Sometimes I get a really good quote in.
-
Sometimes I get a really good quote in.
“Pointing out that AI is prone to giving ICE bad information is missing the entire point of ICE,” EFF’s Eva Galperin told Rolling Stone. “They don’t care if the information they have is good.”
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-commentary/ice-ai-mistakes-1235507183/
-
Sometimes I get a really good quote in.
“Pointing out that AI is prone to giving ICE bad information is missing the entire point of ICE,” EFF’s Eva Galperin told Rolling Stone. “They don’t care if the information they have is good.”
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-commentary/ice-ai-mistakes-1235507183/
AI as a pretext for doing fascism is basically seems to be most of the point of AI
-
AI as a pretext for doing fascism is basically seems to be most of the point of AI
@simonzerafa @evacide
As long as the software tells them they can deport a brown or black person, it's "working" -
Sometimes I get a really good quote in.
“Pointing out that AI is prone to giving ICE bad information is missing the entire point of ICE,” EFF’s Eva Galperin told Rolling Stone. “They don’t care if the information they have is good.”
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-commentary/ice-ai-mistakes-1235507183/
@evacide a point I was hoping to see in this article is that randomness—maybe slightly skewed towards a target—is an effective instrument of terror. It's not just that they don't care and are happy to invent pretexts after the fact, but systems like what they are building, which may result in targeting anyone, serve their purpose *better* than accurate systems that don't make mistakes.
-
@simonzerafa @evacide
As long as the software tells them they can deport a brown or black person, it's "working" -
R ActivityRelay shared this topic
