Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Armin was once one of the most prolific programmers in Python.

Armin was once one of the most prolific programmers in Python.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
66 Posts 45 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Dan SugalskiW Dan Sugalski

    @cwebber What's telling, I think, is that all these people go on about how much they're doing and how great AI is to help them build more *but there's no actual demonstrable stuff being done.* I mean, if AI was some kind of Nx multiplier you'd think we'd be getting N times more actual functionality out of software but mostly it seems like the N multiplier only applies to blog posts about how AI multiplies their programming.

    Woke Leftist TrashA This user is from outside of this forum
    Woke Leftist TrashA This user is from outside of this forum
    Woke Leftist Trash
    wrote last edited by
    #61

    @wordshaper @cwebber every line of code is a liability. it's funny that suddenly "lines of code generated" is a metric and they're all smiling, proud.

    meanwhile... some AWS agent decided to rewrite half the code base on its own and deploy it to production which took down some important AWS services.

    we'll just keep generating more, faster. tech debt creation at scale.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Chris BurgessX Chris Burgess

      @cwebber identity, community, established relationships, safety of a known space?

      (I don't know this individual, answering in the general sense)

      Chris BurgessX This user is from outside of this forum
      Chris BurgessX This user is from outside of this forum
      Chris Burgess
      wrote last edited by
      #62

      @cwebber on reflection, "I am no longer a part of community X" is probably a big step for hearts to take, even when original criteria for membership are no longer met

      Even when humans stray FAR from a community, I think they can identify/feel it quite differently! ("I'm the only remaining true member of community X")

      Yes X is a wryly amusing placeholder to me rn lol

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Dan SugalskiW Dan Sugalski

        @cwebber What's telling, I think, is that all these people go on about how much they're doing and how great AI is to help them build more *but there's no actual demonstrable stuff being done.* I mean, if AI was some kind of Nx multiplier you'd think we'd be getting N times more actual functionality out of software but mostly it seems like the N multiplier only applies to blog posts about how AI multiplies their programming.

        Messieur PhoqueG This user is from outside of this forum
        Messieur PhoqueG This user is from outside of this forum
        Messieur Phoque
        wrote last edited by
        #63

        @wordshaper @cwebber I don't think you appreciate just how many man years go into writing production level code. My productivity has tripled but if takes weeks to get a prototype in front of 100k+ users. Is not like we're going to release clawd and watch the world burn

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Christine Lemmer-WebberC Christine Lemmer-Webber

          Armin was once one of the most prolific programmers in Python. Says he never writes code anymore. Seeing more and more people like him write stuff like this on what are supposedly computer programming forums. https://lobste.rs/s/qmjejh/ai_is_slowly_munching_away_my_passion#c_jcgdju

          Notably, once a person crosses this threshold, I see them still hang out on programming forums, but they never talk about any of the puzzles of programming anymore. Only about running agents. Which feels strange and sad. Why hang out on the forums at all then?

          alysA This user is from outside of this forum
          alysA This user is from outside of this forum
          alys
          wrote last edited by
          #64

          @cwebber yeah, even without my and many others’ objections to LLMs, it’s depressing to read about someone essentially giving up a skill.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Martijn FaassenF Martijn Faassen

            @futurebird

            @cwebber

            Very nice! I have watched experienced devs have to work at this too. They often lean towards overcomplicating things because they want to avoid hardcoding the patterns. But this then leads to a nice little discussion.

            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
            myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
            myrmepropagandist
            wrote last edited by
            #65

            @faassen @cwebber

            This is a funny question because it's kind of got a few built in traps. And then you are writing some function to determine if a number is "one less than a group symbol" and your code looks like a pile of ASCII.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • JWcph, Radicalized By DecencyJ JWcph, Radicalized By Decency

              @cwebber Also, don't use it for "summarize" because it literally can't do that.

              https://ea.rna.nl/2024/05/27/when-chatgpt-summarises-it-actually-does-nothing-of-the-kind/

              Rainer Agentic Quantum RehakR This user is from outside of this forum
              Rainer Agentic Quantum RehakR This user is from outside of this forum
              Rainer Agentic Quantum Rehak
              wrote last edited by
              #66

              @jwcph @cwebber Also see “ChatGPT trust is risky, as a recent study by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) shows. The association of 68 public broadcasters from 56 countries systematically tested the reliability of the most popular AI systems. The alarming result: ChatGPT, Gemini, and other chatbots invent up to 40 percent of their answers and present them as facts.”

              EBU – European Broadcasting Union (2025) News Integrity in AI Assistants. An international PSM study, https://www.ebu.ch/Report/MIS-BBC/NI_AI_2025.pdf

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups