Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Talking about election security would be a lot more productive if more people understood two things:

Talking about election security would be a lot more productive if more people understood two things:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
4 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Matt BlazeM This user is from outside of this forum
    Matt BlazeM This user is from outside of this forum
    Matt Blaze
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Talking about election security would be a lot more productive if more people understood two things:

    - The existence of a vulnerability is concerning, but does not by itself prove that an election was hacked or compromised.

    - Losing an election, even one that you expected to win, is frustrating, but does not by itself prove that an election was hacked or compromised.

    rag. Gustavino BevilacquaG JimTheWhyGuy βŒπŸ‘‘J Don Hawkins - W7DAHD 3 Replies Last reply
    2
    0
    • Matt BlazeM Matt Blaze

      Talking about election security would be a lot more productive if more people understood two things:

      - The existence of a vulnerability is concerning, but does not by itself prove that an election was hacked or compromised.

      - Losing an election, even one that you expected to win, is frustrating, but does not by itself prove that an election was hacked or compromised.

      rag. Gustavino BevilacquaG This user is from outside of this forum
      rag. Gustavino BevilacquaG This user is from outside of this forum
      rag. Gustavino Bevilacqua
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @mattblaze

      I've been an election scrutineer many times, and I invite dubious people to make the same, to see how really thing work.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
      • Matt BlazeM Matt Blaze

        Talking about election security would be a lot more productive if more people understood two things:

        - The existence of a vulnerability is concerning, but does not by itself prove that an election was hacked or compromised.

        - Losing an election, even one that you expected to win, is frustrating, but does not by itself prove that an election was hacked or compromised.

        JimTheWhyGuy βŒπŸ‘‘J This user is from outside of this forum
        JimTheWhyGuy βŒπŸ‘‘J This user is from outside of this forum
        JimTheWhyGuy βŒπŸ‘‘
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @mattblaze My wife and I are both IL election judges. We get extensive training on exacting procedures for registering new voters, verifying register voters, and helping anyone who wants to vote to vote on Election Day.

        We are also trained on every aspect of the equipment at our precincts. I've even deployed and shut down an entire precinct's polling station via detailed checklists.

        If the public knew all the planning and security that goes into securing their votes, their heads would explode.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • R AodeRelay shared this topic
        • Matt BlazeM Matt Blaze

          Talking about election security would be a lot more productive if more people understood two things:

          - The existence of a vulnerability is concerning, but does not by itself prove that an election was hacked or compromised.

          - Losing an election, even one that you expected to win, is frustrating, but does not by itself prove that an election was hacked or compromised.

          Don Hawkins - W7DAHD This user is from outside of this forum
          Don Hawkins - W7DAHD This user is from outside of this forum
          Don Hawkins - W7DAH
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @mattblaze @WideEyedCurious Operative words: β€œdoes not by itself”.

          The Court of Public Opinion can be more powerful than SCOTUS, too.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups