Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. History Memes
  3. Ah, the good ol' days!

Ah, the good ol' days!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved History Memes
historymememedicineslaverysexism
1 Cross-posts 20 Posts 13 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • PugJesusP PugJesus
    This post did not contain any content.
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    spacehooks@reddthat.com
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    This mene made me go an read article on the history of women's restrooms 🤣

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N NoneOfUrBusiness

      Only nobility and rich commoners really had to think about fighting wars; most medieval people would just be tending to their lands.

      PugJesusP This user is from outside of this forum
      PugJesusP This user is from outside of this forum
      PugJesus
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      I mean, it depends on where your standard for 'rich' is. As late as the 12th century AD in England, all freemen were required to have a basic standard of equipment in case they were called upon by the king for military service. That's apart from any demands laid on them by their immediate overlord.

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • PugJesusP PugJesus
        This post did not contain any content.
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        turtlesareneat
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        I just asked to be born 10 years earlier so I could enjoy the 80s. Got my own coke spoon and everything.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • PugJesusP PugJesus
          This post did not contain any content.
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          Andy Weir has a question he likes to ask people: "you have to go back in time with no recourse to return, and you must do so in multiples of 100 years. Which year do you choose?"

          He then goes on to note that people usually pick the closest date, and draws from that that we are progressing and getting better as time goes by.

          I would pick a time before the advent of agriculture and animal husbandry. 15000 years ago, just to be on the safe side. Most infections haven't crossed over from other animals. A diverse diet. Sure, I'd have to find and befriend a nomadic group, and escape predators. But I'd rather take my chances there than in any other "civilized" period of history.

          Another option is, if I can pick the place, I'd go to one of several points in the western shore of the Americas that were not inhabited by cannibals in 1426, try and befriend as many locals and convince them to KOS any European. Which has the added bonus of creating a time paradox.

          C PugJesusP 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • PugJesusP PugJesus
            This post did not contain any content.
            orca@orcas.enjoying.yachtsO This user is from outside of this forum
            orca@orcas.enjoying.yachtsO This user is from outside of this forum
            orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            I’d like to skip to the part where we guillotine all of the fascists, racists, and corrupt politicians.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • PugJesusP PugJesus

              I mean, it depends on where your standard for 'rich' is. As late as the 12th century AD in England, all freemen were required to have a basic standard of equipment in case they were called upon by the king for military service. That's apart from any demands laid on them by their immediate overlord.

              N This user is from outside of this forum
              N This user is from outside of this forum
              NoneOfUrBusiness
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              Sure, but those requirements didn't translate to actual military service for the vast majority of people. In the first place Medieval economies couldn't (or wouldn't, depending on how you look at it) fund the large-scale armies that would make conscription desirable; it made a lot more sense for elites to recruit pseudo-mercenaries (or just outright mercenaries) and reward them for loyal service. There are plenty of exceptions, but historically military service has been something you do because you're rewarded for it, not because scary men with swords will kill you if you don't.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A acockworkorange@mander.xyz

                Andy Weir has a question he likes to ask people: "you have to go back in time with no recourse to return, and you must do so in multiples of 100 years. Which year do you choose?"

                He then goes on to note that people usually pick the closest date, and draws from that that we are progressing and getting better as time goes by.

                I would pick a time before the advent of agriculture and animal husbandry. 15000 years ago, just to be on the safe side. Most infections haven't crossed over from other animals. A diverse diet. Sure, I'd have to find and befriend a nomadic group, and escape predators. But I'd rather take my chances there than in any other "civilized" period of history.

                Another option is, if I can pick the place, I'd go to one of several points in the western shore of the Americas that were not inhabited by cannibals in 1426, try and befriend as many locals and convince them to KOS any European. Which has the added bonus of creating a time paradox.

                C This user is from outside of this forum
                C This user is from outside of this forum
                CentipedeFarrier
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                Hopefully your minor infections are too foreign to them and don't simply wipe them off the earth. And hopefully the food available doesn’t completely fuck up your modern digestion.

                But I’m with you on going back really far. Before property ownership. Before human-caused climate change started (which was well before industrialization, due to cook/heat fires).

                Downside: dogs and cats not domesticated yet. Probably no/limited pack animals either. If you don't find the locals relatable or existing, you’re in for a rough time. Also most/all food hadn't been selectively bred yet, and was nothing like what we are used to today, was all small, hard, seedy, not very sweet. Most foods we eat are also non-native, and were brought back from global exploration, so that varied diet you are anticipating might be largely salted or smoked meat, instead. Certainly the case if you go somewhere with seasons. I have a rough idea of what can be foraged around me, but most of it is modern cultivars. The wild ones are kinda meh, tbh, you have to get really creative to use them.

                But a major upside is even if you are the dumbest person alive today, you've got a LOT of knowledge to offer such primitive societies.

                A 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A acockworkorange@mander.xyz

                  Andy Weir has a question he likes to ask people: "you have to go back in time with no recourse to return, and you must do so in multiples of 100 years. Which year do you choose?"

                  He then goes on to note that people usually pick the closest date, and draws from that that we are progressing and getting better as time goes by.

                  I would pick a time before the advent of agriculture and animal husbandry. 15000 years ago, just to be on the safe side. Most infections haven't crossed over from other animals. A diverse diet. Sure, I'd have to find and befriend a nomadic group, and escape predators. But I'd rather take my chances there than in any other "civilized" period of history.

                  Another option is, if I can pick the place, I'd go to one of several points in the western shore of the Americas that were not inhabited by cannibals in 1426, try and befriend as many locals and convince them to KOS any European. Which has the added bonus of creating a time paradox.

                  PugJesusP This user is from outside of this forum
                  PugJesusP This user is from outside of this forum
                  PugJesus
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  I'VE TRAINED FOR THIS DAY

                  SEND ME BACK TO THE 6th CENTURY BCE

                  I'M READY TO REINVENT CIVILIZATION

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • PugJesusP This user is from outside of this forum
                    PugJesusP This user is from outside of this forum
                    PugJesus
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    But military service was widespread as an obligation, and armies were not always small. The small size of most medieval armies has more to do with logistics concerns and speed of mustering from distant fiefs more than a general lack of use of the poor. During The Anarchy in England, clashes of tens-of-thousands of troops occurred, despite England only having a population of ~1 million to begin with. Not only that, but garrison forces were still needed in wartime, a common obligation of serjeanty and wardstaff in feudal contracts. Recruitment of mercenaries became more common as the medieval period wore on, but mercenaries aren't always available - and the earlier in the medieval period, the more sparse mercenaries are. Not to mention the trouble of seeking them out to begin with; not always a good choice when forces are needed quickly.

                    Being rewarded for service and being obligated aren't mutually exclusive. And you don't have to be threatened with death for it to be obligatory - fines were the usual punishment for evading service in most medieval polities.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C CentipedeFarrier

                      Hopefully your minor infections are too foreign to them and don't simply wipe them off the earth. And hopefully the food available doesn’t completely fuck up your modern digestion.

                      But I’m with you on going back really far. Before property ownership. Before human-caused climate change started (which was well before industrialization, due to cook/heat fires).

                      Downside: dogs and cats not domesticated yet. Probably no/limited pack animals either. If you don't find the locals relatable or existing, you’re in for a rough time. Also most/all food hadn't been selectively bred yet, and was nothing like what we are used to today, was all small, hard, seedy, not very sweet. Most foods we eat are also non-native, and were brought back from global exploration, so that varied diet you are anticipating might be largely salted or smoked meat, instead. Certainly the case if you go somewhere with seasons. I have a rough idea of what can be foraged around me, but most of it is modern cultivars. The wild ones are kinda meh, tbh, you have to get really creative to use them.

                      But a major upside is even if you are the dumbest person alive today, you've got a LOT of knowledge to offer such primitive societies.

                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                      acockworkorange@mander.xyz
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      There's a lot of strong evidence that agriculture reduced variety in human diet considerably. But you're right that the variety we have nowadays is hard to beat (though scurvy is making a comeback).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups