@astro_jcm sadly, it seems that the amount of false information in internet is underrated, and it started long before AI. Now it can be generated at even higher rates. Looks like we either have to stop trusting online (and offline?) information without multi-layrred checks or we will need to forget such thing as online privacy alltogether. Don't know what is worse. Maybe there is a third way but i don't see it.
minzastro@datasci.social
Posts
-
Part 2 of this weird saga. -
What's going on here?@IcooIey @mttaggart wild thing indeed. Gatekeeping is in fact not a bad thing at all, and it worked long before AI. Open source communities have their right to place guardrails and policies, and they are not obliged to accept any PR. If they say "place a comment every second line" you should comply. If they say "that is good entry level issue, don't fix it with automated tools" - don't fix it, and don't complain if you do and they reject you, AI or not.
-
I have been thinking for quite some time that we need a decentralized network for preserving public domain works.@juergen_hubert i fear that decentralisation might work poorly in this case - long term preservation of curated accessible data needs effort and money. You'll need to store each item on many nodes - and this will need some orchestration and management. And global search should be possible, which is an issue.
-
Apple made $117.8bn in total profit (not revenue, of course) over the past four quarters, which is an average of $323 million per day.@mattgemmell are the costs of the press release preparation included in this 1m?