"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?" That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein Twitter, formally known as XXX
-
@Tooden that doesn't cover materials produced fearing or depicting those acts, which is why the term CSAM exists (I didn't make it up)
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein
The government's position is that while they abhor prostitution the brothel has the best piano. -
@andrewstroehlein Twitter, formally known as XXX
@andrewstroehlein *formerly, my brain is cooked right meow
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein
Jornalists insist in being there, too. This is mundo boggling. -
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.Dit zelfde geldt uiteraard ook voor de Nederlandse regering en vele anderen.
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein Yes but can we stop calling it that
-
@andrewstroehlein Why is *anyone* using a site that exploits women and children, contains child abuse, and is owned by a ketamine addicted nazi?
@pa27 @andrewstroehlein Are we talking about X, Facebook, or one of those things Trump and his loser brigade tried to launch?
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein The thing is, those journalists are themself posting there. -
@pa27 @andrewstroehlein Are we talking about X, Facebook, or one of those things Trump and his loser brigade tried to launch?
@jhooper @andrewstroehlein THe OP I think referred to X, which even the FT referred to yesterday as "X, the deepfake porn site formerly known as Twitter".
However it also beats me why anyone uses any of the Zuckerberg services, Facepalm, Insta, Whatsapp. Meta promote child abuse and misogyny as well as scams. Whatsapp becoming a de facto thing really annoys me...And as for Trumpistan social... is anyone but the orange demented twat and his robots on it? /rant mode off...
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.Which site? Got more info on this?
More and more we can't believe a word about anything since pizza gate, which smells like Minnesota daycare bullshit.
-
Which site? Got more info on this?
More and more we can't believe a word about anything since pizza gate, which smells like Minnesota daycare bullshit.
Never mind, got my answer:
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein Nope. "Why is any government on ANY private site?" is the question.
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.Leavitt: "What are children, really? What is consent, but some woke nonsense. Every one knows girls belong to their fathers, until he sells them to the highest bidder. That's what my Daddy, who art in Heaven, did with me, and I turned out fine!"
/s
-
@andrewstroehlein *child sexual abuse material (CSAM)
Sex requires consent
Children cannot consent
Sexual imagery featuring any child is abuse material, not porn. There is no 'child porn'.I think this is important because phrases like this, and 'sex trafficking' or 'sex pest' minimise the crime (rape and other abuses) and obscure perpetrators. We can and should hold media and commentators to account.
@noodlemaz @andrewstroehlein To me "child porn" sounds worse than a four letter acronym like "CSAM" and four full words is too long.
-
@Tooden well, per legal definitions, not all sexual abuse is rape. So I'm not sure how helpful it is to bundle various things under that term that has (relatively) clear and important applicability already. Hope that makes sense. I don't want to go looking up various things about it right now, but.
When the 'sex trafficking' discussions are going on, I do tend to bring up rape - because there is no 'sex' with trafficked people, since consent requires no threat or coersion or force. And trafficked people face all or most of those.
