"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?" That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.
-
Which site? Got more info on this?
More and more we can't believe a word about anything since pizza gate, which smells like Minnesota daycare bullshit.
Never mind, got my answer:
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.@andrewstroehlein Nope. "Why is any government on ANY private site?" is the question.
-
"Why is the government posting on a deepfake child porn site?"
That's the question to ask them, journalist friends.Leavitt: "What are children, really? What is consent, but some woke nonsense. Every one knows girls belong to their fathers, until he sells them to the highest bidder. That's what my Daddy, who art in Heaven, did with me, and I turned out fine!"
/s
-
@andrewstroehlein *child sexual abuse material (CSAM)
Sex requires consent
Children cannot consent
Sexual imagery featuring any child is abuse material, not porn. There is no 'child porn'.I think this is important because phrases like this, and 'sex trafficking' or 'sex pest' minimise the crime (rape and other abuses) and obscure perpetrators. We can and should hold media and commentators to account.
@noodlemaz @andrewstroehlein To me "child porn" sounds worse than a four letter acronym like "CSAM" and four full words is too long.
-
@Tooden well, per legal definitions, not all sexual abuse is rape. So I'm not sure how helpful it is to bundle various things under that term that has (relatively) clear and important applicability already. Hope that makes sense. I don't want to go looking up various things about it right now, but.
When the 'sex trafficking' discussions are going on, I do tend to bring up rape - because there is no 'sex' with trafficked people, since consent requires no threat or coersion or force. And trafficked people face all or most of those.
