the news a lot".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
covidlanguage
14 Posts 12 Posters 17 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jennifer Moore 😷U Jennifer Moore 😷

    "During covid" is a misleading name for "2020" or "the time with the regulations" or "the time when covid deaths were in the news a lot".

    Now is "during covid" as well. "During covid" is still happening now.

    It went away from news media and government funding. It didn't go away from real life.

    Who profited from creating the impression that it's not worth worrying about any more?

    Who benefits from convincing us that the best outcome is "back to previous normal" with no upgrades or changes?

    #covid #language

    Renewable SexcellenceD This user is from outside of this forum
    Renewable SexcellenceD This user is from outside of this forum
    Renewable Sexcellence
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @unchartedworlds Especially since we know what works to protect people against COVID and other respiratory diseases - ventilation and filtration.

    Make ~5 Air Changes Per Hour mandatory in places where people mix and spend a lot of time together - schools, offices, pubs, restaurants - and COVID (and Long COVID) would become vanishingly rare.

    It's not expensive or difficult to do, and doesn't require people to change behaviour.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Jennifer Moore 😷U Jennifer Moore 😷

      "During covid" is a misleading name for "2020" or "the time with the regulations" or "the time when covid deaths were in the news a lot".

      Now is "during covid" as well. "During covid" is still happening now.

      It went away from news media and government funding. It didn't go away from real life.

      Who profited from creating the impression that it's not worth worrying about any more?

      Who benefits from convincing us that the best outcome is "back to previous normal" with no upgrades or changes?

      #covid #language

      KimK This user is from outside of this forum
      KimK This user is from outside of this forum
      Kim
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @unchartedworlds@scicomm.xyz I tend to use "back when people cared about COVID"

      David Mitchell :CApride:D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Jennifer Moore 😷U Jennifer Moore 😷

        "During covid" is a misleading name for "2020" or "the time with the regulations" or "the time when covid deaths were in the news a lot".

        Now is "during covid" as well. "During covid" is still happening now.

        It went away from news media and government funding. It didn't go away from real life.

        Who profited from creating the impression that it's not worth worrying about any more?

        Who benefits from convincing us that the best outcome is "back to previous normal" with no upgrades or changes?

        #covid #language

        Willow 🏳️‍⚧️🏴🇵🇸W This user is from outside of this forum
        Willow 🏳️‍⚧️🏴🇵🇸W This user is from outside of this forum
        Willow 🏳️‍⚧️🏴🇵🇸
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @unchartedworlds feels very much like this.

        Jennifer Moore 😷U 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Jennifer Moore 😷U Jennifer Moore 😷

          "During covid" is a misleading name for "2020" or "the time with the regulations" or "the time when covid deaths were in the news a lot".

          Now is "during covid" as well. "During covid" is still happening now.

          It went away from news media and government funding. It didn't go away from real life.

          Who profited from creating the impression that it's not worth worrying about any more?

          Who benefits from convincing us that the best outcome is "back to previous normal" with no upgrades or changes?

          #covid #language

          Matt HodgkinsonM This user is from outside of this forum
          Matt HodgkinsonM This user is from outside of this forum
          Matt Hodgkinson
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @unchartedworlds COVID is still with us, but there is a real distinction between the early pandemic and now. The excess mortality in the first and second waves was very high, but after widespread vaccination and exposure (and the deaths of the most vulnerable) the level of excess mortality is now equivalent to winter influenza peaks. Here's figures for European countries, 2020-2023:
          Nørgaard, S.K., Nielsen, J., Schjørring, C.B. et al. Excess mortality in Europe estimated by EuroMOMO during the COVID-19 pandemic and previous influenza seasons. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67981-1

          I wish people and governments took all respiratory illness more seriously, especially because of its long-term effects (I still mask in public when I can and I isolate when ill), but this does help explain why people see a difference between then and now. The level of illness and death is more "normal", even though normalising tens of thousands of deaths of flu - or COVID - a year is terrible.

          yoshY Jennifer Moore 😷U 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • Matt HodgkinsonM Matt Hodgkinson

            @unchartedworlds COVID is still with us, but there is a real distinction between the early pandemic and now. The excess mortality in the first and second waves was very high, but after widespread vaccination and exposure (and the deaths of the most vulnerable) the level of excess mortality is now equivalent to winter influenza peaks. Here's figures for European countries, 2020-2023:
            Nørgaard, S.K., Nielsen, J., Schjørring, C.B. et al. Excess mortality in Europe estimated by EuroMOMO during the COVID-19 pandemic and previous influenza seasons. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67981-1

            I wish people and governments took all respiratory illness more seriously, especially because of its long-term effects (I still mask in public when I can and I isolate when ill), but this does help explain why people see a difference between then and now. The level of illness and death is more "normal", even though normalising tens of thousands of deaths of flu - or COVID - a year is terrible.

            yoshY This user is from outside of this forum
            yoshY This user is from outside of this forum
            yosh
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @mattjhodgkinson @unchartedworlds

            Death is not the only measure worth considering, quality of life is right there as well. For example long covid has now overtaken asthma as the most common chronic illness in children:

            https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2834486

            Economics: record leave of absence was (very likely) responsible for Germany tipping into a recession in 2023: https://www.barrons.com/news/germany-s-economy-ails-as-sick-leave-hurts-output-087dcc0e

            And every covid infection does lasting damage to your body: https://www.panaccindex.info/p/what-covid-19-does-to-the-body-fifth

            viqV 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • Jennifer Moore 😷U Jennifer Moore 😷

              "During covid" is a misleading name for "2020" or "the time with the regulations" or "the time when covid deaths were in the news a lot".

              Now is "during covid" as well. "During covid" is still happening now.

              It went away from news media and government funding. It didn't go away from real life.

              Who profited from creating the impression that it's not worth worrying about any more?

              Who benefits from convincing us that the best outcome is "back to previous normal" with no upgrades or changes?

              #covid #language

              cognitively accessible mathG This user is from outside of this forum
              cognitively accessible mathG This user is from outside of this forum
              cognitively accessible math
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @unchartedworlds I say "During Covid Lockdown" or "when everybody was staying home because of Covid"

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Willow 🏳️‍⚧️🏴🇵🇸W Willow 🏳️‍⚧️🏴🇵🇸

                @unchartedworlds feels very much like this.

                Jennifer Moore 😷U This user is from outside of this forum
                Jennifer Moore 😷U This user is from outside of this forum
                Jennifer Moore 😷
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @whangdoodler

                Indeed!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • yoshY yosh

                  @mattjhodgkinson @unchartedworlds

                  Death is not the only measure worth considering, quality of life is right there as well. For example long covid has now overtaken asthma as the most common chronic illness in children:

                  https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2834486

                  Economics: record leave of absence was (very likely) responsible for Germany tipping into a recession in 2023: https://www.barrons.com/news/germany-s-economy-ails-as-sick-leave-hurts-output-087dcc0e

                  And every covid infection does lasting damage to your body: https://www.panaccindex.info/p/what-covid-19-does-to-the-body-fifth

                  viqV This user is from outside of this forum
                  viqV This user is from outside of this forum
                  viq
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @yosh
                  As a healthy teenager I got flu. I had high fever, but nothing remotely requiring hospitalisation. End of story? Nope. It gave me type 1 diabetes. I'll spare you bitching about how much effort and care and *money* goes into managing that. What I will say is that you can catch COVID much more easily, much more often, and each time has a much higher chance of leaving you with something even more interesting than diabetes.
                  @mattjhodgkinson @unchartedworlds

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • KimK Kim

                    @unchartedworlds@scicomm.xyz I tend to use "back when people cared about COVID"

                    David Mitchell :CApride:D This user is from outside of this forum
                    David Mitchell :CApride:D This user is from outside of this forum
                    David Mitchell :CApride:
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    @kim @unchartedworlds

                    I usually say some variation/combination of:

                    Early in the pandemic
                    At the height of restrictions/precautions
                    When most people were still <insert health precaution here>
                    occasionally something like: When people still managed risk
                    becoming more apropos recently: Before the government turned on us

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Matt HodgkinsonM Matt Hodgkinson

                      @unchartedworlds COVID is still with us, but there is a real distinction between the early pandemic and now. The excess mortality in the first and second waves was very high, but after widespread vaccination and exposure (and the deaths of the most vulnerable) the level of excess mortality is now equivalent to winter influenza peaks. Here's figures for European countries, 2020-2023:
                      Nørgaard, S.K., Nielsen, J., Schjørring, C.B. et al. Excess mortality in Europe estimated by EuroMOMO during the COVID-19 pandemic and previous influenza seasons. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67981-1

                      I wish people and governments took all respiratory illness more seriously, especially because of its long-term effects (I still mask in public when I can and I isolate when ill), but this does help explain why people see a difference between then and now. The level of illness and death is more "normal", even though normalising tens of thousands of deaths of flu - or COVID - a year is terrible.

                      Jennifer Moore 😷U This user is from outside of this forum
                      Jennifer Moore 😷U This user is from outside of this forum
                      Jennifer Moore 😷
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @mattjhodgkinson

                      Yes, it really is a different phase now, and I do think of the vaccine as a turning point. The diminishing level of deaths and acute emergencies when the vaccines arrived was significant - and overall a victory for science, even though the vaccines weren't perfect.

                      But as you say, there are "long-term effects" to consider as well, and that's where the pressures of cultural denial have been active. I'm not saying _you're_ intentionally playing it down, but to treat death rates as a good measure of covid's present-day significance is to inherit that framework. Measuring the incidence of Long Covid, or the common illnesses which covid makes more likely, or just "time off sick", would be more revealing of the ongoing current health burden.

                      (Thinking of it as a "respiratory illness" is arguably also congruent with a minimisation framework. I think it's more accurate to describe it as a systemic illness, caught via a respiratory route.)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Jennifer Moore 😷U Jennifer Moore 😷

                        "During covid" is a misleading name for "2020" or "the time with the regulations" or "the time when covid deaths were in the news a lot".

                        Now is "during covid" as well. "During covid" is still happening now.

                        It went away from news media and government funding. It didn't go away from real life.

                        Who profited from creating the impression that it's not worth worrying about any more?

                        Who benefits from convincing us that the best outcome is "back to previous normal" with no upgrades or changes?

                        #covid #language

                        The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                        The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                        The Doctor
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        @unchartedworlds Who didn't profit from it?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Jennifer Moore 😷U Jennifer Moore 😷

                          "During covid" is a misleading name for "2020" or "the time with the regulations" or "the time when covid deaths were in the news a lot".

                          Now is "during covid" as well. "During covid" is still happening now.

                          It went away from news media and government funding. It didn't go away from real life.

                          Who profited from creating the impression that it's not worth worrying about any more?

                          Who benefits from convincing us that the best outcome is "back to previous normal" with no upgrades or changes?

                          #covid #language

                          Ben Lubar (any pronouns)B This user is from outside of this forum
                          Ben Lubar (any pronouns)B This user is from outside of this forum
                          Ben Lubar (any pronouns)
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          @unchartedworlds this year is the seventh time it's been 2020 in a row

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R AodeRelay shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups