Good history reminder.
-
Good history reminder. For.. no reason at all, eh.
---
In the 1930s, British leaders pursued appeasement because they wanted to avoid a second world war.
"Today, appeasement is usually regarded as a failure"
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/neville-chamberlain
-
Good history reminder. For.. no reason at all, eh.
---
In the 1930s, British leaders pursued appeasement because they wanted to avoid a second world war.
"Today, appeasement is usually regarded as a failure"
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/neville-chamberlain
If we stay silent about Venezuela, and now about Greenland... Who will stay silent when it's our turn?
-
If we stay silent about Venezuela, and now about Greenland... Who will stay silent when it's our turn?
@stephanie Something tells me Danielle Smith would open the front door for them.
-
If we stay silent about Venezuela, and now about Greenland... Who will stay silent when it's our turn?
@stephanie Wise words!
-
R AodeRelay shared this topic
-
If we stay silent about Venezuela, and now about Greenland... Who will stay silent when it's our turn?
@stephanie Thank you!
-
@stephanie Something tells me Danielle Smith would open the front door for them.
@irfan @stephanie Just speculating, but I think the US would not run with the Venezuelan leadership decapitation approach with Canada.
They'd likely do something closer to what Russian did in Ukraine, annexing just the bits they want (Alberta), while citing broad regional support for the action (Smith).
-
@irfan @stephanie Just speculating, but I think the US would not run with the Venezuelan leadership decapitation approach with Canada.
They'd likely do something closer to what Russian did in Ukraine, annexing just the bits they want (Alberta), while citing broad regional support for the action (Smith).
-
@stephanie @irfan In my head there'd be military. Oh my yes, all over Alberta. But it would be painted as liberation. Again, just speculation on my part.
