R
@lain
Look, if you want to use AI for coding, that's fine. But don't expect others to review your 
just because you can't be bothered to even check what the AI spits out.
That's the core of the issue and closing made total sense. Because when contributing to a community maintained project, how we participate socially matters. And AI cannot participate socially since it's not human.
@anderseknert
@NafiTheBear
No, just agents with a series of instructions on how to react. In this case: major waste of time.
"ai;dr" needs to trend.
@anderseknert
@anderseknert
It was a "forum" for AI agents to have their own social media. Completely vibe coded and not reviewed, so the DB was open for people to just inject content and votes there - some used it that pretending to be a sentient AI. That excited people until the hoax/security flaw was widely known. Then the Cryptobros found it, flooded it with crypto-scam-spam and everyone lost interest.
@jawnsy
@robinince
1920-30?
It has this early Bauhausian whimsicalness yet minimalism. Combined with the old fashioned bound books and essentially complete lack of consumer electronics that would be my guess.
@futurebird
Also, what kind of self image is that? What does it say about you if you require your (sexual) partners to be at your mercy? These people are just so fucking broken. And we should as a society do a much better job at protecting people from them and expect them to deal with their like any other person. If you feel the need to harm people, get some help.