Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
ellyE

elly@donotsta.re

@elly@donotsta.re
About
Posts
4
Topics
1
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

View Original

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • It is a long-standing tradition for Microsoft to use a runtime copy of Windows as a part of Windows Setup.
    ellyE elly
    @domi @speaktrap @nina_kali_nina I wonder what we could cram into modern SPI chips (32MB, but memory-mapped to 16MB).
    You could cram IFD (4K), ME (5M), BIOS (CBFS - coreboot w/libgfxinit + SeaBIOS) (8M) into the upped 16M boundary, giving you 16MB of SPI space just for the floppy image.

    If we would hack CFBS to support splits, you could get up-to 22MB of space to play around with
    Uncategorized

  • @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @elly
    ellyE elly
    @GrapheneOS @domi But... I don't want to attack you (personally) or the project. I have no reason for it.

    I bought a Pixel 6 back in 2022 *specifically* because of your project, stopped using it not because of something *you* did, but because I simply don't want Google's Services Frameworks on my phone at all (hence why notifications and other features weren't working). It would be exactly the same on LineageOS or other AOSP builds, it's entirely Google's fault (and my stubbornness).
    Phone was also too bulky/heavy for me, it was genuinely hard to use because of my condition and caused wrist pain among other issues. If hardware you're working on would be much smaller/lighter, have a mSD and headphone jack then I would gladly buy it.

    Once again, I'm somewhat adjacent to pmOS community but I genuinely never seen anyone badmouthing the project. The only thing I keep hearing at various events (in different communities) is "stay away from GrapheneOS's toxic community" (disclaimer: never been to your chats, so I won't comment whether that's true or not).

    I genuinely think it's a "spiral of hatred" where X time ago someone messed up an interaction, things got sour, and over time it spiraled out of control. Then the whole Rossmann thing happened, you didn't know how to deal with it so you started being more and more defensive (especially after trauma you've experienced) and whenever people said anything remotely negative about the project, it felt like an attack to you.
    I hope you realize that the sentence you wrote:

    > Every time you make inaccurate claims about GrapheneOS, you get closer to us beginning a massive response including organizing our community against the project as has been done by the postmarketOS community towards GrapheneOS with endless attacks on our team.

    Perfectly describes what I just said. Someone threw a rock at us, we threw a rock back. Except that rock hit the wrong person, so now we have two people throwing rocks at us. Rinse and repeat, I hope you will see what I see.
    Uncategorized

  • @GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social @elly
    ellyE elly
    @domi @GrapheneOS *sigh* I have to agree. Best thing you can do in front of "bullies" is to ignore them. Same thing goes for dealing with abusers - "best revenge is a life well lived".

    I have first-hand experience with both. Therapy doesn't mean an insult, nobody (at least in this thread) wants to hurt you. It took me years to accept I needed help myself, so I *think* I know how you feel.
    From my perspective at least, you've showed up and replied to my comment feeling hurt by purely my own experience/opinion.

    Since @domi chose kindness, hear me out: You've clearly been hurt and never processed the trauma you've experienced. Because of that every single bit of criticism feels like an attack to you.
    You can't control how people feel, but you can influence the image they have of you (and right now, you're influencing it negatively).

    When all is said and done - sure, GrapheneOS is an Android distribution. However, it has a lot of genuinely cool features and good engineering put into it. Hell, I'm still interested in hardware you're working on!

    To put words where my mouth is - I also blew up on multiple occasions when project I was maintaining got overwhelming and people demanded more and more for free. This was especially challenging for me, because I sometimes still have issues dealing with my emotions or navigating social constructs (aka my neurodivergent ass wasn't trained for this), plus social anxiety (which did get a lot better thanks to events like FOSDEM or C3) and no self-confidence to speak of.
    Thankfully I had a good friend who (figuratively) slapped me and gave me an ultimatum: You either seek therapy, or our friendship is done. I chose the former (and while it's still not perfect, I'm working on it as mentioned previously).

    Seems like you could use such a friend yourself, I can only hope this random comment from a random nerd in Europe will encourage you to at least try therapy. There's no stigma or shame. Everybody deserves happiness, including you.
    Uncategorized

  • I really wish Phoronix would stop making articles about stuff they have no idea about Signed FSP introduced with PantherLake (announced 2 days ago) does indeed introduce a new component called "FSP-O" which moves reset vector to the FSP
    ellyE elly
    I really wish Phoronix would stop making articles about stuff they have no idea about

    Signed FSP introduced with PantherLake (announced 2 days ago) does indeed introduce a new component called "FSP-O" which moves reset vector to the FSP.

    It's controlled by the same mechanism as BootGuard - if PCH is fused with vendor's keys (EOM), then only FSP binaries signed with that key will be allowed to execute.

    This however doesn't change anything for API mode (like what coreboot is using), only dispatch (UDK, likely AMI/Insyde).

    I'm sure support for signing in API mode will eventually happen, but the point is that as long as PCH isn't fused with vendor's keys (or BootGuard is disabled), FSP signing can be skipped (and you can even build your own if you have appropriate NDAs in place to get sources).

    Then, they claim "ACPI support is also added to the FSP" which is just factually false.
    Intel simply bumped PPI (Platform Initialization Specification), which extends topology information with Module, Tile and Die:
    - https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/PI_Spec_1_7_A_final_May1.pdf (page 2-187)
    - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/MpService.h#L104-L132
    - https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/89462

    Like... come on, do some research beforehand.
    Uncategorized
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups