Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Be suspicious of anyone who tells you that "Me Too failed."

Be suspicious of anyone who tells you that "Me Too failed."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
28 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ArtemisA Artemis

    I may be working with a different definition of Me Too than some folks, so let me clarify.

    We had a cultural moment where big public conversations were had around the nature of sexual abuse, victim blaming, abuse culture, & the ways people get away with it.

    It wasn't just some people using a hashtag. It was this outpouring of people's rage at their own abuse, horror at the things they were learning, & developing new standards & expectations about people's behavior.

    ArtemisA This user is from outside of this forum
    ArtemisA This user is from outside of this forum
    Artemis
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    And as much as the MAGAs in the group would like to deny it, without Me Too, I don't think the backlash against Epstein we see now would be happening.

    ArtemisA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ArtemisA Artemis

      @PedestrianError
      To me, it's a lot more than a hashtag or online phenomenon. It was a massive public conversation about sexual abuse & misogyny in a way we as a society had never had before.

      PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P This user is from outside of this forum
      PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P This user is from outside of this forum
      PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      @artemis I'm not saying that's what it is, just that the phrase "#MeToo movement" has been used to trivialize what happened, erasing years of Tarana Burke's work before white women adopted the hashtag and minimizing the relevance of what was shared. I didn't experience the 2017 public discourse as different in content from conversations I knew had been going on since well before I was born, just different in scale because the dynamics of social media facilitated rapid spread.

      PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P ArtemisA 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • john.brown_typefaceJ john.brown_typeface

        @artemis
        same as with BLM

        Black people and others believed that Black Lives Matter before there was a hashtag. there were movements that were motivated by that belief that pre-date the hashtag, the official orgs, or the internet

        the fight against white supremacy isn't limited to BLM and the online aspects or even those orgs don't determine whether the fight is won or lost

        ArtemisA This user is from outside of this forum
        ArtemisA This user is from outside of this forum
        Artemis
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        @johnbrowntypeface
        Sure, but I'm talking about cultural moments, & those are specific to time & place.

        The fight against oppression has been going on since time immemorial, of course, & I don't think I've said anything which would contradict that. I'm interested here in one of the many mechanisms of social/cultural change.

        john.brown_typefaceJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:

          @artemis I'm not saying that's what it is, just that the phrase "#MeToo movement" has been used to trivialize what happened, erasing years of Tarana Burke's work before white women adopted the hashtag and minimizing the relevance of what was shared. I didn't experience the 2017 public discourse as different in content from conversations I knew had been going on since well before I was born, just different in scale because the dynamics of social media facilitated rapid spread.

          PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P This user is from outside of this forum
          PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P This user is from outside of this forum
          PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @artemis I find it quite disturbing how the phrase "a MeToo problem" has been adopted by male supremacists to trivialize sexual harassment and assault allegations and failures of leaders to ensure safe environments in their workplaces. For example, a politician being described as having "a MeToo problem" because he covered for a senior male aide who had been sexually harassing multiple staffers in his campaign &/or administration.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ArtemisA Artemis

            @johnbrowntypeface
            Sure, but I'm talking about cultural moments, & those are specific to time & place.

            The fight against oppression has been going on since time immemorial, of course, & I don't think I've said anything which would contradict that. I'm interested here in one of the many mechanisms of social/cultural change.

            john.brown_typefaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
            john.brown_typefaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
            john.brown_typeface
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @artemis

            for me it's hard to separate or differentiate between what is cultural vs social vs political.

            if someone spoke out against abuse the year before MeToo, is that part of MeToo? if someone else tries to hold someone accountable for abuse in 2026 but doesn't associate it with MeToo, is it still MeToo?

            i'm not discounting it as a cultural movement, just saying it's involved with existing things like feminism and anti-authoritarianism.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:

              @artemis I'm not saying that's what it is, just that the phrase "#MeToo movement" has been used to trivialize what happened, erasing years of Tarana Burke's work before white women adopted the hashtag and minimizing the relevance of what was shared. I didn't experience the 2017 public discourse as different in content from conversations I knew had been going on since well before I was born, just different in scale because the dynamics of social media facilitated rapid spread.

              ArtemisA This user is from outside of this forum
              ArtemisA This user is from outside of this forum
              Artemis
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @PedestrianError
              I guess I'm not really sure how this relates.

              Are you saying we should use a different term than "Me Too" for that cultural moment? I'm trying to talk about the impact of those conversations happening with a broader audience.

              I said they were conversations that we as a broader society hadn't had publicly, not that it was brand new or that the work wasn't already being done. I'm talking about the change of social/cultural attitudes, not new information being discovered.

              ArtemisA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ArtemisA Artemis

                @PedestrianError
                I guess I'm not really sure how this relates.

                Are you saying we should use a different term than "Me Too" for that cultural moment? I'm trying to talk about the impact of those conversations happening with a broader audience.

                I said they were conversations that we as a broader society hadn't had publicly, not that it was brand new or that the work wasn't already being done. I'm talking about the change of social/cultural attitudes, not new information being discovered.

                ArtemisA This user is from outside of this forum
                ArtemisA This user is from outside of this forum
                Artemis
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @PedestrianError
                Like, I'm just not sure what the insight is you are offering here. Is it the term? Do you not think that was a significant moment of cultural change? I don't think I follow.

                PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ArtemisA Artemis

                  @PedestrianError
                  Like, I'm just not sure what the insight is you are offering here. Is it the term? Do you not think that was a significant moment of cultural change? I don't think I follow.

                  PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P This user is from outside of this forum
                  PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P This user is from outside of this forum
                  PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @artemis I'm saying that in a way the phrase "me too" has been captured in the backlash and used to trivialize the underlying conversation. Not sure how better to explain it other than when you hear certain men discuss "me too" in verbal conversation, there's quite a dismissive tone to their voice that makes clear the whole conversation is being trivialized as just a silly little women's trend. I don't know how to better describe it, but I think some defense/careful use of the phrase is needed.

                  ArtemisA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:

                    @artemis I'm saying that in a way the phrase "me too" has been captured in the backlash and used to trivialize the underlying conversation. Not sure how better to explain it other than when you hear certain men discuss "me too" in verbal conversation, there's quite a dismissive tone to their voice that makes clear the whole conversation is being trivialized as just a silly little women's trend. I don't know how to better describe it, but I think some defense/careful use of the phrase is needed.

                    ArtemisA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ArtemisA This user is from outside of this forum
                    Artemis
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @PedestrianError
                    Ok, I think that did help me understand. Thank you for the clarification! And that is a point worthy of consideration.

                    PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ArtemisA Artemis

                      @PedestrianError
                      Ok, I think that did help me understand. Thank you for the clarification! And that is a point worthy of consideration.

                      PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P This user is from outside of this forum
                      PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P This user is from outside of this forum
                      PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @artemis The issue of a powerful man allegedly having a me too problem instead of a sexual harassment problem, a misogyny problem, a workplace discrimination problem, etc really gets to me. It redirects the attention to the targets of the behavior for having dared speak about it and potentially harmed an otherwise promising man's career rather than him for having behaved badly or failed to control his male employees' bad behavior.

                      john.brown_typefaceJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:P PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:

                        @artemis The issue of a powerful man allegedly having a me too problem instead of a sexual harassment problem, a misogyny problem, a workplace discrimination problem, etc really gets to me. It redirects the attention to the targets of the behavior for having dared speak about it and potentially harmed an otherwise promising man's career rather than him for having behaved badly or failed to control his male employees' bad behavior.

                        john.brown_typefaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        john.brown_typefaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        john.brown_typeface
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @PedestrianError @artemis
                        yeah there's definitely something to how giving something it's own name and hashtag captures the meaning in some way.

                        i was trying to refer to that with my comments

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ArtemisA Artemis

                          They would HATE to imagine that they were influenced by it. They would refuse to admit they've given any ground, of course, but...I just don't think without that earlier big explosion over the abuse of women & girls that any of this "release the Epstein files" shit would ever have happened. A lot of people see this shit differently than they used to, including quite a few people who would vehemently deny that they ever changed or budged an inch.

                          meta physical deflationistG This user is from outside of this forum
                          meta physical deflationistG This user is from outside of this forum
                          meta physical deflationist
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          @artemis while i agree that calling those things a complete failure is not helping, i do not agree that we should stop thinking of material and social change as the goal.
                          we need to get used to having tiered goals. where some are achievable and those level up to ones we might never get

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ArtemisA Artemis

                            I think "Me Too failed" is a convenient narrative for powerful people. It makes us feel like no matter how hard we rattle our chains, nothing changes.

                            But what we need to make change is people who are in solidarity with one another. If something increases our ability to stand together against oppression, that increases our odds.

                            Me Too didn't topple power structures. It couldn't have. That's not how that fucking works.

                            That doesn't make it a failure.

                            su_liamS This user is from outside of this forum
                            su_liamS This user is from outside of this forum
                            su_liam
                            wrote last edited by
                            #27

                            @artemis If it weren’t for BLM, Derek Chauvin and Amber Guyger would still be free and probably still be cops. If it weren’t for MeToo, Harvey Weinstein would be free and Jeff Epstein’s 13 months would’ve been the end of the matter. The Epstein files would still be safely hidden away, even the redacted ones we’ve seen. I’d bet on it. And it’s not like MeToo went away without Epstein’s heavy finger on the scale…

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ArtemisA Artemis

                              Occupy Wall Street didn't fail. BLM didn't fail. Me Too didn't fail.

                              We need to rethink how change happens. Movements that bring us into alignment & helps us question & challenge oppression will not themselves topple the structures they critique. But they can help prepare us. They can shift the cultural landscape. They can do a lot of things.

                              Some people would really like us to think that all of that accomplishes nothing. Now how might they benefit from us believing that?

                              su_liamS This user is from outside of this forum
                              su_liamS This user is from outside of this forum
                              su_liam
                              wrote last edited by
                              #28

                              @artemis I agree with what you’re saying. I’d also add that OWS, Me Too and BLM only “failed” in much the same way that Cuba, Venezuela and Allende’s Chile “failed.” There was a concerted attempt by powerful and morally-untethered people to murder them with more or less success.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • MarianneN Marianne shared this topic
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups