Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So let's assume, just for the sake of argument, that you were foolish enough to try to make a living by writing high-quality, well-researched, technical articles about Linux and free-software development.

So let's assume, just for the sake of argument, that you were foolish enough to try to make a living by writing high-quality, well-researched, technical articles about Linux and free-software development.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
4 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jonathan CorbetC This user is from outside of this forum
    Jonathan CorbetC This user is from outside of this forum
    Jonathan Corbet
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    So let's assume, just for the sake of argument, that you were foolish enough to try to make a living by writing high-quality, well-researched, technical articles about Linux and free-software development. I know that's crazy, but bear with me. In such a scenario, how does one succeed in a world increasingly full of stuff like this?

    https://www.webpronews.com/linux-7-0-looms-large-inside-the-landmark-kernel-release-that-could-reshape-open-source-computing/

    (I'll post no more links to that site, I promise).

    These folks appear to take the stuff we humans write, inject a bunch of errors, then slop it out to the world.

    If you were to engage in the silly quest described above, you would find that what you do is increasingly buried in the flood of this kind of material. Does anybody have any bright ideas about how one might survive in such an environment?
    Justin DerrickJ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
    • Jonathan CorbetC Jonathan Corbet
      So let's assume, just for the sake of argument, that you were foolish enough to try to make a living by writing high-quality, well-researched, technical articles about Linux and free-software development. I know that's crazy, but bear with me. In such a scenario, how does one succeed in a world increasingly full of stuff like this?

      https://www.webpronews.com/linux-7-0-looms-large-inside-the-landmark-kernel-release-that-could-reshape-open-source-computing/

      (I'll post no more links to that site, I promise).

      These folks appear to take the stuff we humans write, inject a bunch of errors, then slop it out to the world.

      If you were to engage in the silly quest described above, you would find that what you do is increasingly buried in the flood of this kind of material. Does anybody have any bright ideas about how one might survive in such an environment?
      Justin DerrickJ This user is from outside of this forum
      Justin DerrickJ This user is from outside of this forum
      Justin Derrick
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @corbet Don't post links to the slop? Post links to your original writing instead?

      Jonathan CorbetC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Justin DerrickJ Justin Derrick

        @corbet Don't post links to the slop? Post links to your original writing instead?

        Jonathan CorbetC This user is from outside of this forum
        Jonathan CorbetC This user is from outside of this forum
        Jonathan Corbet
        wrote last edited by
        #3
        @JustinDerrick Good advice but inadequate. We do definitely operate that way most of the time; here I thought it was important to call out what is going on.

        But if I search Google for "Linux 7.0", I see that two out of seven of the "top stories" are from that site, including the one I posted. This stuff is being strongly amplified in ways that we're not well placed to counter.
        Alison ChaikenA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Jonathan CorbetC Jonathan Corbet
          @JustinDerrick Good advice but inadequate. We do definitely operate that way most of the time; here I thought it was important to call out what is going on.

          But if I search Google for "Linux 7.0", I see that two out of seven of the "top stories" are from that site, including the one I posted. This stuff is being strongly amplified in ways that we're not well placed to counter.
          Alison ChaikenA This user is from outside of this forum
          Alison ChaikenA This user is from outside of this forum
          Alison Chaiken
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @corbet @JustinDerrick DuckDuckGo does not show that website, but MSN (!) is near the top. To me, the awfulness under discussion is a small part of the wider problem of where people seek information. Using Google Search is bad, but at least it's not social media.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups