"photographed in the late 1800s": normal.
-
"photographed in the late 1800s": normal. it happens.
"photographed in the Qing Dynasty": what. that can't be right.
(the Qing dynasty began in the 1600s and ended not long after photography became a globally accessible medium)
-
"photographed in the late 1800s": normal. it happens.
"photographed in the Qing Dynasty": what. that can't be right.
(the Qing dynasty began in the 1600s and ended not long after photography became a globally accessible medium)
@0xabad1dea Attempt at a brief historical analysis: the Quinq dynasty ended at the beginning of the 19th century with the revolution.
Photography was already present in the 18th century.
Abraham Lincoln had already been photographed and, as is well known, was shot in 1865.
I think it was possible to take a photo in China at the end of the 18th century. -
@0xabad1dea Attempt at a brief historical analysis: the Quinq dynasty ended at the beginning of the 19th century with the revolution.
Photography was already present in the 18th century.
Abraham Lincoln had already been photographed and, as is well known, was shot in 1865.
I think it was possible to take a photo in China at the end of the 18th century.@pemar thank you for repeating my post back to me except worse because you mixed up 18th and 19th centuries
-
"photographed in the late 1800s": normal. it happens.
"photographed in the Qing Dynasty": what. that can't be right.
(the Qing dynasty began in the 1600s and ended not long after photography became a globally accessible medium)
@0xabad1dea I can take photos of dinosaurs, hanging around in their habitat. I mean, of birds.
-
R ActivityRelay shared this topic
