Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I'm curious, now that Mastodon is better at loading missing replies, have you noticed a decrease in mansplaining?

I'm curious, now that Mastodon is better at loading missing replies, have you noticed a decrease in mansplaining?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
fediversepollsocialmediamansplaining
43 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Stefan BohacekS Stefan Bohacek

    I'm curious, now that Mastodon is better at loading missing replies, have you noticed a decrease in mansplaining?

    #fediverse #poll #SocialMedia #mansplaining

    Peter Koopman 🦣P This user is from outside of this forum
    Peter Koopman 🦣P This user is from outside of this forum
    Peter Koopman 🦣
    wrote last edited by
    #27

    As a typical male I don't know if I'm sufficiently equipped to detect mansplaining. So, not sure.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Watchful CitizenW Watchful Citizen

      @stefan I'm sorry for anyone that's been patronized because of their gender. Condescension based on assumptions is wrong.

      My understanding is that mansplaining is explaining because you assume a woman doesn't know something. I don't dispute that happens.

      What frustrates me though is the double standard I keep seeing. For example if I see someone writing something I don't agree with I tend to over explain. Not because of any gender but because I have opinions and want to ensure I explain what I mean. That's just how I communicate with everyone.

      But I've watched the term get used here as a catch-all for any time a man disagrees with or corrects a woman. Sometimes warranted, sometimes not. And it builds this fear of even participating in discussions with women because your reasoning gets ignored in favor of assumed sexist intent.

      If we're assuming someone's motivation based on their gender without evidence, how is that different from the problem we're trying to solve?

      Let's put a stop to sexism. On both sides.

      Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
      Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
      Stefan Bohacek
      wrote last edited by
      #28

      @watchfulcitizen Yeah, the term does sometimes get used as a shorthand for different kinds of unsolicited replies.

      And I do agree that social situations can get a bit tricky to navigate, especially online.

      At the same time, when we see a complete stranger get something wrong on the internet, do we need to let them know? Maybe if it's a life-threatening misinformation, sure.

      I for one have had a much better experience myself after I realized that it's fine to let people be wrong sometimes.

      Watchful CitizenW 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Stefan BohacekS Stefan Bohacek

        I'm curious, now that Mastodon is better at loading missing replies, have you noticed a decrease in mansplaining?

        #fediverse #poll #SocialMedia #mansplaining

        Wendizen 🇺🇦W This user is from outside of this forum
        Wendizen 🇺🇦W This user is from outside of this forum
        Wendizen 🇺🇦
        wrote last edited by
        #29

        @stefan I have little patience for dickwads so I block when needed. Meanwhile, not noticing any changes.

        Stefan BohacekS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Wendizen 🇺🇦W Wendizen 🇺🇦

          @stefan I have little patience for dickwads so I block when needed. Meanwhile, not noticing any changes.

          Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
          Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
          Stefan Bohacek
          wrote last edited by
          #30

          @wendinoakland Ah, sorry you have to deal with that!

          Wendizen 🇺🇦W 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Stefan BohacekS Stefan Bohacek

            @wendinoakland Ah, sorry you have to deal with that!

            Wendizen 🇺🇦W This user is from outside of this forum
            Wendizen 🇺🇦W This user is from outside of this forum
            Wendizen 🇺🇦
            wrote last edited by
            #31

            @stefan It’s a regular feature of “being female on the internet”. See: “Men Explain Things to Me” (Rebecca Solnit)

            Stefan BohacekS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Stefan BohacekS Stefan Bohacek

              @watchfulcitizen Yeah, the term does sometimes get used as a shorthand for different kinds of unsolicited replies.

              And I do agree that social situations can get a bit tricky to navigate, especially online.

              At the same time, when we see a complete stranger get something wrong on the internet, do we need to let them know? Maybe if it's a life-threatening misinformation, sure.

              I for one have had a much better experience myself after I realized that it's fine to let people be wrong sometimes.

              Watchful CitizenW This user is from outside of this forum
              Watchful CitizenW This user is from outside of this forum
              Watchful Citizen
              wrote last edited by
              #32

              @stefan Fair point about picking battles. I could be better at that.

              My concern is when offering a perspective or disagreeing gets dismissed based on gender assumptions rather than content or tone. If cross-gender discussion becomes something to avoid because of that risk, we end up with less dialogue, not more equality.

              Maybe the answer is judging behavior on its own merits instead of who's involved?

              Stefan BohacekS 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • Watchful CitizenW Watchful Citizen

                @stefan Fair point about picking battles. I could be better at that.

                My concern is when offering a perspective or disagreeing gets dismissed based on gender assumptions rather than content or tone. If cross-gender discussion becomes something to avoid because of that risk, we end up with less dialogue, not more equality.

                Maybe the answer is judging behavior on its own merits instead of who's involved?

                Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
                Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
                Stefan Bohacek
                wrote last edited by
                #33

                @watchfulcitizen Yeah, you're not wrong, but also, trying to look at things from the perspective of someone who often deals with men jumping into their mentions thinking they're being helpful when they're not, I can see them not having a ton of patience left.

                Watchful CitizenW 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Wendizen 🇺🇦W Wendizen 🇺🇦

                  @stefan It’s a regular feature of “being female on the internet”. See: “Men Explain Things to Me” (Rebecca Solnit)

                  Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
                  Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
                  Stefan Bohacek
                  wrote last edited by
                  #34

                  @wendinoakland Well, I definitely appreciate your, and other marginalized people's resilience and patience!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Stefan BohacekS Stefan Bohacek

                    @watchfulcitizen Yeah, you're not wrong, but also, trying to look at things from the perspective of someone who often deals with men jumping into their mentions thinking they're being helpful when they're not, I can see them not having a ton of patience left.

                    Watchful CitizenW This user is from outside of this forum
                    Watchful CitizenW This user is from outside of this forum
                    Watchful Citizen
                    wrote last edited by
                    #35

                    @stefan I hear you about the patience, I can imagine it must be exhausting.

                    But I'm stuck on this. If we're fighting gender assumptions, why name the problem after a gender? That shifts who gets assumed about.

                    Maybe I'm missing something. But judging by gender instead of behavior seems like what we're trying to stop, not redirect.

                    Stefan BohacekS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Watchful CitizenW Watchful Citizen

                      @stefan I hear you about the patience, I can imagine it must be exhausting.

                      But I'm stuck on this. If we're fighting gender assumptions, why name the problem after a gender? That shifts who gets assumed about.

                      Maybe I'm missing something. But judging by gender instead of behavior seems like what we're trying to stop, not redirect.

                      Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
                      Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
                      Stefan Bohacek
                      wrote last edited by
                      #36

                      @watchfulcitizen Because it is a uniquely male problem.

                      Yes, of course, not all men, and all that, but I'm personally not offended, I know it doesn't apply to me (or at least I hope so!) and it is a reminder that it is up to us men to hold each other responsible and call out bad behavior.

                      Best way to get rid of the term is to help eradicate the behavior.

                      Watchful CitizenW 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Stefan BohacekS Stefan Bohacek

                        @watchfulcitizen Because it is a uniquely male problem.

                        Yes, of course, not all men, and all that, but I'm personally not offended, I know it doesn't apply to me (or at least I hope so!) and it is a reminder that it is up to us men to hold each other responsible and call out bad behavior.

                        Best way to get rid of the term is to help eradicate the behavior.

                        Watchful CitizenW This user is from outside of this forum
                        Watchful CitizenW This user is from outside of this forum
                        Watchful Citizen
                        wrote last edited by
                        #37

                        @stefan I agree, mostly a male pattern and we should call it out and fix it.

                        But generalizing by gender pushes us who don't do it into defensiveness. Humans dig in when grouped with behavior they don't do.

                        Expecting men to correct sexist behavior by being sexist towards them seems backwards.

                        I just think the term itself is what bothers me

                        Stefan BohacekS 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • Watchful CitizenW Watchful Citizen

                          @stefan I agree, mostly a male pattern and we should call it out and fix it.

                          But generalizing by gender pushes us who don't do it into defensiveness. Humans dig in when grouped with behavior they don't do.

                          Expecting men to correct sexist behavior by being sexist towards them seems backwards.

                          I just think the term itself is what bothers me

                          Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
                          Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
                          Stefan Bohacek
                          wrote last edited by
                          #38

                          @watchfulcitizen Well, I see that I won't be able to change your mind, so as the last thing I'll add, I'll just reiterate, almost nobody thinks that literally all men are mansplainers, all of the time, so trying to argue that point is kind of a waste of time.

                          The term has already caught on, and while there might be more gender-neutral alternatives, I don't know, I mean you're free to try to use them, see if they catch on. You never know!

                          JonJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Stefan BohacekS Stefan Bohacek

                            I'm curious, now that Mastodon is better at loading missing replies, have you noticed a decrease in mansplaining?

                            #fediverse #poll #SocialMedia #mansplaining

                            chris martensC This user is from outside of this forum
                            chris martensC This user is from outside of this forum
                            chris martens
                            wrote last edited by
                            #39

                            @stefan it *definitely* decreases the amount of replies saying (basically) the same thing. i would not call previous instances of that mansplaining, though, because the repliers could do everything in their power to check that they weren’t duplicating someone else’s reply and still wind up doing so. i’m not sure whether you mean to include this phenomenon in your poll.

                            chris martensC Stefan BohacekS 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • chris martensC chris martens

                              @stefan it *definitely* decreases the amount of replies saying (basically) the same thing. i would not call previous instances of that mansplaining, though, because the repliers could do everything in their power to check that they weren’t duplicating someone else’s reply and still wind up doing so. i’m not sure whether you mean to include this phenomenon in your poll.

                              chris martensC This user is from outside of this forum
                              chris martensC This user is from outside of this forum
                              chris martens
                              wrote last edited by
                              #40

                              @stefan ironically, i am only belatedly realizing that others have already replied to you with more or less the same confusion 🙂

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • chris martensC chris martens

                                @stefan it *definitely* decreases the amount of replies saying (basically) the same thing. i would not call previous instances of that mansplaining, though, because the repliers could do everything in their power to check that they weren’t duplicating someone else’s reply and still wind up doing so. i’m not sure whether you mean to include this phenomenon in your poll.

                                Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
                                Stefan BohacekS This user is from outside of this forum
                                Stefan Bohacek
                                wrote last edited by
                                #41

                                @chrisamaphone I was specifically thinking about mansplaining when I posted this, I think it would be good to do a proper study on the full impact of this feature. Looking at the results and the replies, I'm guessing it helps reduce the amount of duplicate replies, but people who are dead set on having their voice heard just don't care all that much.

                                (The poll was boosted by a few Mastodon folks, so maybe this will at least get the conversation started!)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Stefan BohacekS Stefan Bohacek

                                  @watchfulcitizen Well, I see that I won't be able to change your mind, so as the last thing I'll add, I'll just reiterate, almost nobody thinks that literally all men are mansplainers, all of the time, so trying to argue that point is kind of a waste of time.

                                  The term has already caught on, and while there might be more gender-neutral alternatives, I don't know, I mean you're free to try to use them, see if they catch on. You never know!

                                  JonJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  JonJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Jon
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #42

                                  Good discussion. @watchfulcitizen, a couple of thoughts ... online communications are hard and so it's easy for something to come across as mansplaining even if it isn't intended that way. I'm prone to it myself! So I've made a point to notice what in my style comes across that way, and tried to modify my style. I'm still far from perfect but there does seem to be noticeable improvement. In your case it sounds like you've noticed that it's often linked to overexplaining ... so, doing less of that could be helpful.

                                  In terms of the term "pushing you into defensiveness", it's really more that you are reacting defensively. So don't! It's on you, not on the people using the term.

                                  And the goal of labeling something as mansplaining isn't to fight gender assumptions. It's two-fold: to get guys to be aware of the issue and do less of it (or intervene when they see others doing it), and to reassure women who are the targets of mansplaining know that it's not just them -- it's a common enough phenomenon that it even has a name.

                                  @stefan

                                  Watchful CitizenW 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • JonJ Jon

                                    Good discussion. @watchfulcitizen, a couple of thoughts ... online communications are hard and so it's easy for something to come across as mansplaining even if it isn't intended that way. I'm prone to it myself! So I've made a point to notice what in my style comes across that way, and tried to modify my style. I'm still far from perfect but there does seem to be noticeable improvement. In your case it sounds like you've noticed that it's often linked to overexplaining ... so, doing less of that could be helpful.

                                    In terms of the term "pushing you into defensiveness", it's really more that you are reacting defensively. So don't! It's on you, not on the people using the term.

                                    And the goal of labeling something as mansplaining isn't to fight gender assumptions. It's two-fold: to get guys to be aware of the issue and do less of it (or intervene when they see others doing it), and to reassure women who are the targets of mansplaining know that it's not just them -- it's a common enough phenomenon that it even has a name.

                                    @stefan

                                    Watchful CitizenW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Watchful CitizenW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Watchful Citizen
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #43

                                    @jdp23 @stefan valid points! Its not that I personaly feel attacked. I try to overexplain less to avoid "mansplaining". The thing I want to dispute isnt really that mansplaining is bad. It is. I want a society that is kind and understanding no matter the gender.

                                    The reason I started the discussion was because I myself can feel the urge to just not voice my opinions when its a woman. Because if the risk of being called mansplaining. And that to me feels like a step towards the wrong direction.

                                    I don't know if its my autism causing me to overexplain or having a strong sence of justice for the double standard. I think we all should just work to make everyone feel included.

                                    Discussions are complex as it is. I'm sure there is tons of perspectives I'm missing and I'll love to hear them. I'm even sure that my POV in this thread will be misunderstood.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups