Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT.

UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
85 Posts 39 Posters 239 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

    @PeterSommerlad @cstross

    Well the "home lan" is effectively the "corporate use case" I described, just for advanced IT folk.. (I used to do the same).

    The geoblocking use case is "fair" in the sense that it "just works", but almost certainly contravenes the streaming service providers T&Cs. It does nothing for privacy, since you clearly log into these services.

    (Psst: I also use TOR to get around geoblocking.. not quite as convenient, but free)

    ZimmieB This user is from outside of this forum
    ZimmieB This user is from outside of this forum
    Zimmie
    wrote last edited by
    #81

    @oschonrock @PeterSommerlad @cstross This gets at a particularly dumb part of “banning VPNs”: the VPN is just the transport mechanism the proxy service uses.

    No, we’re not a VPN, we’re a SOCKS proxy.

    No, SOCKS is banned now, so we shut that down. We do offer a QUIC proxy, though.

    And so on.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • DanielD Daniel

      @jaawerth @cstross @Nicovel0 the amendment does not appear to define "virtual private network", so ... does it include TOR? SSH SOCKS proxy? L2TP? PPPoE?

      The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
      The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
      The Doctor
      wrote last edited by
      #82

      @dan @jaawerth @cstross @Nicovel0 It will include whatever they deem it does for whatever purpose they see fit. Even Citrix and VNC if they think they need to.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

        @oschonrock @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Labour has a nasty paternalist/nanny state tradition going back over a century. It's baked in at this point: Labour knows what's best for you, peasant. (So do the Tories, but they approach it differently.)

        Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦U This user is from outside of this forum
        Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦U This user is from outside of this forum
        Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦
        wrote last edited by
        #83

        @cstross @oschonrock @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Perhaps try putting a labour MP in charge of the labour party instead of a fucking tory.... It failed with Blair and it is failing with Starmer.

        Oliver SchönrockO 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦U Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦

          @cstross @oschonrock @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Perhaps try putting a labour MP in charge of the labour party instead of a fucking tory.... It failed with Blair and it is failing with Starmer.

          Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
          Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
          Oliver Schönrock
          wrote last edited by
          #84

          @Ulrich_the_elder @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad TBF... Blair was better..

          He communicated better. So he managed to achieve more things that a labour govt should..

          Notably in education for him..

          But yeah he fucked it up by being a religious nutcase going on crusades in the middle east...(Very Tory) Among other things

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

            RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

            UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

            *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

            The Oracle WokStationW This user is from outside of this forum
            The Oracle WokStationW This user is from outside of this forum
            The Oracle WokStation
            wrote last edited by
            #85

            @cstross like I said ages ago, licensing VPN users is the intent. You'll need a "good" reason to obtain one, otherwise your isp will block #vpn traffic.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Ryan WildW Ryan Wild shared this topic
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups