@Steve if you care to share more i am very interested in what thoughts my post helped inspire

@Steve @astronema i am not really denying any of that though?

even in the context of its history (which to be honest i don't think is as clear cut as a word belonging exclusively to transmeds, but i get that its a complicated one), however, i do have a problem with the people who call me evil and disgusting for saying that the trans experience is not a homogeneous mass and that in this word, that means something specific, i recognize a way to describe my own experience.

@astronema and i think the immediate reaction to police the language of anyone using a word transmeds also use yet hold no exclusive ownership over is exactly what my original post was about

@astronema i think there is a significat difference in our experiences between someone who doesn't medically transition and me, neither more trans or real, but different. i think denying me access to language to talk about that serves patriarchy quite a lot, that is how i mean it idk what you read into my words but i did not say any truscum shit here?

@astronema i am those people u don't like, should i be unkind to myself?

@astronema only if you use that distinction to claim that people who don't medically transition are somehow not real trans people, otherwise its literally just a way to differentiate between two different situations, which isn't transmedicalism it is how language works

day 366 of #estrogenmaxxing

"identifying as transsexual means you are transmed" is the "identifying as bisexual means you are transphobic" of trans discourse