@gnulinux Ich bin ganz klar auf der Seite der Document Foundation.

@ricardo Yes, that's the general idea as I understand it. But "1.4 Extended", also as I understand it, includes things that are not in 1.4 and may or may not be in, but certainly likely won't be using the same schema, in a future 1.5.My ultimate goal is to use the current actual standard if at all possible; since that means that anything not covered by the current standard can't be represented, I want to know what, if anything, I'm actually doing in a document that's *not* thus representable.

@inverseatascii Glad to hear it! Support for files made in Apple's office apps is provided by this library, part of the Document Liberation Project: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/DLP/Libraries/libetonyek – Maybe you can share your experiences on the mailing list for it: https://www.documentliberation.org/contact/

@bluelupo @padeluun Leider ist das eben nicht übergreifend verpflichtend, weil der Dtld.-Stack selbst nicht verpflichtend ist.Das selbe gilt für die nationalen Architekturleitlinien (https://nationale-it-architekturrichtlinie.gov.de/)Gute Ansätze!Aber ohne harte Pflicht leider ein Papiertiger.

@harzretro klingt fast als wären #impressjs und Ähnlichkeiten Textdateien außer nde Ansätze bei so einem Umfang fast einfacher zu bearbeiten?

@libreoffice As a local Linux User Group @pnlug we are very honored and happy to actively collaborate in the event!

@jerrej Oh, LibreOffice shouldn't look like that at all! You are missing a vital desktop integration package for your distro. Search for "libreoffice-gtk" or similar in your package manager...