Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Finally got around to reading this one and, it's not great.

Finally got around to reading this one and, it's not great.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
4 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)E This user is from outside of this forum
    Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)E This user is from outside of this forum
    Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Finally got around to reading this one and, it's not great. Mostly it's frustrating to see how the muddled logic and motivated reasoning of Yoshua Bengio & co make it hard for journalists to get and convey a clear understanding.

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/science-fiction-artificial-intelligence-robots

    Short đź§µ>>

    Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)E 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)E Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)

      Finally got around to reading this one and, it's not great. Mostly it's frustrating to see how the muddled logic and motivated reasoning of Yoshua Bengio & co make it hard for journalists to get and convey a clear understanding.

      https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/science-fiction-artificial-intelligence-robots

      Short đź§µ>>

      Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)E This user is from outside of this forum
      Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)E This user is from outside of this forum
      Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Bengio is quoted like this as a refutation of this quote from me:

      Algorithms “combust[ing] into consciousnesses” and deciding to kill us all “is not the problem I’m worried about”

      See if you can spot the logical leap in his argument

      >>

      Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)E mkjM 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      0
      • Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)E Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)

        Bengio is quoted like this as a refutation of this quote from me:

        Algorithms “combust[ing] into consciousnesses” and deciding to kill us all “is not the problem I’m worried about”

        See if you can spot the logical leap in his argument

        >>

        Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)E This user is from outside of this forum
        Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)E This user is from outside of this forum
        Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        This seems to be a pretty typical move from the "AI Safety" crowd when folks point out that they are living in a fantasy world, enjoying imagining themselves as savoirs of humanity, etc. They briefly pretend to be concerned about harms that are somewhat less speculative,

        >>

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • MarianneN Marianne shared this topic
        • Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)E Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)

          Bengio is quoted like this as a refutation of this quote from me:

          Algorithms “combust[ing] into consciousnesses” and deciding to kill us all “is not the problem I’m worried about”

          See if you can spot the logical leap in his argument

          >>

          mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
          mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
          mkj
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @emilymbender Not sure if that's what you have in mind but I have to say that that "in theory" is pulling an AWFUL lot of weight in that part you quoted!

          I found myself in a discussion at one point not all that long ago which basically degenerated into "but what if AI does <thing> on its own accord" and no amount of "what part of that this is software running on physical computers we're talking about" could pierce that veil.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • R AodeRelay shared this topic
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups