i haven't seen anyone else posting about this but uh.
-
i haven't seen anyone else posting about this but uh. so windscribe claims that their servers were seized without a warrant. I'm not dutch but i find this a bit fishy. can anyone provide conext on this lol? (preferably someone who is dutch and works in a DC or DC-adjacent)
-
i haven't seen anyone else posting about this but uh. so windscribe claims that their servers were seized without a warrant. I'm not dutch but i find this a bit fishy. can anyone provide conext on this lol? (preferably someone who is dutch and works in a DC or DC-adjacent)
The number of times the Windscribe account continues to say "don't worry it was stored in ram" "don't worry we won't use these servers when they're returned" feels like marketing. Idr where, but there was a thread skeptical of this because a warrantless seizure doesn't exactly fit into a potential criminal prosecution
-
The number of times the Windscribe account continues to say "don't worry it was stored in ram" "don't worry we won't use these servers when they're returned" feels like marketing. Idr where, but there was a thread skeptical of this because a warrantless seizure doesn't exactly fit into a potential criminal prosecution
literally seems like nobody worth listening to is reporting this "story". lol i search and i find results from pcmag and techradar. that's about it. citing the windscribe twitter account. 10/10
-
The number of times the Windscribe account continues to say "don't worry it was stored in ram" "don't worry we won't use these servers when they're returned" feels like marketing. Idr where, but there was a thread skeptical of this because a warrantless seizure doesn't exactly fit into a potential criminal prosecution
@puppygirlhornypost2 honestly unsure, they should require a warrant, perhaps they grabbed the wrong server or perhaps they ignored the police.
there's too little context, and the only context that is there is from a single source, to really make out what happened here honestly. maybe the intern ate the server idk
-
@puppygirlhornypost2 honestly unsure, they should require a warrant, perhaps they grabbed the wrong server or perhaps they ignored the police.
there's too little context, and the only context that is there is from a single source, to really make out what happened here honestly. maybe the intern ate the server idk
@anthropy@mastodon.derg.nz yeah that's what im thinking like. this feels fake af
-
R AodeRelay shared this topic
-
@anthropy@mastodon.derg.nz yeah that's what im thinking like. this feels fake af
@anthropy@mastodon.derg.nz compare this to like. when other companies have seizures and everyone reports on it.
-
literally seems like nobody worth listening to is reporting this "story". lol i search and i find results from pcmag and techradar. that's about it. citing the windscribe twitter account. 10/10
@puppygirlhornypost2 honestly i know nothing about this, but like, if it was in the US id believe it but,. the Netherlands???? im sure shits not perfect over there but, i just have a harder time believing that
- carrie -
@anthropy@mastodon.derg.nz compare this to like. when other companies have seizures and everyone reports on it.
@puppygirlhornypost2 I mean the police does grab servers more often here, and we have the but by my knowledge they require warrants- that said it does seem like the public prosecutor can give these really fast and for 'acute cybercrimes' it can bypass consent and what not.
it is important to note we have the uh WIV2023 and such which gives them a lot of privilege to just basically use zero days and wide taps to get data without any need for consent (dutch older example) https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet_op_de_inlichtingen-_en_veiligheidsdiensten_2017
