Nina Burleigh and Katie Chenoweth have a valuable report today about Roger Sollenberger's recent discovery of material in the Epstein files that directly implicates Trump in sexual assault deserves attention.
-
Nina Burleigh and Katie Chenoweth have a valuable report today about Roger Sollenberger's recent discovery of material in the Epstein files that directly implicates Trump in sexual assault deserves attention. It's dense and difficulty to condense into a few excerpts, so I'm going to cite it at length in this thread:
"Earlier this week, journalist Roger Sollenberger published a piece examining evidence the FBI appears to have concealed involving Trump. It centers on a July 2019 interview with a woman who claimed to the FBI that she met Epstein in South Carolina in 1983 or 1984, when she was 13 years old. According to her account, Epstein tricked her into showing up at his vacation rental by claiming to need a babysitter."
-
"Earlier this week, journalist Roger Sollenberger published a piece examining evidence the FBI appears to have concealed involving Trump. It centers on a July 2019 interview with a woman who claimed to the FBI that she met Epstein in South Carolina in 1983 or 1984, when she was 13 years old. According to her account, Epstein tricked her into showing up at his vacation rental by claiming to need a babysitter."
"There were, in fact, no children. Instead, she says, he drugged her, took nude pictures, and raped her.
So far, another revolting Epstein story.
But this one scales up.
The redacted victim in that interview has biographical details that closely match those of another redacted-name woman."
-
"There were, in fact, no children. Instead, she says, he drugged her, took nude pictures, and raped her.
So far, another revolting Epstein story.
But this one scales up.
The redacted victim in that interview has biographical details that closely match those of another redacted-name woman."
"In separate documents within the Epstein files and in a court filing, that woman alleged that Epstein took her to New York and exposed her to 'wealthy older men' as 'fresh meat.' She further claimed that he introduced her to a man – Trump – who sexually assaulted and 'punched her in the head.' ...
This particular accusation, however, invites a closer look from members of Congress who have access to the unredacted Epstein material."
-
"In separate documents within the Epstein files and in a court filing, that woman alleged that Epstein took her to New York and exposed her to 'wealthy older men' as 'fresh meat.' She further claimed that he introduced her to a man – Trump – who sexually assaulted and 'punched her in the head.' ...
This particular accusation, however, invites a closer look from members of Congress who have access to the unredacted Epstein material."
"Here’s why:
It appears that the FBI interviewed this woman four times over a period of a few weeks in the summer of 2019. But only one of the four interviews is in the released files.
The agents clearly believed the woman had something to fear. Her name is always redacted but followed by the words in all caps: SOURCE. This designation is nowhere else in the Epstein files."
-
"Here’s why:
It appears that the FBI interviewed this woman four times over a period of a few weeks in the summer of 2019. But only one of the four interviews is in the released files.
The agents clearly believed the woman had something to fear. Her name is always redacted but followed by the words in all caps: SOURCE. This designation is nowhere else in the Epstein files."
"An FBI source we spoke with told us it is typically used for high-risk informants such as mafia rats.
In the single interview included in the release, the woman showed FBI agents a photo of Epstein and Trump on her phone. She then asked if she could crop out the second person."
-
"An FBI source we spoke with told us it is typically used for high-risk informants such as mafia rats.
In the single interview included in the release, the woman showed FBI agents a photo of Epstein and Trump on her phone. She then asked if she could crop out the second person."
"When agents asked about the second man, her lawyer intervened, stating that '[REDACTED] was concerned about implicating additional individuals, and specifically any that were well known, due to fear of retaliation.'
In an October 2019 call between the FBI and her attorney, also logged by the FBI, the attorney referenced 'information regarding any investigation into a recent suspicious incident that occurred at [redacted] place of employment.'”
-
"When agents asked about the second man, her lawyer intervened, stating that '[REDACTED] was concerned about implicating additional individuals, and specifically any that were well known, due to fear of retaliation.'
In an October 2019 call between the FBI and her attorney, also logged by the FBI, the attorney referenced 'information regarding any investigation into a recent suspicious incident that occurred at [redacted] place of employment.'”
"Mentions of 'suspicious incidents' confronting Trump accusers at work remind us of Stormy Daniels’ account of the creepy thug who threatened her and her baby daughter in a Vegas parking lot when she was preparing to go public about her tryst with Donald).
The DOJ appears to have gone to great lengths to hide the fact that they removed pages of interaction with the woman."
-
"Mentions of 'suspicious incidents' confronting Trump accusers at work remind us of Stormy Daniels’ account of the creepy thug who threatened her and her baby daughter in a Vegas parking lot when she was preparing to go public about her tryst with Donald).
The DOJ appears to have gone to great lengths to hide the fact that they removed pages of interaction with the woman."
"The released Epstein files use a secondary numbering system that appears sequential, but in this case conceals significant gaps in the primary record. The woman’s first interview with the FBI, labeled 'Interview One,' begins at serial -001. In the released files, the documents then jump to -008, -009, and -010 for a series of photos that include one of Epstein and Trump, with Trump cropped out, followed by images of the accuser as a teenager with friends."
-
"The released Epstein files use a secondary numbering system that appears sequential, but in this case conceals significant gaps in the primary record. The woman’s first interview with the FBI, labeled 'Interview One,' begins at serial -001. In the released files, the documents then jump to -008, -009, and -010 for a series of photos that include one of Epstein and Trump, with Trump cropped out, followed by images of the accuser as a teenager with friends."
"Three numbered records then appear relating to her initial FBI phone interview and two contacts with the Bloom firm. The six missing items of evidence could be images or text. If they are text, they could amount to many more pages in total, as the first interview runs nine pages long.
In one undated document that appears to be what the FBI calls a case index, there are five PROTECT SOURCE interviews listed, clearly with the same woman."
-
"Three numbered records then appear relating to her initial FBI phone interview and two contacts with the Bloom firm. The six missing items of evidence could be images or text. If they are text, they could amount to many more pages in total, as the first interview runs nine pages long.
In one undated document that appears to be what the FBI calls a case index, there are five PROTECT SOURCE interviews listed, clearly with the same woman."
"We only have two of them. Where are serials 252, 264 and 312 – corresponding to Interviews 2,3, and 4?
There is another tell. The one interview we have is titled 'Interview One.' The standard FBI practice throughout the Epstein files is to title interviews 'Interview of [person]' — unless there are multiple interviews, in which case they are numbered."
-
"We only have two of them. Where are serials 252, 264 and 312 – corresponding to Interviews 2,3, and 4?
There is another tell. The one interview we have is titled 'Interview One.' The standard FBI practice throughout the Epstein files is to title interviews 'Interview of [person]' — unless there are multiple interviews, in which case they are numbered."
"We know this woman’s report concerned the DOJ because in July 2025, as the Department was facing calls to release the files, an internal email placed Trump at the top of a list of accused individuals on a PowerPoint presentation. His name was highlighted in yellow for 'salacious' accusations, alongside Leon Black, Les Wexner, and others."
-
"We know this woman’s report concerned the DOJ because in July 2025, as the Department was facing calls to release the files, an internal email placed Trump at the top of a list of accused individuals on a PowerPoint presentation. His name was highlighted in yellow for 'salacious' accusations, alongside Leon Black, Les Wexner, and others."
"Because of that email and an FBI powerpoint also in the files, we know that a search for Donald Trump’s name in July 2025 returned 'a positive case hit' in FBI lingo. This email implies it was documented in an attached spreadsheet which is not in the files now."
-
R ActivityRelay shared this topic
